Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 241–250 | Cite as

Relationship Quality Among Young Couples from an Economic and Gender Perspective

  • Sonya L. Britt
  • R. Roudi Nazarinia Roy
Original Paper

Abstract

Less than a third of married couple households in the United States are composed of families with one breadwinner. This is a stark contrast to a mere 40 years ago when men were the primary breadwinner for the majority of households. The goal of this study was to determine how the perception of household chores is related to relationship quality. Specifically we wanted to determine how perception of household chores is related to relationship quality reported by partners from a traditional economic and a gender role theory perspective. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1986 cohort, results indicate that perceived unfairness in household division of chores was predictive of women’s relationship quality, but not men’s. Arguments about affection and money were predictive of relationship quality for both genders.

Keywords

Becker Household chores Perceived fairness 

References

  1. Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Psychological Review, 60, 58–66. doi: 10.2307/2096345.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 612–624. doi: 10.2307/353949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askari, S. F., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Staebell, S. E., & Axelson, S. J. (2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: Young adults’ expectations for participation in household and child care chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 243–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 259–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00479.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 36–45. doi: 10.1037/a0026608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214. doi: 10.1177/0950017007087416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581. doi: 10.1177/1350506803010002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewster, K., & Padovic, I. (2000). Changer in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort changes and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 477–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00477.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657490.
  12. Britt, S., Grable, J. E., Nelson Goff, B. S., & White, M. (2008). The influence of perceived spending behaviors on relationship satisfaction. Financial Counseling and Planning, 19(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  13. Britt, S. L., Huston, S. J., & Durband, D. B. (2010). The determinants of money arguments between spouses. Journal of Financial Therapy, 1(1), 41–59. doi: 10.4148/jft.v3i1.1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33, 106–133. doi: 10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciscel, D. H., Sharp, D. C., & Heath, J. A. (2000). Family work trends and practices: 1971 to 1991. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1009475313602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coltrane, S., & Shih, K. Y. (2010). Gender and the division of labor. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 401–422). New York, NY: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5-17.
  18. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Crohan, S. E. (1996). Marital quality and conflict across the transition to parenthood in African American and White couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 933–944. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/35398.
  20. Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed? Family Relations, 42, 323–331. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/585562.
  21. Dew, J. P. (2009, November). Financial issues as predictors of divorce. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council on Family Relations, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  22. Dew, J., Britt, S. L., & Huston, S. J. (2012). Examining the relationship between financial issues and divorce. Family Relations, 61, 615–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00715.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engfer, M. (1988). The interrelatedness of marriage and the mother-child relationship. In R. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Relationship within families: Mutual influences (pp. 104–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Estes, S. B., Noonan, M. C., & Maume, D. J. (2007). Is work–family policy use related to the gendered division of housework? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 527–545. doi: 10.1007/s10834-007-9075-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 866–884. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353307.Google Scholar
  26. Fuwa, M., & Cohen, P. N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research, 36, 512–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (2003). Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics, 10, 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hen, W., & Waldfogel, W. (2003). Parental leave: The impact of recent legislation on parent’s leave taking. Demography, 40(2), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  31. Klerman, J., & Leibowitz, A. (1999). Job continuity among new mothers. Demography, 36(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kluwer, E. S., & Mikula, G. (2002). Gender-related inequalities in the division of labor in close relationships: A social psychological perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 185–216. doi: 10.1080/10463280240000064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kroska, A. (2003). Investigating gender differences in the meaning of household chores and child care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 456–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00456.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawrence, E., Rothman, A. D., Cobb, R. J., Rothman, M. T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2008). Marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 41–50. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lincoln, A. E. (2008). Gender, productivity, and the marital wage premium. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 806–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00523.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorensen, M., Wilson, M. E., & White, M. A. (2004). Norwegian families: Transition to parenthood. Health Care for Women International, 25, 334–348. doi: 10.1080/07399330490278394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lu, L. (2006). The transition to parenthood: Stress, resources, and gender differences in a Chinese society. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 471–488. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moss, P., Bolland, G., Foxman, R., & Owen, C. (1986). Marital relations during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Reproduction and Infant Psychology, 4, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriage and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76. doi: 10.1177/019251395016001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orrange, R. M. (2002). Aspiring law and business professionals’ orientations to work and family life. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 287–317. doi: 10.1177/0192513X02023002006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rollins, B. C., & Feldman, H. (1970). Marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salmela-Aro, K., Aunola, K., Saisto, T., Halmesmaki, E., & Nurmi, J. (2006). Couples share similar changes in depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction anticipating the birth of a child. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 781–803. doi: 10.1177/0265407506068263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapiro, A. F., Gottman, J. M., & Carrére, S. (2000). The baby and the marriage: Identifying factors that buffer against decline in marital satisfaction after the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szuchman, P., & Anderson, J. (2011). Spousonomics: Using economics to master love, marriage, and dirty dishes. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353201.
  46. Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 638–650. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353566.
  47. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Married-couple households by labor force status of spouse: 1990 to 2009. Labor Force, Employment, and Earnings U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0600.pdf.
  48. Weagley, R. O., Chan, M., & Yan, J. (2007). Married couples’ time allocation decisions and marital stability. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 507–525. doi: 10.1007/s10834-007-9070-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.California State University-Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations