Notes
J. Fraser characterizes these as “expectation values of products of field operators associated with well-separated space-time regions” (p. 286), cf. Ruetsche (p. 306).
References
Barrett, J., Cavalcanti, E. G., Lal, R., & Maroney, O. J. (2014). No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states. Physical Review Letters, 112(25), 250403.
Healey, R. (2017). Quantum states as objective informational bridges. Foundations of Physics, 47(2), 161–173.
Holland, P. (2005). Computing the wavefunction from trajectories: Particles and wave pictures in quantum mechanics and their relation. Annals of Physics, A, 461, 3659–3679.
Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012). On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics, 8(6), 475.
Stanford, K. P. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, P. (2019). Scientific realism made effective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 209–237.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glick, D. Steven French & Juha Saatsi (Eds.): Scientific Realism and the Quantum. Oxford University Press: Oxford 2020, 336 pp., £60.00 (hardback), ISBN: 9780198814979. J Gen Philos Sci 52, 177–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09536-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09536-0