Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 463–476 | Cite as

Factors that Determine the Use of Flexible Work Arrangement Practices in Spain

  • Salomé Goñi-Legaz
  • Andrea Ollo-LópezEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the great significance attributed in recent years to flexible work arrangement practices the factors that determine their use are not clear. Drawing on data from a representative sample of workers in Spain, this article shed light on how personal, work, and firm characteristics explain the use of flexible work arrangement practices. Despite general similarity in terms of flexible work arrangement practices strategy, employee characteristics provide the most comprehensive account of the use of part-time work. People with more family responsibilities are those that use more this practice. However, work characteristics enable the most complete profile-description of workers using flexible work arrangement practices. Work characteristics, such as position or high-performance work practices, determine the use of timetable flexibility, timetable set by self, work from home and days off.

Keywords

Flexible work arrangement practices Determinants Work–family interface 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of SEC2007-67737-C03-02/ECON awarded to Salomé Goñi Legaz and ECO2010-213-93-C04-03 awarded to Andrea Ollo López. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of the editor-in-chief of Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Elizabeth M. Dolan, and of the two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work–family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787–810. doi: 10.1177/014920630202800605.Google Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off?. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, M. (2003). Share price reactions to work–family initiatives: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 497–505. doi: 10.2307/30040641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. (2003). Human resources practices as predictors of work–family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 189–220. doi: 10.1111/1468-232X.00287.Google Scholar
  5. Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., & Van Reene, J. V. (2011). Are family–friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 343–367. doi: 10.1002/smj.879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch, G., & Wagner, A. (2003). Service societies in Europe and reasons for service employment growth. Kølner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie and Sozialpsychologie, 55(3), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brough, P., Holt, J., Bauld, R., Biggs, A., & Ryan, C. (2008). The ability of work-life balance policies to influence key social/organisational issues. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 261–274. doi: 10.1177/1038411108095758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2004). Trade unions and family–friendly policies in Britain. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(2), 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2006). Family–friendly work practices in Britain: Availability and perceived accessibility. Human Resource Management, 45(1), 23–42. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burud, S., & Tumolo, M. (2004). Leveraging the new human capital: Adaptive strategies, results achieved and stories of transformation. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Carrasquer, P., Masssó, M., & Artiles, M. A. (2005). Discurso y prácticas sobre la conciliación de la vida laboral y familiar en la negociación colectiva. Revista Universitaria de Ciencias del Trabajo, 6, 265–286.Google Scholar
  13. Chinchilla, N., Poelmans, S., & León, C. (2003). Políticas de conciliación trabajo-familia en 150 empresas españolas. Documento de Investigación no 498, IESE Business School, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. doi: 10.1177/0018726700536001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De la Rica, S., & Ferrero, M. D. (2003). The effects of fertility on labour force participation: The Spanish evidence. Spanish Economic Review, 5, 153–172. doi: 10.1007/s101080300059.Google Scholar
  16. De Laat, J., & Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2011). The fertility and women’s labor force participation puzzle in OECD Countries: The role of men’s home production. Feminist Economics, 17, 87–119. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2011.573484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Luis Carnicer, M. P., Martinez Sanchez, A., Pére Pérez, M., & Vela Jiménez, M. J. (2002). La flexibilidad de la empresa y la conciliación de la vida laboral y familiar. Boletín económico de ICE, 2741, 37–52.Google Scholar
  18. Dew, J. (2008). Themes and trends of Journal of Family and Economic Issues: A review of twenty years (1988–2007). Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 496–540. doi: 10.1007/s10834-008-9118-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dex, S., & Smith, C. (2002). The nature pattern of family friendly employment policies in Britain. United Kingdom: The Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Escot, L., Fernández-Cornejo, J. A., Lafuente, C., & Poza, C. (2012). Willingness of Spanish men to take maternity leave. Do firms` strategies for reconciliation impinge on this? Sex Roles, 67, 29–42. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0142-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eurofound. (2006). Fourth European working conditions survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, J. (2001). Firms’ contribution to the reconciliation between work and family life. OECD Labor Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers no 48. doi:  10.1787/344836028454.
  24. Ezra, M., & Deckman, M. (1996). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and child care in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 56, 174–179. doi: 10.2307/977205.
  25. Fernández-Kranz, D., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2011). Unintended effects of a family–friendly law in a segmented labor market. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5709. Retrieved from http://www.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=5709.
  26. Ferrer, A., & Gagné, L. (2006). The use of family friendly workplace practices in Canada. IRPP Working Paper Series, No. 2006-02, Institute for Research on Public Policy. Retrieved from http://archive.irpp.org/wp/archive/wp2006-02.pdf.
  27. Frye, N. K., & Breaugh, J. A. (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, work–family conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 197–220. doi: 10.1007/s10869-004-0548-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. García-Román, J. (2011). Consecuencias en el tiempo familiar del auge de las parejas de doble ingreso. Un análisis a partir de la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo, 2009–2010. Papers de Demografía, 370, 1–26.Google Scholar
  29. Glass, J. L., & Finley, A. (2002). Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12(3), 313–337. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00063-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Golden, L. (2001). Flexible work schedules: what are we trading off to get them?Monthly Labor Review, 124(3), 50–67. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/03/art3full.pdf.
  31. Goñi-Legaz, S., Ollo-López, A., & Bayo-Moriones, A. (2010). The division of household labor in Spanish dual earner couples: Testing three theories. Sex Roles, 63(7–8), 515–529. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9840-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350–382. doi: 10.2307/256833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenhaus, J., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 391–412). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haddock, S. A., Zimmerman, T. S., & Lyness, K. P. (2006). Practices of dual-earner couples successfully balancing work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 207–234. doi: 10.1007/s10834-006-9014-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hank, K., & Jürges, H. (2007). Gender and the division of household labor in older couples. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 399–421. doi: 10.1177/0192513X06296427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heywood, J., Siebert, W.S., & Wei, X. (2011). Estimating the use of agency workers: can family-friendly practices reduce their use? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 50(3), 535–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.2011.00645.x.
  37. Hill, E.J., Erickson, J.J, Fellows, K.J., Martinengo, G., & Allen, S.M. (2012). Work and family over the life course: Do older workers differ? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Online first. doi:  10.1007/s10834-012-9346-8.
  38. Hyman, J., & Summers, J. (2004). Lacking balance? Work-life employment practices in the modern economy. Personal Review, 33(4), 418–429. doi: 10.1108/00483480410539498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ILO (2004). Making work arrangement more family–friendly. Information sheet No. WF-5 mayo 2004, International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  40. INE. (2011). Nivel de estudios de la población adulta (de 25 a 64 años). https://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/ievaluacion/indicadores/2007/c42007.pdf?documentId=0901e72b8011b5d4.
  41. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization—Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising TideGender equality and cultural change around the world. NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work–family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1466–1487. doi: 10.2307/256866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Instituto de la Mujer (2005). Conciliación de la vida familiar y la vida laboral: Situación actual, necesidades y demandas. Madrid, España: Rumagraf, S.A.Google Scholar
  45. Jokinen, K., & Kuronen, M. (2011). Research on families and family policies in Europe—Major trends. In U. Uhlendorff, M. Rupp & M. Euteneuer (Eds.),Wellbeing of families in Europe. Challenges for research and policy (pp. 13–118). Brussels: Family Platform.Google Scholar
  46. Jones, W. M., & McKenna, J. (2002). Women and work—home conflict: A dual paradigm approach. Health Education, 102, 1–15. doi: 10.1108/09654280210444128.Google Scholar
  47. Kawaguchi, A. (2007). Work-life balance measures and gender division of labor. In A. Masson & M. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Population change, labor markets and sustainable growth: Towards a New Economic Paradigm (Contributions to Economic Analysis, Volume 281) (pp. 189–209). Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kjeldstad, R., & Nymoen, E. (2012). Part-time work and gender: Worker versus job explanations. International Labour Review, 151(1–2), 85–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2012.00136.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knudsen, K., & Waerness, K. (2009). Shared o separate? Money management and changing noms of gender equality among Norwegian couples. Commnunity, Work and Family, 12, 39–55. doi: 10.1080/13668800802009406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Konrad, A., & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 1225–1237. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1225:AID-SMJ135>3.0.CO;2-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lapierre, L. M., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits and problem-focused coping: Implications for work–family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 169–181. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McMillan, H. S., Morris, M. L., & Atchley, E. K. (2011). Constructs of the work/life interface: A synthesis of the literature and introduction of the concept of work/life harmony. Human Resources Development Review, 10, 6–25. doi: 10.1177/1534484310384958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. W., & Rowen, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moreno, A. (2005). Empleo de la mujer y familia en los regímenes de bienestar del sur de Europa en perspectiva comparada. Permanencia del modelo de varón sustentador. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 112, 131–163.Google Scholar
  55. Ollo-López, A., Bayo-Moriones, A., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). The relationship between new work practices and employee effort. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 219–235. doi: 10.1177/0022185609359446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osterman, P. (1995). Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 681–700. doi: 10.2307/2393758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pichler, F. (2009). Determinants of work-life balance: Shortcomings in the contemporary measurement of WLB in large-scale surveys. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 449–469. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9297-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plantenga, J., & Remery, Ch. (2010). Flexible working time arrangements and gender equality. A Comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  59. Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B. (2000). Employees and high performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), 501–531. doi: 10.1111/1467-8543.00178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roehling, P. V., Roehling, M. V., & Moen, P. (2001). The relationship between work-life policies and practices and employee loyalty: A life course perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 141–170. doi: 10.1023/A:1016630229628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rogier, S. A., & Padgett, M. Y. (2004). The impact of utilizing a flexible work schedule on the perceived career advancement potential of women. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 89–106. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Secret, M. (2000). Identifying the family, job and workplace characteristics of employees who use work-family benefits. Family Relations, 49(2), 217–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00217.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swody, C. A., & Powel, G. M. (2007). Determinants of employee participation in organizations’ family–friendly programs: A multi-level approach. Journal of Business Psychology, 22, 111–122. doi: 10.1007/s10869-007-9057-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tausig, M., & Fenwick, R. (2001). Unbinding time: Alternate work schedules and work-life balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 101–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1016626028720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Voicu, M., Voicu, B., & Strapcova, K. (2009). Housework and gender inequality in European countries. European Sociological Review, 25(3), 365–377. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Warren, T., Fox, E., & Pascall, G. (2009). Innovative social policies: Implications for work-life balance among low-waged women in England. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(1), 126–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00433.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C., & Smeaton, D. (2003). High performance management practices, working hours and work life balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), 175–195. doi: 10.1111/1467-8543.00268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wiesman, S., Boeije, H., Van Doorne-Huiskes, A., & Den Dulk, L. (2008). Not worth mentioning: The implicit and explicit nature of decision-making about the division of paid and domestic work. Community, Work & Family, 11(4), 341–363. doi: 10.1080/13668800802361781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood, S., & Albanese, M. T. (1999). Can we speak of a High Commitment Management on the shop floor? Journal of Management Studies, 32(2), 215–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00341.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood, S. J., Menezes, L. M., & Lasaosa, A. (2003). Family–friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 221–249. doi: 10.1111/1468-232X.00288.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Gestión de EmpresasUniversidad Pública de NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations