Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 66–72 | Cite as

Marriage and State-level Economic Outcomes

  • Robert I. Lerman
  • Joseph PriceEmail author
  • Adam Shumway
  • W. Bradford Wilcox
Original Paper

Abstract

Past research has examined various state-level measures that predict state economic growth and other economic and social indicators. This research has largely ignored the potential role of family structure in contributing to state-level outcomes, despite the extensive literature on links between family structure and economic outcomes at the individual level. We estimated a state-level panel model and found that both the proportion of adults and the proportion of parents who are married are strongly related to important state-level economic outcomes, including economic growth, median household income, median personal income, and poverty.

Keywords

Marriage Economic growth Poverty 

JEL Classification

J12 J13 I24 

Notes

Funding

This paper was funded by a grant from the Home Economics Project of the American Enterprise Institute and the Institute for Family Studies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ahituv, A., & Lerman, R. I. (2007). How do marital status, work effort, and wage rates interact? Demography, 44(3), 623–647. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Family values and the regulation of labor. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 599–630. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P., Patterson S., & Beattie, B. (2015). Single-parent households and children’s educational achievement: A state-level analysis. Social Science Research, 53, 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. (2003). Religion and economic growth. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760–781. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519761?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  6. Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm C. J. (2007). Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity. Law and Economics Workshop. UC Berkeley: Berkeley Program in Law and Economics. Retrieved from  http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3zt2b504.
  7. Budig, M., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657415.
  8. Chernick, H. (2010). Redistribution at the state and local level: Consequences for economic growth. Public Finance Review, 38(4), 409–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chetty, R., & Hendren. N. (2015). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility: Childhood exposure effects and county-level estimates. Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://cms.leoncountyfl.gov/coadmin/agenda/attach/150609/A0905.pdf.
  10. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623. doi: 10.3386/w19843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, I., & Chawdhry, A. (2002). Rent-seeking and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of U.S. states. Cato Journal, 22(2), 211–228. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/catoj22&div=19&g_sent=1&collection=journals#.
  12. Cutler, D. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980s. American Economic Review, 82, 546–551.Google Scholar
  13. Dincer, O., & Uslaner, E. (2010). Trust and growth. Public Choice, 142, 59–67. doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9473-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan, G., Yeung W. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children? American Sociological Review, 63(3), 406–423. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657556.
  15. Ferrara, P. (2014) Why economic growth is exponentially more important than income inequality. Forbes, Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2014/01/14/why-economic-growth-is-exponentially-more-important-than-income-inequality/#17dd75784f1b.
  16. Garcia-Mila, T., & McGuire, T. J. (1992). The contribution of publicly provided inputs to states’ economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(2), 229–241. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(92)90013-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorman, E. (1999). Bringing home the bacon: Marital allocation of income-earning responsibility, job shifts, and men’s wages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 110–122. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353887?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  18. Grossbard, S. (2015) The marriage motive: A price theory of marriage. New York: Springer. Retrieved from https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10805024.
  19. Hanushek, E. A., Ruhose, J., & Woessmann, L. (2015). Human capital quality and aggregate income differences: Developmental accounting for U.S. states. (No. w21295). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21295.pdf.
  20. Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 676–719. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/379217.
  21. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/145924?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  22. Lerman, R. I. (1996). The impact of the changing US family structure on child poverty and income inequality. Economica, 63(250), 119–139. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2554812?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  23. Lerman, R. I. (2011). Economic perspectives on marriage: Causes, consequences, and public policy. In Cohen, L. R. & Wright, J. D. (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Economics of Family Law (pp. 72–95). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Retrieved from https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/research-handbook-on-the-economics-of-family-law?___website=uk_warehouse.
  24. Lerman, R. I. & Wilcox, W. B. (2014). For richer, for poorer. American Enterprise Institute Report. Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/IFS-ForRicherForPoorer-Final_Web.pdf.
  25. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Panizza, U. (2002). Income inequality and economic growth: Evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1013414509803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pantuosko, L., Parker, D., & Stone, G. (2001). The effect of unions on labor markets and economic growth: An analysis of state data. Journal of Labor Research, 22(1), 195–205. doi: 10.1007/s12122-001-1012-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ribar, D. C. (2015). Why marriage matters for child wellbeing. Future of Children, 25(2), 11–27. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43581970?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  29. Sianesi, B., & Reenen, J. V. (2003). The returns to education: Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(2), 157–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas, A., & Sawhill, I. (2005). For love and money? The impact of family structure on family income. Future of Children, 15(2), 57–74. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16158730.
  31. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 628–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilcox, W. B., Anderson, J. R., Doherty, W., Eggebeen, D., Ellison, C. G., Galston, W.,⋯, Wallerstein, J. (2011). Why Marriage Matters, Third Edition: Thirty Conclusions from the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert I. Lerman
    • 1
  • Joseph Price
    • 2
    Email author
  • Adam Shumway
    • 3
  • W. Bradford Wilcox
    • 4
  1. 1.Urban InstituteWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations