Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 427–444 | Cite as

The Labor Market Participation of Sandwich Generation Italian Women

  • Laura PaganiEmail author
  • Anna Marenzi
Original Paper

Abstract

We empirically analyzed the labor market participation of Italian women, with special emphasis on the role of intergenerational family links. Older relatives, on the one hand, discourage the work participation of women by requiring care; on the other hand they may provide household services favoring labor supply. We studied this dual impact estimating a trivariate probit model where the three choices to be in the labor force, to use informal help from older relatives and to care for them are jointly determined. Our estimates show that care duties towards members of the previous generation hinder the labor market participation of Italian women, and that informal help received from older relatives strongly increases their probability of being engaged in paid work.

Keywords

Female labor supply Intergenerational links 

References

  1. Addabbo, T. (1999). Labor supply and employment probabilities in Italy: A gender analysis in a regional perspective. Economia e Lavoro, 33, 189–207.Google Scholar
  2. Banca D’Italia. (2002). I bilanci delle famiglie italiane nell’anno 2000. Supplemento al Bollettino Statistico. Note metodologiche e Informazioni Statistiche. Roma: Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 7, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettio, F., & Villa, P. (1999). To what extent does it pay to be better educated? Education and market work for women in Italy. South European Society and Politics, 4, 150–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratti, M. (2003). Female labor force participation and marital fertility of Italian women: The role of education. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 525–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning, M. (1992). Children and household economic behavior. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1434–1475.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, K. W. (1990). Work and leisure: How the household spends its time. In The economic organization of the household (pp. 125–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cappellari, L., & Jenkins, P. S. (2003). Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal, 3, 221–222.Google Scholar
  9. Caputo, R. K. (2002). Adult daughters as parental caregivers: Rational actors versus rational agents. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, C., & White-Means, S. I. (1995). Labor supply of informal care-givers. International Review of Applied Economics, 9, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiuri, M. C. (2000). Quality and demand of child care and female labor supply in Italy. Labour, 14, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Boca, D. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution of resources and labor market participation decisions. In I. Persson & C. Jonung (Eds.), Economics of the family and family policies (pp. 65–83). London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  13. Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 549–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Boca, D., Locatelli, M., & Pasqua, S. (2000). Employment decisions of married women: Evidence and explanation. Labour, 14, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ettner, L. S. (1995). The impact of “parent care” on female labor supply decisions. Demography, 32, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ettner, L. S. (1996). The opportunity cost of elder care. Journal of Human Resources, 31, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed., pp. 931–933). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, E. J., Märtinson, V. K., Ferris, M., & Zenger Baker, R. (2004). Beyond the mommy track: The influence of new-concept part-time work for professional women on work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 25, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunts, H. J. H., & Avery, R. J. (1998). Relatives as child care givers: After hours support for nontraditional workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Istat. (2001). Parentela e reti di solidarietà. Indagine Multiscopo sulle famiglie. Aspetti della vita quotidiana: anno 1998 [Kin and solidarity networks. Family survey. Aspects of everyday life: Year 1998]. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  21. Joesch, J. M. (1998). Where are the children? Extent and determinants of preschoolers’ child care time. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koh, S., & MacDonald, M. (2006). Financial reciprocity and elder care: Interdependent resource transfers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 420–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolodinsky, J., & Shirey, L. (2000). The impact of living with an elder parent on adult daughter’s labor supply and hours of work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai, D. W. L., & Leonenko, W. (2007). Effects of caregiving on employment and economic costs of Chinese family caregivers in Canada. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meeks, C. B., Nickols, S. Y., & Sweaney, A. L. (1999). Demographic comparisons of aging in five selected countries. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakamura, A., & Nakamura, M. (1992). The econometrics of female labor supply and children. Econometric Reviews, 11, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nichols, L. S., & Junk, V. W. (1997). The sandwich generation: Dependency, proximity, and task assistance needs of parents. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18, 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Higgins, N. (1994). YTS, employment, and sample selection bias. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 605–628.Google Scholar
  29. Presser, H. B. (1989). Some economic complexities of child care provided by grandmothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 581–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribar, D. C. (1992). Child care and labor supply of married women: Reduced form evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossetti, S., & Tanda, P. (2000). Human capital, wages and family interactions. Labour, 14, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tanda, P. (1994). Partecipazione femminile in Italia: evidenza empirica su dati individuali [Female participation in Italy: Empirical evidence on individual data]. Economia e Lavoro, 28, 123–134.Google Scholar
  33. Visco, I. (2000). Welfare, invecchiamento della popolazione e lavoro: una prospettiva OCSE [Welfare, population aging and work: An OECD prospect]. Moneta e Credito, 209, 55–85.Google Scholar
  34. Wolf, D. A., & Soldo, B. J. (1994). Married women’s allocation of time to employment and care of elderly parents. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 1259–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia PoliticaUniversità di Milano BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Università dell’InsubriaVareseItaly

Personalised recommendations