Journal of Electronic Testing

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 437–445 | Cite as

A Wideband Digital-to-Frequency Converter with Built-In Mechanism for Self-Interference Mitigation

  • Imran Bashir
  • Robert B. Staszewski
  • Oren E. Eliezer
  • Poras T. Balsara
Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

A digital-to-frequency converter (DFC) assisted by a built-in-self-measurement mechanism is presented. It demonstrates the capability to overcome oscillator pulling that is caused by the high-speed digital frequency-tuning signal that is fed into the DFC’s digitally-controlled-oscillator (DCO), thereby allowing the DFC to accommodate high-rate modulating data. Thus, by placing replica images and quantization noise far away from the transmitted carrier, the presented DFC is suitable for wireless applications having the most demanding spectral mask requirements, without necessitating RF filtering in the transmitter’s signal path. The proposed solution, designed with minimum overhead, reduces the extent of injection pulling experienced by the digitally controlled oscillator (DCO) due to ΣΔ dithering applied to its capacitor bank by adjusting the phase between the aggressor and victim signals through a digitally controlled delay (DCD) line. The proposed calibration and compensation scheme for the DCD is autonomous and simple computationally. The proposed solution has been demonstrated in a transmitter of a commercial cellular CMOS system-on-chip (SoC).

Keywords

Digital-to-frequency converter (DFC) Digitally controlled oscillator (DCO) All-digital PLL (ADPLL) Digitally controlled delay (DCD) Time-to-digital converter (TDC) Multi-stage noise shaping ΣΔ (MASH) 

References

  1. 1.
    Akhtar S, et al. (2006) Quad band digitally controlled oscillator for WCDMA transmitter in 90nm CMOS. In: IEEE CICC, pp 129–132Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bashir I et al (2006) Tuning word retiming of a digitally-controlled oscillator using RF built-in self-test. In: Proceedings of IEEE Dallas Circuits and Systems Workshop, DallasGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boos Z, Menkhoff A, Kuttner F, Schimper M, Moreira J, Geltinger H, Gossmann T, Pfann P, Beliter Al, Bauernfeind T (2011) A fully digital multimmode polar transmitter employing 17b RF DAC in 3G mode. IEEE Solid-State Circ Conf:376–377Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eliezer O, Staszewski RB, Bashir I, Bhatara S, Balsara PT (2009) A phase domain approach for mitigation of Self-Interference in wireless transceivers. IEEE J Solid State Circ 44(5):1436–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eliezer O, Staszewski RB, Mehta J, Jabbar F, Bashir I (2010) Accurate Self-Characterization of mismatches in a capacitor array of a Digitally-Controlled oscillator. Proceedings 2010 IEEE Dallas Circuits and Systems Workshop (DCAS 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fanori L et al (2010) Capacitive degeneration in LC-tank oscillator for DCO fine-frequency tuning. IEEE JSSC 45(12):2737–2745Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goteti P, Devarayanadurg G, Soma M (1997) DFT for embedded charge-pump PLL systems incorporating IEEE 1149.1. In: Proceedings IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp 210–213Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hung C-M, Barton N, Staszewski RB, Lee M-C, Leipold D (2005) A first RF digitally-controlled oscillator for SAW-less TX in cellular systems. Proceedings of 2005 Symposium on VLSI Circuits:402–405Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim S, Soma M (2001) An all-digital built-in self-test for high-speed phase-locked loops. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II 48(2):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kodama K et al (2011) A high frequency resolution digitally controlled oscillator using single period switching scheme. In: IEEE ESSCIRC, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li CJ, Hsiao CH, Wang FK, Horng TS, Peng KC (2009) A rigorous analysis of local oscillator pulling in frequency and discrete-time domain. In: Proceedings IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits (RFIC) Symposium, vol 4. Session RTU1C, pp 409–412Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Razavi B (2004) A study of injection locking and pulling in oscillators. IEEE J Solid-State Circ 39(9):1415–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Staszewski RB (2006) All digital frequency synthesizer in deep submicron CMOS. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Staszewski RB (2011) State-of-the-art and future directions of high-performance all-digital frequency synthesis in nanometer CMOS. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 58(7):1497–1510MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staszewski RB, Bashir I, Eliezer O (2007) RF Built-in self-test of a wireless transmitter. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II 54(2):186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toner MF, Roberts GW (1995) On the practical implementation of mixed analogdigital BIST. In: Proceedings of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp 525–528Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng S, Luong HC (2012) A 4.1-to-6.5GHz transformer-coupled CMOS quadrature digitally-controlled oscillator with quantization noise suppression. In: IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhuang J-C, Waheed K, Staszewski RB (2010) A technique to reduce phase/frequency modulation bandwidth in a polar RF transmitter. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I 57(8):2196–2207MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imran Bashir
    • 1
  • Robert B. Staszewski
    • 2
  • Oren E. Eliezer
    • 1
  • Poras T. Balsara
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA
  2. 2.University College DublinBelfieldIreland

Personalised recommendations