Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 243–257 | Cite as

Economic Insecurity and Fertility: Does Income Volatility Impact the Decision to Remain a One-Child Family?

  • Fady MansourEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study is the first to investigate the economic factors behind the recent rise of the one-child family in the United States. Using longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) that runs from 1968 to 2013 and a variety of different model specifications with state and year fixed effect, including logistic regression, linear probability, and Cox proportional hazard models, the study examined the effect of absolute income volatility on the decision of having an only-child family. The study found that an increase in the standard deviation of income is associated with a decrease in the probability of having a second child for mothers who are in the second quartile of income distribution.

Keywords

Fertility Income volatility Only child 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Fady Mansour declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ananat, E. O., Gassman-Pines, A., & Gibson-Davis, C. (2013). Community-wide job loss andteenage fertility: Evidence from North Carolina. Demography, 50(6), 2151–2171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0231-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Universities National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (Eds.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S., Glaeser, E. L., & Murphy, K. M. (1999). Population and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279-S288. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1840425.
  5. Bernardi, L., Klärner, A., & Von der Lippe, H. (2008). Job insecurity and the timing of parenthood: A comparison between Eastern and Western Germany. European Journal of Population, 24(3), 287–313. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40271508.
  6. Borg, M. O. M. (1989). The income-fertility relationship: Effect of the net price of a child. Demography, 26(2), 301–310. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2061527.
  7. Bram, S. (1975). To have or have not: A social psychological study of voluntarily childless couples, parents-to-be, and parents, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). CPI Detailed Report Data for April 2016 [Report]. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1604.pdf.
  9. Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979a). The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility. The American Economic Review, 69(3), 318–328. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1807367.
  10. Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979b). Will US fertility remain low? A new economic interpretation. Population and Development Review, 5(4), 663–688. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1971976.
  11. Conrad, C., Lechner, M., & Werner, W. (1996). East German fertility after unification: Crisis or adaptation? Population and Development Review, 22(2), 331–358. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137438.
  12. Dynarski, S., Gruber, J., Moffitt, R. A., & Burtless, G. (1997). Can families smooth variable earnings? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 229–303. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:28:y:1997:i:1997-1:p:229-303.
  13. Easterlin, R. A. (1976). The conflict between aspirations and resources. Population and Development Review, 2(3–4), 417–425. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1971619.
  14. Fokkema, T., De Valk, H., De Beer, J., & Van Duin, C. (2008). The Netherlands: Childbearing within the context of a “Poldermodel” society. Demographic Research, 19(21), 743–794.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of ‘lowest-low’ fertility? Population and Development Review, 35(4), 663–699. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25593682.
  16. Gosselin, P., & Zimmerman, S. (2008). Trends in Income Volatility and Risk, 19702004. Retrieved from the Urban Institute website: http://www.urban.org/research/publication/trends-income-volatility-and-risk-1970–2004.
  17. Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1994). The growth of earnings instability in the US labor market. Brookings Papers On Economic Activity, 2(25), 217–272. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2534657.
  18. Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (2007). Trends in Earnings Volatility in the US: 1970–2002. Paper presented to the Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association, Chicago, January 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Haider, S. J. (2001). Earnings instability and earnings inequality of males in the United States: 1967–1991. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(4), 799–836.  https://doi.org/10.1086/322821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, M. (1991). PSID User Guide. Retrieved from https://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/ug/psidguide.pdf.
  21. Hoem, B. (2000). Entry into motherhood in Sweden: The influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility, 1986–1997. Demographic Research, 2, 4.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.4.
  22. Hondroyiannis, G. (2010). Fertility determinants and economic uncertainty: An assessment using European panel data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(1), 33–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9178-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houseknecht, S. K. (1977). Wives but not mothers: Factors influencing the decision to remain voluntarily childless (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University).Google Scholar
  24. Hymans, S. H., Ackley, G., & Juster, F. T. (1970). Consumer durable spending: explanation and prediction. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 173–206. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/bpea-articles/consumer-durable-spending-explanation-and-prediction/.
  25. INE. (2010). Vital Statistics and Basic Demographic Indicators [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/en/prensa/np600_en.pdf.
  26. Kravdal, Ø (2002). The impact of individual and aggregate unemployment on fertility in Norway. Demographic Research, 6(10), 263–294.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livingston, G. (2014). Birth rates lag in Europe and the U.S., but the desire for kids does not. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/04/11/birth-rates-lag-in-europe-and-the-u-s-but-the-desire-for-kids-does-not/.
  28. Livingston, G., & Cohn, D. (2010). US birth rate decline linked to recession. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/04/06/us-birth-rate-decline-linked-torecession/.
  29. Macunovich, D. J. (1996). Relative income and price of time: Exploring their effects on US fertility and female labor force participation. Population and Development Review, 22(Supp.), 223–257. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2808013.
  30. Morgan, S. P., Cumberworth, E., & Wimer, C. (2011). The great recession’s influence on fertility, marriage, divorce, and cohabitation. In D. B. Grusky, B. Western & C. Wimer (Eds.), The great recession (pp. 220–245). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Perelli-Harris, B. (2006). The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in post-Soviet Russia. Population and Development Review, 32(4), 729–753. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20058925.
  32. Ranjan, P. (1999). Fertility behaviour under income uncertainty. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 25–43. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20164053.
  33. Schmidt, S. R. (1999). Long-run trends in workers’ beliefs about their own job security: Evidence from the general social survey. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(4, pt 2), S127–S141. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/209945.
  34. Schneider, D. (2015). The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal Of Marriage And Family, 77(5), 1144–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Has the business cycle changed and why? NBER Macroeconomics Manual, 17, 159–218.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w9127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Giersbergen, N. P. A., & De Beer, J. (1997). Geboorteontwikkeling en consumentenvertrouwen: een econometrische analyse (Birth trends and consumer confidence: An econometric analysis). Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking, 45(11), 23–27. Retrieved from http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/1008526.
  37. Wang, W., & Morin, R. (2009). Home for the holidays…and every other day. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/home-for-the-holidays.pdf.
  38. Willis, R. J. (1974). Economic theory of fertility behavior. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the family (pp. 25–75). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Turner College of BusinessColumbus State UniversityColumbusGeorgia

Personalised recommendations