Abstract
In India, social prejudices against women are culturally entrenched, and women carry an unfair and disproportionate burden of unpaid work, often reduced to “unproductive labor”. Nuclear families are rapidly replacing multigenerational families, which could have a significant impact on women’s mobility and capacity to strike a balance between work and family life.
This article explores the time use pattern of working-age women in unpaid domestic work in multigenerational and multi-compositional households, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of household responsibilities and the potential implications on gender equality. This study uses data from the Time Use Survey (2019) of India, conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) from January – December 2019. Our study considers working-age women between 15 and 64 years and the sample size is 174,621. A negative binomial regression approach is used to explain the effect of explanatory factors on women’s time spent on unpaid domestic work and its family dynamics. Our findings reveal a significant gender disparity in unpaid work persisting across the lifespan. Specifically, married women bear a disproportionate burden of unpaid work compared to their unmarried counterparts. Higher education reduces the time spent by a working-age woman on unpaid domestic work. We find that women exhibit the most paradoxical traits, and the complex Indian social stratification contributes to a huge disparity in unpaid domestic work, with upper-caste Hindu, Muslim, and Sikh women putting in the most hours.
The presence of school-age children increases the amount of time women spend on unpaid domestic work. Women living in a nuclear family, on average, have higher levels of unpaid work compared to women living in multigenerational households. Unpaid domestic work of women reduces in female predominant households while increases in male predominant households. While natal parents are more supportive than in-laws, the education of parents and in-laws has a significant impact on unpaid domestic work. Our study has policy implications and discusses the conflicts working-age women could encounter between family and economic work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data can be found at: https://mospi.gov.in/time-use-survey
References
ActionAid (2017). Invisible Work, Invisible Workers: The Sub-Economies of Unpaid Work and Paid Work. https://www.actionaidindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Invisible-Work-Invisible-Workers-correction_e-book.pdf.
Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799.
Agrawal, M. (2019). It is not your job - unpaid care work in India. https://www.oxfamindia.org/blog/unpaid-care-work-in-india.
Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2006). Measuring trends in leisure. In Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Proceedings. http://www.frbsf.org/economics/conferences/0603/mtl.pdf.
Ali, B., Dhillon, P., Muthusamy, S., & Mishra, U. S. (2023). Understanding Female Labour Force Participation and Domestic Work in India: The Role of Co-residence and Household Composition. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 8(2), 162–193.
Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228949.
Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives, the dynamics of Married Living. The Free Press.
Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5(3), 302–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463193005003003.
Caldwell, J. (1984). Causes of fertility decline in south India. Population Council.
Chopra, D., & Zambelli, E. (2017). No time to rest: Women’s lived experiences of balancing paid work and unpaid care work. Institute of Development Studies. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13574.
Coverman, S., & Sheley, J. F. (1986). Change in men’s housework and child-care time, 1965–1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(2), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.2307/352409.
Crompton, R. (2006). Employment and the family: The reconfiguration of work and family life in contemporary societies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488962.
Das, M. B. (2004). Muslim women’s low labour force participation in India: Some structural explanations. In Z. Hasan, & R. Menon (Eds.), A minority: Essays on muslim women in India (pp. 189–221). Oxford University Press.
Das, M. B. (2006). Do traditional axes of exclusion affect labor market outcomes in India? Available at SSRN 1919070. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/195941468034790110/pdf/369630sdp970web.pdf.
Das, M. S., Jain-Chandra, M. S., Kochhar, M. K., & Kumar, N. (2015). Women workers in India: why so few among so many? International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp1555.pdf.
Debnath, S. (2015). The impact of household structure on female autonomy in developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(5), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.983909.
Deshpande, A., & Kabeer, N. (2021). Norms that matter: Exploring the distribution of women’s work between income generation, expenditure-saving, and unpaid domestic responsibilities in India (No. 2021/130). WIDER Working Paper.
Dhanaraj, S., & Mahambare, V. (2019). Family structure, education and women’s employment in rural India. World Development, 115, 17–29.
Diggle, P. J., & Ribeiro, P. J. (2007). Geostatistical design. Model-based Geostatistics (pp. 199–212). Springer. Springer Series in Statisticshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48536-2_8.
Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold Bargaining and Resource Allocation in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkt001.
Eswaran, M., Ramaswami, B., & Wadhwa, W. (2013). Status, caste, and the time allocation of women in rural India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1086/668282.
Evans, J., Sahgal, N., Salazar, A. M., Starr, K. J., & Corichi, M. (2022). How indians view gender roles in families and society. Pew Research Center.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 866–884. https://doi.org/10.2307/353307.
Garcia, R., & Tomlinson, J. (2021). Rethinking the domestic division of labor: Exploring change and continuity in the context of redundancy. Sociology, 55(2), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520947311.
Gautham, L. (2022). It takes a village: Childcare and women’s Paid Employment in India. Population and Development Review, 48, 795–828.
Georgieva, K., Alonso, C., Dabla-Norris, E., & Kochhar, K. (2019). The economic cost of devaluing womens work. https://blogs.imf.org/2019/10/15/the-economic-cost-of-devaluing-womens-work/.
Ghosh, J. (2009). Informalization and women’s workforce participation. Razavi S (Ed.) The gendered impacts of liberalization: Towards embedded liberalism? (pp. 163–190). Routledge.
Greene, W. (2008). Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters, 99(3), 585–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.10.015.
Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, Home Production, and work-the theory of the allocation of Time Revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1099–1123. https://doi.org/10.1086/260629.
Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014). Regression models for count data based on the negative binomial (p) distribution. The Stata Journal, 14(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1401400203.
Hasnain, A., & Srivastava, A. (2018). Social norms, gender roles and Time Use: Multigenerational households in India. Bridgewater Review, 37(2), 10–14. https://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol37/iss2/5.
Hilbe, J. M. (2007). STATISTICA 7: An overview. The American Statistician, 61(1), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313007X172998.
Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973420.
Hilbe, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2007). 7 count response regression models. Handbook of Statistics, 27, 210–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(07)27007-5.
Himmelweit, S. (1995). The discovery of unpaid work: The social consequences of the expansion of work. Feminist Economics, 1(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/714042229.
Hirway, I. (2015). Unpaid work and the economy: Linkages and their implications. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 58(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-015-0010-3.
Jayaraman, R., & Khan, B. (2023). Does co-residence with parents-in-law reduce women’s employment in India? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4331137.
John, D. (1996). Women’s reports of men’s childcare participation: An examination of African-American and white families. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 5(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/106082659600500102.
Jung, A. K., & O’Brien, K. M. (2019). The profound influence of unpaid work on women’s lives: An overview and future directions. Journal of Career Development, 46(2), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317734648.
Kabeer, N. (2019). Women’s empowerment and the question of choice. Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 209–214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26760843.
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004.
Lyonette, C., & Crompton, R. (2015). Sharing the load? Partners’ relative earnings and the division of domestic labor. Work Employment and Society, 29(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014523661.
Marois, G., Zhelenkova, E., & Ali, B. (2022). Labour force projections in India until 2060 and implications for the demographic dividend. Social Indicators Research, 164(1), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02968-9.
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Binary data. In P. McCullagh (Ed.), Generalized linear models (2nd ed., pp. 98–148). Springer, US. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203753736-4.
Mehrotra, S., & Sinha, S. (2017). Explaining falling female employment during a high growth period. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(39), 54–62. https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/39/special-articles/explaining-falling-female-employment-during-high-growth-period.html.
Mincer, J., & National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. (1962). Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply. In,. (Ed.). Aspects of Labor Economics (pp. 63–105), Princeton University Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c0603/c0603.pdf.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (2019). Time Use Survey. National Statistical Office. Available at http://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Report_TUS_2019_0.pdf.
Mishra, N. K., & Tripathi, T. (2011). Conceptualising women’s Agency, autonomy and empowerment. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(11), 58–65. https://www.epw.in/journal/2011/11/special-articles/conceptualising-womens-agency-autonomy-and-empowerment.html.
Morgan, T., Williams, L. A., Trussardi, G., & Gott, M. (2016). Gender and family caregiving at the end-of-life in the context of old age: A systemic review. Palliative Medicine, 30, 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315625857.
Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2006). Traditional institutions meet the modern world: Caste, gender, and schooling choice in a globalizing economy. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1225–1252.
Narzary, P. K., & Ladusingh, L. (2019). Discovering the Saga of inter-caste marriage in India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619829896.
Nikore, M. (2022). Building India Economy on the Backs of Women Unpaid Work: A Gendered Analysis of Time-Use Data. https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ORF_OccasionalPaper_372_Time-Use-Gender_new.pdf.
NITI Aayog (2017). Towards building a more inclusive society. Three Year Action Agenda 2017–18 to 2019–20, Chap. 22.
Oakley, A. (1974). Woman’s work: The Housewife, Past and Present. Vintage Books.
Oxfam India (2020). On women’s backs: India inequality report 2020. New Delhi: Oxfam India. https://www.oxfamindia.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/Oxfam_Inequality%20Report%202020%20single%20lo-res%20%281%29.pdf.
Pandey, D., & Khanna, M. (2023). The role of mothers-in-law in determining women’s work: Evidence from India. Economic Development and Cultural Change. https://doi.org/10.1086/724307.
Patel, V., & Mondal, N. (Eds.). (2022). Gendered inequalities in Paid and unpaid work of women in India. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9974-0.
Rangarajan, C., Kaul, P. I., & Seema (2011). Where is the missing labor force? Economic and Political Weekly, 46(39), 68–72. https://www.epw.in/journal/2011/39/special-articles/where-missing-labor-force.html.
Saeed, M. S. (2005). Status of muslim women in India. Journal of Strategic Studies, 25(3), 118–139.
Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 84(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0126.
Seiz, J. A. (1995). Bargaining models, feminism, and Institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 29(2), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505698.
Singh, P., & Pattanaik, F. (2020). Unfolding unpaid domestic work in India: Women’s constraints, choices, and career. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0488-2.
Srinivasan, K., & James, K. S. (2015). The Golden Cage: Stability of the Institution of Marriage in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(13), 38–45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24481745.
Srivastava, A. (2020). Time Use and Household Division of Labor in India—within-gender dynamics. Population and Development Review, 46(2), 249–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12309.
Stafford, R., Backman, E., & Dibona, P. (1977). The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/351061.
Van der Lippe, T., Treas, J., & Norbutas, L. (2018). Unemployment and the division of housework in Europe. Work Employment and Society, 32(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017690495.
Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557.
Weiß, C. H. (2009). Modelling time series of counts with overdispersion. Statistical Methods and Applications, 18, 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-008-0108-6.
Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. (2016). Gender, Unpaid Labor and Economics. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica, 6(326), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.326.08.
Acknowledgements
This article is a part of PhD dissertation (Balhasan Ali). The author thanks Anjali Bansal, Research Scholar at International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai for her suggestions and inputs during analysis. Authors also acknowledge anonymous reviewers for their suggestions which help to improve manuscript.
Funding
The authors declare that they did not receive any funding for the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical Approval
The Time Use Survey database used in this study is published by the government of India and the data sets are available in public domain. The National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) took ethical approval from Indian Government’s Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation before the survey, and thus this study did not require any ethical clearances. The name and place of the respondents were concealed.
Participant Consent
Since this study is based on a secondary dataset, it does not require consent for participation or publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, B., Prasad, A.B., Dhillon, P. et al. Sustaining the Tradition in Multigeneration Families: Women’s Time Use and Unpaid Domestic Work in India. J Fam Econ Iss (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09948-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09948-w