Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a Composite Measure of Green Consumption: An Exploratory Study Using a Korean Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study developed a composite measure of green consumption behaviors, incorporating multiple dimensions of green consumption behaviors. As a result of an extensive literature review, four value orientations were proposed: health-related egoistic value orientation, resource-related egoistic value orientation, altruistic value orientation, and biospheric value orientation. And a composite measure of green consumption which measured green consumption behavior manifesting the suggested value orientations were proposed and empirically tested using a Korean sample. After empirical testing and validating the proposed composite measure according to the measurement validation procedure proposed by Nunnally (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978), the composite measure of green consumption behaviors was revised to three dimensions of green consumption behaviors: health-conscious green consumption behavior, resource-conscious green consumption behavior, and socially conscious green consumption behavior that combined originally suggested altruistic and biospheric value orientations. A multivariate regression analysis was employed to test the usability of the composite measure of green consumption behaviors and to identify the determinants of green consumption behaviors. As hypothesized, the results of regression analysis showed that perceived consumer effectiveness, reference persons, and perceived market situation are significant determinants of green consumption behaviors, and the effects of environmental concern and socioeconomics are limited. Based on these findings, public policy and marketing implications that promote green consumption are also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W. M. (2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Retrieved January 14, 2011 from http://www.cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iuch_future_of_sustanability.pdf.

  • Alwitt, L. F., & Pitts, R. E. (1996). Predicting purchase intention for an environmentally sensitive product. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), 49–64. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(96)70404-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially responsible consumers: Profiles and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 5(2), 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, L., & Lehman, D. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(2), 149–159. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80147-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, S., & Chun, H. J. (2010). Development of the green family’s model. Seoul: Korean Consumer Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17, 51–56. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(88)90022-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I., & Corbin, R. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11(2), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. (1999). Market segmentation of green consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12(2), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived Lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 824–844. doi:10.1177/0013916509352833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 117–146. doi:10.1177/1469540507086422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management. Boston: Ally & Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2008). A framework for pro-environmental behaviours-annexes. Retrieved July 20, 2010 from http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/social/behaviour/.

  • Ellen, P., Wiener, J., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviours. Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 10(2), 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency. (2007). Sustainable consumption and production in South East Europe and Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, (EEA Report 2007/3). Retrieved January 14, 2011 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2007_3.

  • Finisterra do Paco, A. M., & Rapposo, M. L. B. (2008). Determining the characteristics to profile the “green” consumer: An exploratory approach. International Review on Public Nonprofit Marketing, 5(2), 129–140. doi:10.1007/s12208-008-0010-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(3), 133–144. doi:10.1108/07363760610663295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraj-Andres, E., & Martinez-Salinas, E. (2007). Impact of environmental knowledge on ecological consumer behavior: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(3), 73–102. doi:10.1300/J046v19n03_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, A., Barr, S., & Ford, N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37(6), 481–504. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gim, T. (2003). A study of influences on green purchasing with structural equation modeling (SEM). Master’s thesis. Retrieved December 03, 2010 from http://library.snu.ac.kr.

  • Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376–391. doi:10.1108/07363760910988201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. M., Martin, S. K., & Haldeman, V. A. (1994). Using psychometric analysis to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the coping response indices. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 15(3), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K., & Kaur, G. (2006). Role of socio-demographics in segmenting and profiling green consumers: An exploratory study of consumers in Korea. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 107–146. doi:10.1300/J046v18n03_06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, T. (2005). Assessing the reliability and validity of the jump start survey of financial literacy. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(2), 283–294. doi:10.1007/s10834-005-3526-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C., Thyne, M., Alevizou, P., & MacMorland, L. (2009). Comparing sustainable consumption patterns across product sectors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 137–145. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00755.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, M., & McClean, P. (2002). Organic purchasing motivations and attitudes: Are they ethical? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(2), 85–92. doi:10.1046/j.1470-6431.2002.00199.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behavior: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottman, J. A. (1993). Green marketing: Challenges & opportunities. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

  • Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N., Shlu, E., & Shaw, D. (2006). In search of fair trade: Ethical consumer decision making in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 502–514. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00532.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (2001). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Business Strategy & The Environment, 10(4), 187–199. doi:10.1002/bse.292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363–385. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145. doi:10.1177/1469540507086422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 27–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Marcromarketing, 25(1), 76–92. doi:10.1177/0276146705274987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., & McCarty, J. A. (1994). Recycling as a marketing problem: A framework for strategy development. Psychology & Marketing, 11(4), 395–416. doi:10.1002/mar.4220110407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Haugtvedt, C., & Petty, R. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? Psychology and Marketing, 11(4), 359–374. doi:10.1002/mar.4220110405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, S. H., Kim, K., Rha, J. Y., & Choi, S. (2010). Green consumption competency: A conceptual model of its framework and components. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 8(3), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stem, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1043–1088). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (1999). Information, incentives & proenvironmental consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22(4), 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 20(10), 883–902. doi:10.1002/mar.10101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thogersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23(3), 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thogersen, J. (2005). How many consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(2), 143–177. doi:10.1007/s10603-005-2982-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thogersen, J. (2010). Country differences in sustainable consumption: The case of organic food. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 171–185. doi:10.1177/0276146710361926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Keicher, M. (2009). Packaging and proenvironmental consumption behavior: Investigating purchase and disposal decisions for beverages. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 125–146. doi:10.1177/0013916507311140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environmental Behavior, 22, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (1975). Determining the characteristics of socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(12), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Kuhling, J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69, 166–176. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behavior when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31. doi:10.1002/sd.394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda, L., & Deal, D. (2009). Organic and local food consumer behaviour: Alphabet theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 697–705. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00814.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Consumer Science, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Korea

    So-Yun Kim, Jungsung Yeo, Sang Hee Sohn, Jong-Youn Rha & A-young Choi

  2. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, 4380 Palmer Building, Suite 1321, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Shinae Choi

  3. Department of Consumer Sciences, Ohio State University, Campbell Hall, 1787 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Suhyun Shin

Authors
  1. So-Yun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jungsung Yeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sang Hee Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jong-Youn Rha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shinae Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A-young Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suhyun Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Youn Rha.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11.

Table 9 Specific questionnaires and the reliabilities of the independent variables
Full size table
Table 10 Factor analysis across each dimension in green consumption behavior using all items
Full size table
Table 11 Factor analysis across each dimension in green consumption behavior using revised items
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SY., Yeo, J., Sohn, S.H. et al. Toward a Composite Measure of Green Consumption: An Exploratory Study Using a Korean Sample. J Fam Econ Iss 33, 199–214 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9318-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-012-9318-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation