Skip to main content
Log in

The use of impedance cardiography for optimizing the interventricular stimulation interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy—a comparison with left ventricular contractility

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess whether impedance cardiography (IC) can correctly identify the optimal interventricular (VV) pacing interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Twenty four patients received a biventricular pacemaker and underwent IC for cardiac output (CO) measurements to identify the optimal VV interval. Invasive measurements of left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax were used as a reference. During optimization the VV interval was changed with 20 ms steps from +80 (LV pre-excitation) to−80 ms (RV pre-excitation). The optimal VV interval was defined as the one that resulted in the highest LV dP/dtmax value and the highest CO obtained by IC, respectively. During simultaneous biventricular pacing both LV dP/dtmax and CO increased (mean 16.6% and 16.2%, respectively) as compared to baseline. Biventricular pacing with optimized VV intervals resulted in a further absolute increase of LV dP/dt max and CO (5.6% and 41.3%, respectively). The average decrease in LV dP/dtmax was 79.6 ± 51.6 mmHg/s when the optimal VV interval was programmed according to the IC measurements. Cross spectral analysis showed no correlation between the optimal VV intervals identified by the two methods (p > 0.05) and identical optimal VV intervals were identified in only six of the 24 patients. When broader VV time intervals were compared the correlation between the two methods was statistically significant (p = 0,0166). In conclusion, the use of IC for VV interval optimization is questionable since these optimized time intervals do not seem to correlate well with those obtained by measuring LV dP/dt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cazeau, S., Leclercq, C., Lavergne, T., Walker, S., Varma, C., Linde, C., et al. (2001). Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) Study investigators. Effects of multisite biventricular pacingin patients with heart failure and intraventricular contraction delay. The New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 873–880.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., Krueger, S., Kass, D. A., De Marco, T., et al. (2004). Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) investigators. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2140–2150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland, J. F. G., Daubert, J. C., Erdmann, E., Freemantle, N., Gras, D., Kappenberger, L., et al. (2005). Cardiac resynchronization study (CARE-HF) investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 1539–1549.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birnie, D. H., & Tang, A. S. (2006). The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 21, 20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sogaard, P., Egeblad, H., Pedersen, A. K., Kim, W. Y., Kristensen, B. O., Hansen, P. S., et al. (2002). Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation, 106, 2078–2084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perego, G. B., Chianca, R., Facchini, M., Frattola, A., Balla, E., Zucchi, S., et al. (2003). Simultaneous vs sequential biventricular pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy: an acute hemodynamic study. European Journal of Heart Failure, 5, 305–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Gelder, B. M., Bracke, F. A., Meijer, A., Lakerveld, L. J., & Pijls, N. H. (2004). Effect oh optimizing the VV interval on left ventricular contractility in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 93, 1500–1503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bax, J. J., Ansalone, G., Breithardt, O. A., Derumeaux, G., Leclercq, C., Scalij, M. J., et al. (2004). Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: ready for routine clinical use? A critical appraisal. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 44, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butter, C., Stellbrink, C., Belalcazar, A., Villalta, D., Schlegl, M., Sinha, A., et al. (2004). Cardiac reshynchronization therapy optimization by finger plethysmography. Heart Rhythm, 1, 568–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, M. U., Schnabel, A., Rauwolf, T., Schulze, M., & Strasser, R. H. (2005). Impedance cardiography as a non-invasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 13, 223–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinroth, K. M., Elster, M., Nuding, S., Schlegel, F., Christoph, A., Carter, J., et al. (2007). Impedance cardiography: a useful and reliable tool in optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices. Europace, 9, 744–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drazner, M. H., Thompson, B., Rosenberg, P. B., Kaiser, P. A., Boehrer, J. D., Baldwin, B. J., et al. (2002). Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 89, 993–995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Belardinelli, R., Ciampani, N., Costantini, C., Blandini, A., & Purcaro, A. (1996). Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 77, 1293–1301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Albert, N. M., Hail, M. D., Li, J., & Young, J. B. (2004). Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. American Journal of Critical Care, 13, 469–479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ovsyshcher, I., Zimlichman, R., Katz, A., Bondy, C., & Furman, S. (1993). Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 21, 761–767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kindermann, M., Frohlig, G., Doerr, T., & Schieffer, H. (1997). Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve doppler versus impedance cardiography. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 20, 2453–2462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Sciaraffia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sciaraffia, E., Malmborg, H., Lönnerholm, S. et al. The use of impedance cardiography for optimizing the interventricular stimulation interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy—a comparison with left ventricular contractility. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 25, 223–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9367-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-009-9367-x

Keywords

Navigation