Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 437–448 | Cite as

Marital Quality and Income: An Examination of the Influence of Government Assistance

  • David G. SchrammEmail author
  • V. William Harris
Original Paper


Using data from a random telephone statewide survey in Utah, the associations between income, government assistance and six dimensions of marital quality were explored with a sample of 295 married individuals with incomes below $40,000. Results indicate that income has a main effect on negative interaction and feeling trapped. An interaction of government assistance and income on two dimensions of marital quality was found. Individuals that experienced the combination of earning less than $20,000 per year while receiving government assistance had significantly lower levels of overall marital satisfaction and commitment than individuals receiving government assistance with higher incomes and individuals who have never received government assistance. Implications and possible explanations are discussed.


Government assistance Income Marital quality Money Welfare 


  1. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 612–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassuk, E. L., Weinreb, L. F., Buckner, J. C., Browne, A., Salomon, A., & Bassuk, S. S. (1996). The characteristics and needs of sheltered homeless and low-income housed mothers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 640–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach, S. R. H., Whisman, M. A., & O’Leary, K. D. (1994). Marital therapy for depression: Theoretical foundation, current status, and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 25, 345–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, N. G., Bloom, D. E., & Miller, C. K. (1995). The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages. Demography, 32, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., Flor, D., McCrary, C., Hastings, L., & Conyers, O. (1994). Financial resources, parent psychological functioning, parent co-caregiving, and early adolescent competence in rural two-parent African-American families. Child Development, 65, 590–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark-Nicholas, P., & Gray-Little, B. (1991). Effect of economic resources on marital quality in Black married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2002). Resilience in Midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective, longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America. Hawthorne: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Conger, R. D., Elder, G. H., Jr., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., et al. (1990). Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 643–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2005). Two central roles for couple relationships: Breaking negative intergenerational patterns and enhancing children’s adaptation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 1468–1479.Google Scholar
  14. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Dew, J. (2007). Two sides of the same coin? The differing roles of assets and consumer debt in marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dew, J. (2008a). Debt change and marital satisfaction change in recently married couples. Family Relations, 57, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dew, J. (2008b). Themes and trends of Journal of Family and Economic Issues: A review of twenty years (1988–2007). Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 496–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickey, B., & Azeni, H. (1996). Persons with dual diagnoses of substance abuse and major mental illness: Their excess costs of psychiatric care. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dyk, P. H. (2004). Complexity of family life among low-income and working poor: Introduction to the special issue. Family Relations, 53, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellwood, D. T., & Bane, M. J. (1985). The impact of AFDC on family structure and living arrangements. Research in Labor Economics, 7, 137–207.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson-Davis, C., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grafova, I. (2007). Your money or your life: Managing health, managing money. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gudmunson, C. G., Beutler, I. F., Israelsen, C. L., McCoy, J. K., & Hill, E. J. (2007). Linking financial strain to marital instability: Examining the roles of emotional distress and marital interaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman, S. D., & Duncan, G. J. (1995). The effect of incomes, wages, and AFDC benefits on marital disruption. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, C. A., Stanley, S. M., Glenn, N. D., Amato, P. A., Nock, S. L., Markman, H. J., et al. (2002). Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce (S02096OKDHS). Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  26. Julien, D., Markman, H. J., & Lindahl, K. M. (1989). A comparison of a global and microanalytic coding system: Implications for future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komarovsky, M. (1940). The unemployed man and his family. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabitating mothers. Social Service Review, 78, 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liker, J. K., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (1983). Economic hardship and marital relations in the 1930 s. American Sociological Review, 48, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (2001). Fighting for your marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Mauldin, T. A., & Mimura, Y. (2007). Marrying, unmarrying, and poverty dynamics among mothers with children living at home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 566–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mauldon, J. G., London, R. A., Fein, D. J., Patterson, R., & Bliss, S. (2002). What do they think? Welfare recipients’ attitudes toward marriage and childbearing. Cambridge: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
  33. McLaughlin, D. K., & Lichter, D. T. (1997). Poverty and marital behavior of young women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 582–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mead, L. (1989). The logic of workfare: The underclass and work policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murray, C. (2001). Family formation. In R. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 137–168). Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  36. Notarius, C. I., & Markman, H. J. (1989). Coding marital interaction: A sampling and discussion of current issues. Special issue: Coding marital interaction. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson, K., & Pavetti, L. (1996). Personal and family challenges to the successful transition from welfare to work. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Rogers, S. J., & Amato, P. R. (1997). Is marital quality declining? The evidence from two generations. Social Forces, 75, 1089–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 473–479.Google Scholar
  40. Schramm, D. G. (2006). Individual and social costs of divorce in Utah. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schramm, D. G., Marshall, J. P., Harris, V. W., & George, A. (2003). Marriage in Utah: 2003 baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Workforce Services.Google Scholar
  42. Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergan, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., & Meens, L. D. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skogrand, L., Johnson, A. C., Horrocks, A. C., & DeFrain, J. (2010). Financial management practices of couples with great marriages. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. doi:  10.1007/s10834-010-9195-2.
  44. Smith, T. E., & Graham, P. G. (1995). Socioeconomic stratification family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 930–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stuber, J., & Schlesinger, M. (2006). Sources of stigma for means-tested government programs. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 933–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  48. Thorne, D. (2010). Extreme financial strain: Emergent chores, gender inequality and emotional distress. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tiffin, P. A., Pearce, M., Kaplan, C., Fundudis, T., & Parker, L. (2007). The impact of socio-economic status and mobility on perceived family functioning. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallerstein, J. S. (1996). The psychological tasks of marriage: Part 2. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, L., & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeung, W. J., & Hofferth, S. L. (1998). Family adaptations to income and job loss in the U.S. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Family, Consumer, and Human DevelopmentUtah State UniversityLogan84322-2905USA

Personalised recommendations