Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative research study was to examine how low-income, single mothers manage their family and work lives. Analysis was based on longitudinal data collected from 28 rural, low-income, single mothers across 11 states who were continuously employed over three waves. Four main themes were identified: demands from family and work, resources the mothers used to maintain employment, work-family conflict, and strategies to retain employment. This study concludes that despite all the difficulties, mothers try to utilize their limited resources and adopt strategies for combining family and work life even though their demands and resources vary over time. Mothers employed in the same jobs receive consistent support from families. Implications for child care and leave policies are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.
Bauer, J. W. (2004). Basebook report: Low income rural families, Tracking their well-being and functioning in the context of welfare reform. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
Bernstein, J. (2004). The low-wage labor market: Trends and policy implications. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Work-family challenges for low-income parents and their children (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berry, A. A., Katras, M. J., Sano, Y., Lee, J., & Bauer, J. W. (2008). Job volatility of rural, low-income, mothers: A mixed method approach. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 5–22.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.
Ciabattari, T. (2007). Single mothers, social capital, and work-family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 34–60.
Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management: Principles and applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Golden, L. (2008). Limited access: Disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 86–109.
Harknett, K. (2006). The relationship between private safety nets and economic outcomes among single mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 172–191.
Henly, J. R., Shaefer, H. L., & Waxman, E. (2006). Nonstandard work schedules: Employer-and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs. Social Service Review, 80, 609–634.
Herbst, C. M., & Barnow, B. S. (2008). Close to home: A simultaneous equations model of the relationship between child care accessibility and female labor force participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 128–151.
Heymann, J., Boynton-Jarrett, R., Carter, P., Bond, J., & Galinsky, E. (2002). Work-family issues and low-income families. Retrieved March 5, 2007, from http://www.economythatworks.org/PDFs/ford_analysisfinal.pdf.
Kahn, P. (2005). The work-family time binds of low-income mothers: Nursing aides struggle to care. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 27, 97–111.
Katras, M. J., Zuiker, V. S., & Bauer, J. W. (2004). Private safety net: Childcare resources from the perspective of rural low-income families. Family Relations, 53, 201–209.
Lambert, S. J. (1999). Lower-wage workers and the new realities of work and family. Annals, The American Academic of Political and Social Science, 562, 174–190.
Livermore, M. K., & Powers, R. S. (2006). Employment of unwed mothers: The role of government and social support. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 479–494.
Mammen, S., Lass, D., & Seiling, S. B. (2009). Labor force supply decisions of rural low-income mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 67–79.
Mason, R. (2003). Listening to lone mothers: Paid work, family life, and child care in Canada. Journal of Children & Poverty, 9, 41–54.
Matthews, H. (2006). Child care assistance helps families work: A review of the effects of subsidies receipt on the employment. CLASP. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.clasp.org/publications/ccassistance_employment.pdf.
McCrate, E. (2002). Working mothers in a double bind. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved November 18, 2007 from http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/briefingpapers_124.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pedersen, D. E., Minnotte, K. L., Kiger, G., & Mannon, S. E. (2009). Workplace policy and environment, family role quality, and positive family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 80–89.
Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 981–998.
Presser, H. B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economy: Challenges for American families. New York: Russell Sage.
Radey, M. (2008). The influence of social supports on employment for Hispanic, Black, and White unmarried mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 445–460.
Sahibzada, K., Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., & Kuang, D. (2005). The moderating effects of work-family role combinations and work-family organizational culture on the relationship between family-friendly workplace supports and job satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 820–839.
Simmons, L. A., Braun, B., Wright, D. V., & Miller, S. R. (2007). Human capital, social support, and economic well-being among rural, low-income mothers: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 635–652.
Smith, K. (2007). Employment rates higher among rural mothers than urban mothers. Carsey Institute. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.carseyinstitute.unh.edu/documents/FS_ruralmothers_07.pdf.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246.
Urban, J. A., & Olson, P. N. (2005). A comprehensive employment model for low-income mothers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 101–122.
Voydanoff, P. (2005). The effects of community demands, resources, and strategies on the nature and consequences of the work-family interface: An agenda for future research. Family Relations, 54, 583–595.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Drs. Kathryn Rettig, Catherine Solheim, and Sharon Danes, members of FSoS 8047, the JFEI editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported in part by USDA/CSREES/NRICGP Grants-2001-35401-10215, 2002-35401-11591, 2004-35401-14938. Data were collected in conjunction with the cooperative multi state research project NC-223/NC-1011 Rural Low-Income Families: Tracking Their Well-Being and Functioning in the Context of Welfare Reform. Cooperating states are California, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, and Oregon. Research was also supported by MIN-52-055 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Project and Special Hatch Competitive Funding for Minnesota Rural Families Speak project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Son, S., Bauer, J.W. Employed Rural, Low-Income, Single Mothers’ Family and Work Over Time. J Fam Econ Iss 31, 107–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9173-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9173-8