Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship Quality Among Young Couples from an Economic and Gender Perspective

Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Less than a third of married couple households in the United States are composed of families with one breadwinner. This is a stark contrast to a mere 40 years ago when men were the primary breadwinner for the majority of households. The goal of this study was to determine how the perception of household chores is related to relationship quality. Specifically we wanted to determine how perception of household chores is related to relationship quality reported by partners from a traditional economic and a gender role theory perspective. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1986 cohort, results indicate that perceived unfairness in household division of chores was predictive of women’s relationship quality, but not men’s. Arguments about affection and money were predictive of relationship quality for both genders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For ease of interpretation, the argument variables were entered as continuous variables in the regression model. Results were not significantly different when the variable was entered as a categorical variable.

  2. Removable of one item (a working wife feels more useful) increased the alpha to 0.71. Regression results were not significantly different with the reduced scale, so all items were retained to be consistent with other studies using the NLSY family attitude scale.

References

  • Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Psychological Review, 60, 58–66. doi:10.2307/2096345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 612–624. doi:10.2307/353949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askari, S. F., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Staebell, S. E., & Axelson, S. J. (2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: Young adults’ expectations for participation in household and child care chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 243–252. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00479.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 36–45. doi:10.1037/a0026608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214. doi:10.1177/0950017007087416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581. doi:10.1177/1350506803010002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K., & Padovic, I. (2000). Changer in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort changes and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 477–487. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657490.

  • Britt, S., Grable, J. E., Nelson Goff, B. S., & White, M. (2008). The influence of perceived spending behaviors on relationship satisfaction. Financial Counseling and Planning, 19(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, S. L., Huston, S. J., & Durband, D. B. (2010). The determinants of money arguments between spouses. Journal of Financial Therapy, 1(1), 41–59. doi:10.4148/jft.v3i1.1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciscel, D. H., Sharp, D. C., & Heath, J. A. (2000). Family work trends and practices: 1971 to 1991. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(1), 23–36. doi:10.1023/A:1009475313602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S., & Shih, K. Y. (2010). Gender and the division of labor. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 401–422). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5-17.

  • Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crohan, S. E. (1996). Marital quality and conflict across the transition to parenthood in African American and White couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 933–944. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/35398.

  • Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed? Family Relations, 42, 323–331. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/585562.

  • Dew, J. P. (2009, November). Financial issues as predictors of divorce. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council on Family Relations, San Francisco.

  • Dew, J., Britt, S. L., & Huston, S. J. (2012). Examining the relationship between financial issues and divorce. Family Relations, 61, 615–628. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00715.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engfer, M. (1988). The interrelatedness of marriage and the mother-child relationship. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationship within families: Mutual influences (pp. 104–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, S. B., Noonan, M. C., & Maume, D. J. (2007). Is work–family policy use related to the gendered division of housework? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 527–545. doi:10.1007/s10834-007-9075-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 866–884. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512–530. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2003). Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics, 10, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hen, W., & Waldfogel, W. (2003). Parental leave: The impact of recent legislation on parent’s leave taking. Demography, 40(2), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman, J., & Leibowitz, A. (1999). Job continuity among new mothers. Demography, 36(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluwer, E. S., & Mikula, G. (2002). Gender-related inequalities in the division of labor in close relationships: A social psychological perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 185–216. doi:10.1080/10463280240000064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2003). Investigating gender differences in the meaning of household chores and child care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 456–473. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00456.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Rothman, A. D., Cobb, R. J., Rothman, M. T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2008). Marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 41–50. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, A. E. (2008). Gender, productivity, and the marital wage premium. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 806–814. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00523.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorensen, M., Wilson, M. E., & White, M. A. (2004). Norwegian families: Transition to parenthood. Health Care for Women International, 25, 334–348. doi:10.1080/07399330490278394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. (2006). The transition to parenthood: Stress, resources, and gender differences in a Chinese society. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 471–488. doi:10.1002/jcop.20110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., Bolland, G., Foxman, R., & Owen, C. (1986). Marital relations during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Reproduction and Infant Psychology, 4, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriage and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76. doi:10.1177/019251395016001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orrange, R. M. (2002). Aspiring law and business professionals’ orientations to work and family life. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 287–317. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023002006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, B. C., & Feldman, H. (1970). Marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K., Saisto, T., Halmesmaki, E., & Nurmi, J. (2006). Couples share similar changes in depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction anticipating the birth of a child. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 781–803. doi:10.1177/0265407506068263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. F., Gottman, J. M., & Carrére, S. (2000). The baby and the marriage: Identifying factors that buffer against decline in marital satisfaction after the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szuchman, P., & Anderson, J. (2011). Spousonomics: Using economics to master love, marriage, and dirty dishes. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353201.

  • Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 638–650. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353566.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Married-couple households by labor force status of spouse: 1990 to 2009. Labor Force, Employment, and Earnings U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0600.pdf.

  • Weagley, R. O., Chan, M., & Yan, J. (2007). Married couples’ time allocation decisions and marital stability. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 507–525. doi:10.1007/s10834-007-9070-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kansas State University, 317 Justin Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Sonya L. Britt

  2. California State University-Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA, 90840-0501, USA

    R. Roudi Nazarinia Roy

Authors
  1. Sonya L. Britt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Roudi Nazarinia Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonya L. Britt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Britt, S.L., Roy, R.R.N. Relationship Quality Among Young Couples from an Economic and Gender Perspective. J Fam Econ Iss 35, 241–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-013-9368-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-013-9368-x

Keywords

search

Navigation