Advertisement

Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 411–415 | Cite as

Dirk Koppelberg and Stefan Tolksdorf (eds): Erkenntnistheorie—Wie und wozu?

Mentis, Münster 2015, 498 pp, €39.80, ISBN: 978-3-89785-348-5
  • Insa Lawler
Book review
  • 595 Downloads

To what end should or do we pursue philosophy and how? Meta-philosophical questions along these lines have gained more and more interest recently. The collected volume “Erkenntnistheorie—Wie und wozu?” (Engl.: “Epistemology—How and to what end?”) aspires to raise and tackle issues addressing the meta-epistemological questions “How is epistemology practiced and to what end?” (9). Although this aim sounds like a descriptive meta-epistemological endeavor, it is not surprising that many authors rather argue for normative claims surrounding the questions “How and to what end should epistemology be pursued?”. This review provides an overview on the collected volume and offers a critical evaluation of its overall achievement.

The editors Dirk Koppelberg and Stefan Tolksdorf compiled 13 new articles in German and supplemented them by a translated article by Joshua Shephard and Michael Bishop as well as translations of three articles by John Greco, Duncan Pritchard, and Ernest Sosa,...

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this research by a scholarship from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and by the Volkswagen Foundation for the project “A study in explanatory power” is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Bovens, L., & Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brendel, E. (2013). Wissen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brogaard, B. (2009). What Mary did yesterday: Reflections on knowledge-wh. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(2), 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the state of nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, C. (Ed.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of philosophical methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Elgin, C. (2007). Understanding and the facts. Philosophical Studies, 132(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greco, J. (2014). Episteme: Knowledge and understanding. In K. Timpe & C. Boyd (Eds.), Virtues and their vices (pp. 287–302). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Grimm, S. (2006). Is understanding a species of knowledge? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(3), 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hills, A. (2015). Understanding why. Noûs, 49(2), 1–28.Google Scholar
  10. Huber, F., & Schmidt-Petri, C. (Eds.). (2009). Degrees of belief. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kelp, C. (2014). Knowledge, understanding and virtue. In A. Fairweather (Ed.), Virtue epistemology naturalized (pp. 347–360), Synthese Library 366. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Kvanvig, J. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsson, E. J. (2015). Gettier and the method of explication: A 60 year old solution to a 50 year old problem. Philosophical Studies, 172(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sliwa, P. (2015). Understanding and knowing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, cxv(Part 1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spohn, W. (2012). The laws of belief: Ranking theory and its philosophical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. The Journal of Philosophy, 98, 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieUniversität Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations