Abstract
At the intersection of the cohabitation and residential mobility literatures is an opportunity to better understand the factors that shape cohabitation choices for low-income couples. By investigating push and pull factors associated with cohabitation, this study aimed to identify linkages between cohabitation transitions and the broader socioeconomic context within which they occur. Collecting data from both members of low-income couples and carefully tracking all residential and cohabitation transitions made it possible to identify a wide range of push and pull factors that motivate couples to move. The findings suggest that cohabitation transitions were often motivated by economic necessity. Romantic partnerships, while important, were less frequently mentioned than other factors (i.e., interpersonal negotiations, finances, housing quality) in determining a couple’s living arrangements. These findings have important implications for understanding the complex relationship between economic and non-economic factors that shape romantic relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative methods, 5(3), 11–23. doi:10.1177/160940690600500304.
Child Trends (2015). Births to unmarried women: Indicators on children and youth. Retrieved from https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/75_Births_to_Unmarried_Women.pdf.
Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2003). Finding and keeping affordable housing: Analyzing the experiences of single-mother families in North Philadelphia. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(4), 123–140.
Clark, S. L. (2010). Housing instability: Toward a better understanding of frequent residential mobility among America’s urban poor (Report #001–09). Retrieved from the Center for Housing Policy website: http://www.centerforhousingpolicy.org/media/files/LawsonClark_analysis_for_child_mobility.pdf.
Clark, S., Burton, L. M., & Flippen, C. A. (2011). Housing dependence and intimate relationships in the lives of low-income Puerto Rican mothers. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 369–383. doi:10.1177/0192513X10379712.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452230153.
Cross-Barnet, C., Cherlin, A., & Burton, L. (2011). Bound by children: Intermittent cohabitation and living together apart. Family Relations, 60(5), 633–647. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00664.x.
Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. doi:10.1177/1097184X14545993.
Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. J. (2007). Family instability and child wellbeing. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 181–204. doi:10.1177/000312240707200203.
Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., Supkoff, L. M., Heisad, D., Chan, C., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2012). Early reading skills and academic achievement trajectories of students facing poverty, homelessness, and high residential mobility. Educational Researcher, 41, 366–374. doi:10.3102/0013189X12445320.
Ihrke, D. K., Faber, C. S., & Koerber, W. K. (2011). Geographical mobility 2008 to 2009 (Report #P20-656). Retrieved from the U.S. Census website: http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p20-565.pdf.
Jamison, T., & Ganong, L. (2011). “We’re not living together:” Stayover relationships among college-educated emerging adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 536–557. doi:10.1177/0265407510384897.
Jamison, T. B., Ganong, L., & Proulx, C. M. (2017). Unmarried coparenting in the context of poverty: Understanding the relationship between stress, family resource management, and resilience. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 38, 439–452. doi:10.1007/s10834-016-9518-z.
Jelleyman, T., & Spencer, N. (2008). Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 584–592. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.060103.
Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00189.x.
McLanahan, S., & Beck, A. N. (2010). Parental relationships in fragile families. The Future of Children, 20, 17–38. doi:10.1353/foc.2010.0007.
Nepomnyaschy, L., & Teitler, J. (2013). Cyclical cohabitation among unmarried parents in fragile families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1248–1265. doi:10.1111/jomf.12064.
Pettit, B., & McLanahan, S. (2003). Residential mobility and children’s social capital: Evidence from an experiment. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 632–649. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.8403009.
Phinney, R. (2013). Exploring residential mobility among low-income families. Social Service Review, 87, 780–815. doi:10.1086/673963.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1976). The laws of migration. New York: Arno Press Inc.
Reed, J. M. (2006). Not crossing the "extra line": How cohabitors with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1117–1131.
Reid, M., & Golub, A. (2015). Vetting and letting: Cohabiting stepfamily formation processes in low-income Black families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1234–1249. doi:10.1111/jomf.12217.
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 233–258. doi:10.1177/0192513X08324388.
Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.x.
Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2011). Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations, 60, 163–177. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00640.x.
Skobba, K., Bruin, M. J., & Yust, B. L. (2013). Beyond renting and owning: The housing accommodations of low-income families. Journal of Poverty, 12, 234–252. doi:10.1080/10875549.2013.775992.
Solomon-Fears, C. (2014). Nonmarital births: An overview. (CRS Report #R43667) Retrieved from Federation of American Scientists website: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43667.pdf.
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x.
Acknowledgements
There was no funding source for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamison, T.B. Cohabitation Transitions Among Low-income Parents: A Qualitative Investigation of Economic and Relational Motivations. J Fam Econ Iss 39, 73–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9546-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9546-3