Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 591–594 | Cite as

Expanding Views of Evolution and Causality

Workshop ‘Cause and Process in Evolution’, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (KLI), Vienna, May 11th–14th, 2017
  • Jan BaedkeEmail author

Ever since Darwin published his Origin of Species, evolutionary theory has been expanded step by step. The last fundamental theoretical expansion is known as the ‘Modern Evolutionary Synthesis’. It represents the fusion of Mendel’s theory of inheritance and population genetics in the early and mid-20th century. In the last 20 years, evolutionary theory is undergoing a new phase of expansion. It is driven by research results on the interplay between developmental and evolutionary processes in fields such as epigenetics, niche construction theory, and evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). Researchers in these fields emphasize that the dynamic regulatory processes during embryo- and morphogenesis as well as organisms’ environmental responsiveness and activity should be considered more seriously in evolutionary theory. This novel perspective is coined ‘Extended Evolutionary Synthesis’ (Laland et al. 2015).

Around ten years ago, in 2008, Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd Müller organized...


  1. Baedke, J. (forthcoming). Above the gene, beyond biology: Towards a philosophy of epigenetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brigandt, I. (2010). Beyond reduction and pluralism: Toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology. Erkenntnis, 73, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brigandt, I. (2015). Evolutionary developmental biology and the limits of philosophical accounts of mechanistic explanation. In P.-L. Braillard & C. Malaterre (Eds.), Explanation in biology (pp. 135–173). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calcott, B. (2009). Lineage explanations: Explaining how biological mechanisms change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grant, B. (2010). Should evolutionary theory evolve? The Scientist, 24, 24.Google Scholar
  7. Hallgrímsson, B., Jamniczky, H., Young, N., et al. (2012). The generation of variation and the developmental basis for evolutionary novelty. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 318B, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendrikse, J. L., Parsons, T. E., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2007). Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evolution & Development, 9, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2013). More on how and why: Cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology and Philosophy, 28, 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M., et al. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, core assumptions, and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Love, A. C. (2006). Evolutionary morphology and evo-devo: Hierarchy and novelty. Theory in Biosciences, 124, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mesoudi, A., Blanchet, S., Charmantier, A., et al. (2013). Is non-genetic inheritance just a proximate mechanism? A corroboration of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Biological Theory, 7, 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minelli, A., & Baedke, J. (2014). Model organisms in evo-devo: Promises and pitfalls of the comparative approach. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 36, 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Noble, D. (2012). A theory of biological relativity: No privileged level of causation. Interface Focus, 2, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pigliucci, M. (2010). Phenotypic plasticity. In M. Pigliucci & G. B. Müller (Eds.), Evolution: The extended synthesis (pp. 355–378). Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pigliucci, M. (2014). Between holism and reductionism: A philosophical primer on emergence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 112, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution: The extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, J. S. (2016). Homeostasis and the physiological dimension of niche construction theory in ecology and evolution. Evolutionary Ecology, 30, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy IRuhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations