Abstract
Psychoanalysis, in Freud’s day and our own, has met with and continues to meet with staunch opposition from critics. The most ruinous criticism comes from philosophers, with a special interest in science, who claim psychoanalysis does not measure up to the above-board canons of acceptable scientific practices and, thus, is not scientific. It is common today to direct such criticisms to all metempirical forms of psychotherapy—i.e., psychotherapies that in no way concern themselves with grounding their claims with empirical research. The most common defense is to cold-shoulder the criticism and counter that psychoanalysis, whether or not Freud recognized it, is a hermeneutical, not an etiological, method of therapy. In that regard, its measure of success is not symptom-removal or redirection of drive-energy in socially condoned or acceptable ways, but broadened understanding through a commonly created myth, effected by therapist and patient, for the patient’s wellbeing. In this undertaking, I argue that the hermeneutical apologia of psychoanalysis is a dodge, not a defense—an impenetrable asylum in which therapists can find refuge by buffering themselves from the possibility of criticism of the scientificity of their discipline. Because hermeneuticism disavows the possibility of knowledge in any meaningful sense—and, with that, scientific knowledge gained through observation or experimentation—it levels the epistemological playing field. With knowledge impossible and science annulled, no “investigative” inquiry or discipline can claim a status superior to any other and, hence, psychotherapy is an investigative discipline as legitimate as any other. The literature on the hermeneutic defence of psychotherapy is vast—too vast for anything but a representative sample of it in this critique. I focus merely on some of the most recent literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bornstein, R. (2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(1), 3–20.
Bouchard, M.-A., & Guérette, L. (1991). Psychotherapy as a hermeneutical experience. Psychotherapy, 38(2), 385–394.
Chessick, R. (2003). Psychoanalytic peregrination V: The zollikon lectures. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 31(2), 343–348.
Christopher, J. C. (2001). Culture and psychotherapy: Toward a hermeneutic approach. Psychotherapy, 38(2), 115–128.
Cioffi, F. (1998). Freud and the question of pseudo-science (pp. 4–17). Chicago: Open Court.
Cushman, P. (1993). Psychotherapy as moral discourse. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 13(2), 103–113.
Fowler, S. M. (2004). The self-overcoming subject: Freud’s challenge to the Cartesian ontology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 35(1), 97–109.
Frank, J. D. (1987). Psychotherapy, rhetoric, and hermeneutics: Implications for practice and research. Psychotherapy, 24(3), 293–302.
Gavridis, M. (2004). Hermeneutics and psychotherapy: Issues and perspectives, in brief. Existential Analysis, 15(2), 393–411.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice. Boston: Beacon Press.
Holowchak, M. A. (2007). Critical reasoning and science: Looking at science with an investigative eye. Lanham, MD: University Press of American.
Holowchak, M. Andrew (2012). When Freud (Almost) met Chaplin: The Science behind Freud's “Especially Simple, Transparent Case”. Perspectives on Science, 20(1), 44–74.
Lang, H. (1995). Hermeneutics and psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 49(2), 215–224.
Leavy, S. A. (2010). What happened to psychoanalysis? American Imago, 67(1), 73–87.
Martin, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychotherapy as the interpretation of being: Hermeneutic perspectives on psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 1–16.
Mills, J. (2007). A response to Grünbaum’s refutation of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(3), 539–544.
Mitchell, S. (2000). A response to Silverman. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17(1), 153–159.
Nagel, E. (1971). Methodological issues in psychoanlytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy (pp. 38–56). New York: New York University Press.
Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Routledge.
Qureshi, A. (2005). Dialogical relationship and cultural imagination: A hermeneutic approach to intercultural psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 59(2), 119–135.
Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. (1999). Renewing psychology: Beyond scientism and constructionism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Hermeneutics and the human sciences (J. B. Thompson, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sass, L. A. (1988). Humanism, hermeneutics, and the concept of the human subject. In S. B. Messer, L. A. Sass, & R. L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpretive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy, and psychopathology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Scriven, M. (1971). The experimental investigation of psychoanalysis. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy (pp. 226–251). New York: New York University Press.
Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Strenger, C, (2006). Freud’s forgotten evolutionary project. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 420–429.
Summers, F. (2008). Theoretical insularity and the crisis of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(3), 413–424.
Wallerstein, R. S. (2006). The relevance of Freud’s psychoanalysis in the 21st century. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 302–326.
Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Conversations on Freud: Excert from 1932-3 lectures. In R. Wollheim & J. Hopkins (Eds.), Philosophical essays on Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woolfolk, R. L. (1998). The cure of souls: Science, values, and psychotherapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zeddies, T. (2002). More than just words: A hermeneutic view of language in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19(1), 3–23.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers of JGPS for helpful comments that improved this piece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holowchak, M.A. Psychotherapy as Science or Knack? A Critique of the Hermeneutic Defense. J Gen Philos Sci 45, 223–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9260-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-014-9260-x