Financial Compensation for Intra-Familial Long-Term Care and Childcare in Germany
The study examines whether respondents believe that long-term care provided by children for elderly parents and grandparental childcare should be monetarily compensated, and how these results vary by different groups of respondents. Based on a representative survey, the author shows that while 79% of subjects support compensation for long-term care, only 38% of subjects support compensation for grandparental childcare. Older subjects are more likely to accept monetary compensation for both long-term care and grandparental childcare. It is puzzling that being a female does not by itself explain the differences in acceptance, even though females are much more actively involved in all types of time transfers. Implications of the results and directions for future research are suggested.
KeywordsEquity principle Grandparental childcare Intergenerational transfers Long-term care
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Nataliya Kusa declares that she has no conflict of interest.
This analysis is based on the representative GESIS Panel conducted by Leibniz Institute for social sciences in Mannheim, Germany.
Animal and Human Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bengtson, V. L., & Lowenstein, A. (Eds.). (2003). Global aging and challenges to families (life course and aging) (1st ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bettio, F., & Verashchagina, A. (2010). Long-term care for the elderly: provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Luxembourg: EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment.Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer (2007). Health and long-term care in the European Union. Special Eurobarometer 283. European Commission.Google Scholar
- European Union (2012). Long-term care of the elderly: provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Gans, D., Silverstein, M., & Lowenstein, A. (2010). Do religious children care more and provide more care to older parents? A study of filial norms and behaviors across five nations. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(4), 633–638.Google Scholar
- GESIS (2016) GESIS Panel—standard edition. GESIS data archive, Cologne. ZA5665 Data file Version 17.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12709.
- Herlofson, K., Hagestad, G., Slagsvold, B., & Sørensen A.-M. (2011). Intergenerational family responsibility and solidarity in Europe. Multilinks deliverable 4.3. NOVA.Google Scholar
- Husmann, M. (2010). Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen bei grenzüberschreitender Haushalts- und Pflegearbeit. In K. Scheiwe & J. Krawietz (Eds.), Transnationale Sorgearbeit. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und gesellschaftliche Praxis (pp. 29–56). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2010). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728–741.Google Scholar
- Kluzer, S., Redecker, C., & Centeno, C. (2010). Long-term care challenges in an ageing society: The role of ICT and migrants results from a study on England, Germany, Italy and Spain. JRC Working Papers JRC58533, Joint Research Centre (Seville site). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
- Laferrere, A., & Wolff, F. C. (2006). Microeconomic models of family transfers. In S. C. Kolm & J. Mercier-Ytier (Eds.), Handbook on the economics on giving, reciprocity and altruism (Vol. 2, pp. 889–969). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2001). Preparing for an aging world: The Case for Cross National Research. Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World. Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10120.
- OECD (2008). What are equivalence scales? Paris. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf.
- Schmidt, M., & Schneekloth, U. (2011). Abschlussbericht zur Studie “Wirkungen des Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes”. Berlin: Bericht zu den Repräsentativerhebungen im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit.Google Scholar
- Schokkaert, E., & Capeau, B. (1991). Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justice. Kyklos, 44(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1991.tb01758.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sieweck, J. (2011). Branchenreport Erbschaften 2011. Cologne: BBE Media.Google Scholar
- Tobío, C., Tomás, S. A., Gómez, V., & Paloma, T. M. (2010). Caring for others: A challenge for the 21st century. Social Studies Collection No. 28. Barcelona: Fundación “La Caixa”.Google Scholar
- Triantafillou, J., Naiditch, M., Repkova, K., & Stiehr, K. et al. (2010). Informal care in the long-term care system. Interlinks-Project Executive Summary. http://interlinks.euro.centre.org/sites/default/files/WP5%20Informal%20care_ExecutiveSummary_FINAL_1.pdf.