Skip to main content
Log in

A Typology of Dual Earner Marriages Based on Work and Family Arrangements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Qualitative research has investigated distinct couple types that divide work and family responsibilities based on employment circumstances and relationship characteristics, but such research is not conducive to identifying frequencies of couple types or statistically comparing work-family circumstances across couple types. The current study incorporated both employment and family variables in identifying four distinct dual-earner couple types among respondents from the National Survey of the Changing Workforce. Couple types were compared regarding demographic information, and memberships in couple types were predicted based on this information. Some significant differences emerged that may begin to explain the circumstances and motivations behind selecting certain work-family arrangements, though the more peer-like couples were less distinct and in some ways less economically advantaged than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abroms, L. C., & Goldschneider, F. K. (2002). More work for mother: How spouses, cohabiting partners and relatives affect the hours mothers work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkberg, M., & Moen, P. (2001). Understanding the time squeeze: Married couples’ preferred and actual work-hour strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1115–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, L. A., Seery, B. L., & McKinney, K. (2004). College students’ perceptions of employment-based marital dyad types. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C., & Manke, B. (1997). Development of a typology of dual-earner families: A window into differences between and within families in relationships, roles, and activities. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumas, D. M., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2008). Spillover patterns in single-earner couples: Work, self-care, and the marital relationship. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flouri, E., & Buchanan, A. (2002). Childhood predictors of labor force participation in adult life. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gager, C. T., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2006). Distributive justice in the household: A comparison of alternative theoretical models. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, L. (2008). Limited access: Disparities in flexible work schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, S. A., Zimmerman, T. S., Ziemba, S. J., & Lyness, K. P. (2006). Practices of dual earner couples successfully balancing work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. J., Martinson, V. K., Ferris, M., & Baker, R. Z. (2004). Beyond the mommy track: The influence of new-concept part-time work for professional women on work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., Huston, T. L., Gaines, S. O., & Levinger, G. (1992). Patterns of married life among young couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, P. M., & Shafer, R. B. (1998). Marital types and quality of life: A reexamination of a typology. Marriage and Family Review, 27, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., Kagan, C., Heaton, P., & Cranshaw, M. (1999). Economic and psychological benefit from employment: The experiences and perspective of mother of disabled children. Disability & Society, 14, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monna, B., & Gauthier, A. H. (2008). A review of the literature on the social and economic determinants of parental time. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 634–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murasko, J. E. (2008). Married women’s labor supply and spousal health insurance coverage in the United States: Results from panel data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, B. (2004). Do mothers work to support ailing husbands? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., Seery, B., & Crouter, A. C. (1992). Linkages between women’s provider-role attitudes, psychological well-being, and family relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimlott-Kubiak, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2003). Gender, victimization, and outcomes: Reconceptualizing risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 66–103). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, V. C. (1987). Fair vs. equal role relations in dual-career and dual-earner families: Implications for family interventions. Family Relations, 36, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B. J., & Johnson-Sumerford, D. (1998). Doing it fairly: A study of postgender marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Still, M. C. (2006). The opt-out revolution in the United States: Implications for modern organizations. Managerial & Decision Economics, 27, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. E. (2008). Parenthood and commitment to the legal profession: Are mothers less committed than fathers? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 478–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White-Means, S., & Chollet, D. (1997). Opportunity wages and workforce adjustments: Understanding the cost of in-home elder care. Journal of Gerontological Social Science, 51, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott S. Hall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, S.S., MacDermid, S.M. A Typology of Dual Earner Marriages Based on Work and Family Arrangements. J Fam Econ Iss 30, 215–225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9156-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-009-9156-9

Keywords

Navigation