Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 396–407 | Cite as

Retirement Timing of Dual-Earner Couples in 11 European Countries? A Comparison of Cox and Shared Frailty Models

  • Hanne De Preter
  • Dorien Van Looy
  • Dimitri Mortelmans
Original Paper

Abstract

Retirement is not only an individual decision, it is a decision taken within a family system. The extent to which estimates of retirement predictors are biased by the clustering of older workers (50 years of age or older) into dual-earner households remains unclear. Using longitudinal data on 11 European countries from the first (2004/2005) and second (2006/2007) waves of the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), this study investigated the retirement timing of older workers aged 50+ living in dual-earner households in 11 European countries. We questioned how measures that are significantly related to retirement timing differ according to whether one takes into account the household context in the retirement analysis. The results showed that covariates that are dependent among partners (e.g., household size, educational level) changed the least between the Cox model and the shared frailty model. The effects of controlling for clustering between partners, although fairly modest, appeared to be important as they revealed a systematic pattern in the direction of bias in estimates that assume an independent sample.

Keywords

Dual-earner households Retirement timing Cox models Shared frailty models SHARE 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper uses data from SHARE release 2.5.0, as of May 24 2011. The SHARE data collection was primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th framework programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th framework programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT- 2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th framework programme (SHARE-PREP, 211909 and SHARE-LEAP, 227822). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064, IAG BSR06-11, R21 AG025169) as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions).

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2005). Survival analysis using SAS. A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzoli, G. J. (1985). The early retirement decision: new empirical evidence on the influence of health. The Journal of Human Resources, 20(2), 214–234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/146009.Google Scholar
  3. Beehr, T. A., Glazer, S., Nielson, N. L., & Farmer, S. J. (2000). Work and nonwork predictors of employees’ retirement ages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(2), 206–225. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bingley, P., & Lanot, G. (2007). Public pension programmes and the retirement of married couples in Denmark. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10), 1878–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H. P., & Drobnivc, S. (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary society: From male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J., & Weber, G. (2005). Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: First results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
  9. Bound, J. (1991). Self-reported versus objective measures of health in retirement models. [Article]. Journal of Human Resources, 26(1), 106–138. http://www.jstor.org/stable/145718.
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarkberg, M., & Moen, P. (2001). Understanding the time-squeeze married couples’ preferred and actual work-hour strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1115–1136. doi: 10.1177/0002764201044007005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2008). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–220. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2985181.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 243–267. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 193–196. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182875.
  16. Dahl, S. A., Nilsen, O. A., & Vaage, K. (2003). Gender differences in early retirement behaviour. European Sociological Review, 19(2), 179–198. doi: 10.1093/esr/19.2.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dano, A. M., Ejrnaes, M., & Husted, L. (2005). Do single women value early retirement more than single men? Labour Economics, 12(1), 47–71. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2004.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denaeghel, K., Mortelmans, D., & Borghgraef, A. (2011). Spousal influence on the retirement decisions of single-earner and dual-earner couples. Advances in life Course Research, 16(3), 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denney, J. T. (2010). Family and household formations and suicide in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1), 202–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00692.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dentinger, E., & Clarkberg, M. (2002). Informal caregiving and retirement timing among men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 857–879. doi: 10.1177/019251302236598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duxbury, L., Lyons, S., & Higgins, C. (2007). Dual-income families in the new millennium: Reconceptualizing family type. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 472–486. doi: 10.1177/1523422307305488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dwyer, D. S., & Mitchell, O. S. (1999). Health problems as determinants of retirement: Are self-rated measures endogenous? Journal of Health Economics, 18(2), 173–193. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00034-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elder, G. H. (1999) The life course and aging: Some reflections. Distinguished Scholar Lecture Section on Aging American Sociological Association (pp. 26).Google Scholar
  24. Erickson, J. J., Martinengo, G., & Hill, E. J. (2010). Putting work and family experiences in context: Differences by family life stage. Human Relations, 63(7), 955–979. doi: 10.1177/0018726709353138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ginn, J., & Arber, S. (1996). Gender, age and attitudes to retirement in mid-life. Ageing and Society, 16(1), 27–55. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X00003123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glaser, K., Tomassini, C., & Grundy, E. (2004). Revisiting convergence and divergence: Support for older people in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 64–72. doi: 10.1007/s10433-004-0006-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gustman, A., & Steinmeier, T. (2000). Retirement in dual-career families: A structural model. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(3), 503–545. doi: 10.1086/209968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gustman, A., & Steinmeier, T. (2004). Personal accounts and family retirement (no. w10305). National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, S. S., & MacDermid, S. M. (2009). A typology of dual earner marriages based on work and family arrangements. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(3), 215–225. doi: 10.1007/s10834-009-9156-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Härkönen, J. (2007). Jobless couples in Europe. Comparative studies with longitudinal data. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Hatcher, C. B. (2002). Wealth, reservation wealth, and the decision to retire. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henkens, K., & Van Solinge, H. (2002). Spousal influences on the decision to retire. International Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 55–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20628649.Google Scholar
  33. Henretta, J. C., & O’Rand, A. M. (1983). Joint retirement in the dual worker family. Social Forces, 62(2), 504–520. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2578319.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, E. J., Erickson, J. J., Fellows, K. J., Martinengo, G., & Allen, S. M. (2014). Work and family over the life course: Do older workers differ? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9346-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill, E. J., Märtinson, V. K., Ferris, M., & Baker, R. (2004). Beyond the mommy track: The influence of new-concept part-time work for professional women on work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25(1), 121–136. doi: 10.1023/B:JEEI.0000016726.06264.91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ho, J.-H., & Raymo, J. M. (2009). Expectations and realizations of joint retirement among dual-worker couples. Research on Aging, 31(2), 153–179. doi: 10.1177/0164027508328308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurd, M. D. (1990). The joint retirement decision of husbands and wives. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Issues in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, M. P., Huston, T. L., Gaines, S. O., & Levinger, G. (1992). Patterns of married life among young couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(3), 343–364. doi: 10.1177/0265407592093002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalwij, A., & Vermeulen, F. (2007). Health and labour force participation of older people in Europe: What do objective health indicators add to the analysis? Health Economics, 17(5), 619–638. doi: 10.1002/hec.1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kapur, K., & Rogowski, J. (2007). The role of health insurance in joint retirement among married couples. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(3), 397–408. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25249093.
  41. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kohli, M., Künemund, H., & Lüdicke, J. (2005). Family structure, proximity and contact. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, ageing and retirement-first results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (pp. 164–170). Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute für the Economics of Ageing.Google Scholar
  43. Kreppner, K., & Lerner, R. M. (1989). Family systems and life-span development: Issues and perspectives. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., Hoonakker, P., & Raymo, J. M. (2010). Work and family characteristics as predictors of early retirement in married men and women. Research on Aging, 32(4), 467–498. doi: 10.1177/0164027510364120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lancee, B., & Radl, J. (2012). Social connectedness and the transition from work to retirement. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(4), 481–490. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lemaitre, G. M. P., & Van Bastelaer, A. (1997). International comparisons of part-time work. OECD Economic Studies, 29(II), 139–151.Google Scholar
  47. Loretto, W., & Vickerstaff, S. (2012). The domestic and gendered context for retirement. Human Relations, 66(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1177/0018726712455832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meghir, C., & Whitehouse, E. (1997). Labour market transitions and retirement of men in the UK. Journal of Econometrics, 79(2), 327–354. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00026-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Minnotte, K. L. (2012). Family structure, gender, and the work–family interface: Work-to-family conflict among single and partnered parents. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(1), 95–107. doi: 10.1007/s10834-011-9261-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moen, P. (1996). A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 131–144. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moen, P., Fields, V., Quick, H., & Hofmeister, H. (2000). A life-course approach to retirement and social integration. In K. Pillemer, P. Moen, E. Wethington, & N. Glasgow (Eds.), Social integration in the second half of life (pp. 75–107). Baltimore: The Jopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Moen, P., Huang, Q., Plassmann, V., & Dentinger, E. (2006). Deciding the future. Do dual-earner couples plan together for retirement? American Behavioral Scientist, 49(9), 1–22. doi: 10.1177/0002764206286563.Google Scholar
  53. OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  54. Omariba, D. W. R., Beaujot, R., & Rajulton, F. (2007). Determinants of infant and child mortality in Kenya: An analysis controlling for frailty effects. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(3), 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s11113-007-9031-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Rand, A. M., & Farkas, J. I. (2002). Couples’ retirement timing in the United States in the 1990s: The impact of market and family role demands on joint work exits. International Journal of Sociology, 32(Summer), 11–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20628647.Google Scholar
  56. Orrange, R. M., Firebaugh, F. M., & Heck, R. K. (2003). Managing households. In P. Moen (Ed.), It’s about time: Couples and careers (pp. 153–167). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Parker, S. C., & Rougier, J. C. (2007). The retirement behaviour of the self-employed in Britain. Applied Economics, 39(4–6), 697–713. doi: 10.1080/00036840500447807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pedersen, D. E., & Minnotte, K. L. (2012). Dual earner husbands and wives: Marital satisfaction and the workplace culture of each spouse. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(3), 272–282. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9294-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Phillipson, C. (2002). Transitions from work to retirement: Developing a new social contract. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  60. Piekkola, H. (2008). Flexible pension systems: Postponed retirement and distributional fairness. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, Social Welfare Policies: ENEPRI Research Reports (pp. 1–36): ENEPRI.Google Scholar
  61. Pienta, A. M. (2003). Partners in marriage: An analysis of husbands’ and wives’ retirement behavior. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(3), 340–358. doi: 10.1177/0733464803253587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pienta, A. M., & Hayward, M. D. (2002). Who expects to continue working after age 62? The retirement plans of couples. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(4), S199–S208. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.4.S199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raymo, J. M., & Sweeney, M. M. (2006). Work-family conflict and retirement preferences. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(3), S161–S169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2807972.
  65. Ruhm, C. J. (1996). Gender differences in employment behavior during late middle age. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51(1), S11–S17. doi: 10.1093/geronb/51B.1.S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schils, T. (2008). Early retirement in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom: A longitudinal analysis of individual factors and institutional regimes. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 315–329. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmid, G. (1998). Transitional labour markets: A new European employment strategy. In W. B. f. Sozialforschung (Ed.), Discussion Paper (Vol. FS I 98–206). Berlin.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, D. B., & Moen, P. (1998). Spousal influence on retirement: His, her, and their perceptions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(3), 734–744. http://www.jstor.org/stable/353542.Google Scholar
  69. Szinovacz, M. E., & Deviney, S. (2000). Marital characteristics and retirement decisions. Research on Aging, 22(5), 470–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). ISCED: International standard classification of education. Accessed 25 May, 2013 from http://www.uis.unesco.org/EDUCATION/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx.
  71. Van Gils, W., & Kraaykamp, G. (2008). The emergence of dual-earner couples. A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. International Sociology, 23(3), 345–366. doi: 10.1177/0268580908088894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Solinge, H., & Henkens, K. (2005). Couples’ adjustment to retirement: A multi-actor panel study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(1), S11–S20. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.1.S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Voydanoff, P. (2005). Work demands and work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 707–726. doi: 10.1177/0192513X05277516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wienke, A. (2011). Frailty models in survival analysis. Boca Ration: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  75. Zuba, M., & Schneider, U. (2013). What helps working informal caregivers? The role of workplace characteristics in balancing work and adult-care responsibilities. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34(4), 460–469. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9347-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanne De Preter
    • 1
  • Dorien Van Looy
    • 1
  • Dimitri Mortelmans
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies (CELLO)University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations