Skip to main content
Log in

Simulationen in den Sozialwissenschaften

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Simulation in the Social Sciences. Computer simulation—hereafter just called ‘simulation’— more and more is getting an important tool in scientific research and development. Simulations provide powerful means for quite different scientific disciplines, for instance for cosmology as well as for economics, and it seems that they can help to extend the borderline of science. However, from a methodological point of view, besides their benefits one can identify several theoretical problems which can occur in the process of scientific research. Some of these problems shall be discussed and consequences of these problems for the use of simulations shall be outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R. (1997a) The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton/New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R. (1997b). ‘Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Sciences’. In: Conte R., Hegselmann R., Terna P.(eds.), Simulation Social Phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp. 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiru A.B., Sieger D.B. (1998) ‘Neural Network as a Simulation Metamodel in Economic Analysis of Risky Projects’. European Journal for Operations Research 105:130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzer W. (1997) Die Wissenschaft und ihre Methoden Grundsätze der Wissenschaftstheorie. Alber, Freiburg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berends P., Romme G. (1999) ‘Simulation as a Research Tool in Management Studies’. European Management Journal 17(6): 576–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossel, H.: 1994, Modellbildung und Simulation, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 2., veränderte Auflage.

  • Casti J.L. (1997) Would-be Worlds. How Simulation is Changing the Frontiers of Science. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R., Hegselmann R., Terna P. (1997). ‘Social Simulation – A New Disciplinary Synthesis’. In: Conte R., Hegselmann R., Terna P. (eds.), Simulation Social Phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman P.J. (1999). ‘Modelling Individual Behaviour and Group Performance in an Intelligent Agent-Based Simulation of the Tragedy of the Commons’. Journal of Environmental Management 56:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran J., Gilbert N. (1994). ‘Simulating Societies: An Introduction’. In: Gilbert N., Doran J. (eds.), Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran J., Palmer M., Gilbert N., Mellars P. (1994). ‘The EOS Project: Modeling Upper Palaeolithic Social Change’. In: Gilbert N., Doran J. (eds) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp 195–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Drogoul A., Ferber J. (1994). ‘Multi-agent Simulation as a Tool for Studying Emergent Processes in Societies’. In: Gilbert N., Doran J. (eds) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. und Möhring, M.: 1995, ‘Der Beitrag der sozialwissenschaftlichen Informatik zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Modellbildung und Simulation’, in M. Gsänger and J. Klawitter, Hrsg.: Modellbildung und Simulation in den So- zialwissenschaften, Röll Verlag, Dettelbach, pp. 39–60.

  • Epstein J., Axtell R. (1996), Growing Artificial Societies – Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press, Cambridge/MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich D., Goldberg A.: (2000). ‘A Methodological Framework for the Validation of Predictive Simulations’. European Journal of Operational Research 124:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N. (1996a). ‘Simulation as a Research Strategy’. In: Troitzsch K.G., et al., (eds) Social Science Microsimulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 448–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N. (1996b). ‘Holism, Individualism and Emergent Properties. An Approach from the Perspective of Simulation’. In: Hegselmann R., Mueller U., Troitzsch K.G. (eds) Modelling and Simulation on the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N. (1998). ‘Simulation: An Introduction to the Idea’. In: Ahrweiler P., Gilbert N. (eds) Computer Simulations in Science and Technology Studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N., Troitzsch K.G. (1999). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld, E. v.: 1995, ‘Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und des Begriffs der Objektivität’ in H. v. Foerster, et al. (Hrsg.) Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. Piper, München, 2. Auflage, pp. 9–40.

  • Glasersfeld, E. v.: 1997, Wege des Wissens. Konstruktivistische Erkundungen durch unser Denken, Carl Auer, Heidelberg, New York.

  • Hegselmann R. (1996a) ‘Understanding Social Dynamics: The Cellular Automata Approach’. In: Troitzsch K.G., et al., (eds) Social Science Microsimulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 282–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann R. (1996b). ‘Cellular Automata in the Social Sciences’. In: Hegselmann R., Mueller U., Troitzsch K.G.(eds) Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 209–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejl, P. M.: 1995, ‘Konstruktion der sozialen Konstruktion. Grundlinien einer konstruktivistischen Sozialtheorie’, in H. v. Foerster, et al. (Hrsg.) Einführung in den Konstruktivismus, Piper, München, 2. Auflage, pp. 109–146.

  • Hempel C.G. (1977). Aspekte wissenschaftlicher Erklärung. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Janich P. (1996). Konstruktivismus und Naturerkenntnis. Auf dem Weg zum Kulturalismus. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. (2003). ‘Models, Simulation, and “Computer Experiments”’. In: Radder H. (ed) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 198–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen J.P.C. (1995). ‘Verification and Validation of Simulation Models’. European Journal of Operational Research 82:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen J.P.C., Sargent R.G. (2000) ‘A Methodology for Fitting and Validating Metamodels in Simulation’. European Journal of Operational Research 120:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klüver J. (1998). ‘Modelling Science as an Adaptive and Self-Organising Social System: Concepts, Theories and Modelling Tools’. In: Ahrweiler P., Gilbert N. (eds) Computer Simulations in Science and Technology Studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J., Stoica, Chr. and Schmidt, J.: 2003, ‘Formal Models, Social Theory and Computer Simulations: Some Methodical Reflections’. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6 (2), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/8.html.

  • Krausz E. (2000) The Limits of Science. Peter Lang Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané B. (1996). ‘Dynamic Social Impact. Robust Predictions from Simple Theory’. In: Hegselmann R., Mueller U., Troitzsch K.G. (eds) Modelling and Simulation on the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 287–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M.H., Lacey N.J. (2003). ‘The Influence of Epistemology on the Design of Artificial Agents’. Minds and Machines 13: 367–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leplin J. (1997) A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S.: 1971, ‘Simulation und Theoriebildung’, in H. Albert, Hrsg.: Sozial-theorie und soziale Praxis, Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan, pp. 78–113.

  • Malsch, Th., Florian, M., Jonas, M., und Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: 1998, ‘Sozionik’, in: Th. Malsch, Hrsg.: Sozionik. Soziologische Ansichten über künstliche Sozialität, Edition Sigma, Berlin, pp. 9–24.

  • Manhart K. (1995) KI-Modelle in den Sozialwissenschaften. Oldenbourg, München, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marney, J. P. and Tarbert, H. F. E.: 2000, ‘Why do Simulation? Towards a Working Epistemology for Practitioners of the Dark Arts’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (4), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/3/4/4.html.

  • Martial, F. von: 1992, ‘Einführung in die Verteilte Künstliche Intelligenz’, KI 1, 6–11.

  • Meier R.C., Newell W.T., Pazer H.L. (1969) Simulation in Business and Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs/New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen St. (1994). ‘Simulating Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Societies’. In: Gilbert N., Doran J. (eds) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp 165–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller G. (1996). ‘Exploring and Testing Theories: On the Role of Parameter Optimization in Social Science Computer Simulation’. In: Troitzsch K.G. et al., (eds) Social Science Microsimulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 66–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak A., Latané B. (1994) ‘Simulating the Emergence of Social Order from Individual Behaviour’. In: Gilbert N. , Doran J. (eds) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp 63–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1989, Logik der Forschung, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 9. verbesserte Auflage.

  • Schlick M. (1932) ‘Positivismus und Realismus’. Erkenntnis 3 (33):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell R. (1990). ‘Computersimulationen und Theoriebildung’. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 1(42):109–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte, R.: 1999, ‘Basispositionen in der Wirtschaftsinformatik – ein gemäßigt- konstruktivistisches Programm’, in J. Becker, et al. (Hrsg.), Wirtschafts- informatik und Wissenschaftstheorie. Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven, Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 211–241.

  • Séror A.C. (1994). ‘Simulation of Complex Organizational Processes: A Review of Methods and Their Epistemological Foundations’. In: Gilbert N., Doran J. (eds) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. UCL Press, London, pp 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller W. (1969). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Band I: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber Ch.S., Timpone R.J. (1996). Computational Modeling. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol 113, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks London New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub J.F. (1996), ‘On Reality and Models’. In: Casti J.L., Karlquist A. (eds) Boundaries and Barriers. On the Limits to Scientific Knowledge. Addison-Wesley, Reading/MA, pp 238–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Troitzsch K.G. (1990). Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: 1988, Was können wir wissen? Band 1: Die Natur der Erkenntnis, Hirzel, Stuttgart, 2. durchgesehene Auflage.

  • Wendel, H. J.: 1998, ‘Das Abgrenzungsproblem’, in H. Keuth (Hrsg.), Karl Popper. Logik der Forschung, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 41–66.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, K. Simulationen in den Sozialwissenschaften. J Gen Philos Sci 38, 111–126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-006-9011-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-006-9011-8

Keywords

Navigation