References
Banks, E.C. 2003. Ernst Mach’s world elements: a study in natural philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Banks, E.C. 2014. The realistic empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell: neutral monism reconceived. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blackmore, J.T. 1972. Ernst Mach: his work, life and influence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
de Paz, M., A.A.P. Videira, and A. Balsas. 2018. Pierre Duhem and Ernst Mach: Science and Philosophy. Revista Portuguesa De Filosofia 74 (1): 13–246.
Herneck, F. 1959. Zu einem Brief Albert Einsteins an Ernst Mach. Physikalische Blätter 15: 563–564.
Hiebert, E. 1970. Mach’s Philosophical Use of the History of Science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5: 184–203.
Holton, G. 1992. Ernst Mach and the Fortunes of Positivism in America. Isis 83: 27–60.
Mach, E. 1872. Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit. Translated as History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. LaSalle: Open Court, 1911.
Stadler, F. 2019a. Ernst Mach: life, work, influence. Cham: Springer.
Stadler, F. 2019b. Ernst Mach: Zu Leben, Werk und Wirkung. Cham: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was done during my Alexander von Humboldt fellowship (AvH_1204458) at Ruhr- Universität Bochum
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Paz, M. John Preston (Ed.): Interpreting Mach. Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2021, 287 + xii pp., £75 (hardcover), ISBN: 9781108474016. J Gen Philos Sci 53, 231–234 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-022-09601-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-022-09601-w