Managing Conflicting Roles: A Qualitative Study with Female Faculty Members
- 319 Downloads
The interface and transactions between the roles individuals need to play in their family and employment environments are a source of both positive and negative stressors for women, their employers, and family members. Drawing on interviews with female faculty members working in three types of higher education institutions in Michigan, the paper first suggests that female faculty members’ current employment-household management is influenced by past decisions. In addition, the complexity of their family and employment careers positively and negatively influences their lives.
KEY WORDS:employment-family interface qualitative study women in academia.
This research was supported by the Capes Foundation, Ministry of Education, Brazil. This article is part of a PhD dissertation entitled “Toward an integrated family–employment management theory: A qualitative analysis of female faculty members working in higher education institutions,” 2003, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
- American Association of University Professors – AAUP (2002). Quite good news for now: The annual report on the economic status of the profession 2001–02. Academe 1: 21–29Google Scholar
- Alcorn C. E. (2001). Career developmental differences in coping with stress related to work-family interfaceDissertation Abstracts International: The Sciences and Engineering, 16(10B): 5618Google Scholar
- Bokemeier, J. L., Lorentzen, J. M., Morash, L. A. (1996). Michigan families and the work-family interface. (MSU State of the State Survey, Briefing Paper No. 95–13). Retrieved July 8, 2002, from http://ippsr.msu.edu/PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- Brockwood, K. (2002). An examination of positive work-family spillover among dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
- Drago, R., & Colbeck, C. (2002). Exploring the terrain of U.S. colleges and universities for faculty and families. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from http://lsir.la.psu.edu/workfam/mappingproject.htmGoogle Scholar
- Greenhaus J. H., Callanan G. A. (1994). Career management. Fort Worth, TX, Dryden PressGoogle Scholar
- Klein D. M., White J. M. (1996). Family theories: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
- Lombardi J. V., Craig D. D., Capaldi E. D., Gater D. S., & Mendonça S. L. (2001). The top ten American universities. Retrieved on August 26, 2002, from http://thecenter.ufl.edu/research2001.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Marshall C., Rossman G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
- Perna, L.W. (2004, Winter). The relationship between family responsibilities and career outcomes for women and men faculty. CSWEP Newsletter, 12–14. Retrieved on January 26, 2005, from http://www.cswep.orgGoogle Scholar
- Rayman, P., Carré, F., Cintron, L., Quinn, S. (2002). Life’s work: Generational attitudes toward work and life integration. Retrieved on March 10, 2003, from http://www.Radclife.edu/pubpolGoogle Scholar
- Rowland V. T., Dodder R. A., Nickols S. Y. (1985). Perceived adequacy of resources: Development of a scaleHome Economics Research Journal 14: 218–225Google Scholar
- Small S. A., Riley D. (1990). Toward a multidimensional work-family interfaceJournal of Vocational Behavior 50: 145–167Google Scholar
- Townsend, B. (2002). Dual-earner couples and long work hours: A structural and life course perspective. Bronfenbrenner Life Course Center Working Paper #02–11, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
- Varner A. (2000). The consequences and costs of delaying attempted childbirth for women faculty. The Faculty and Family Projects, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PAGoogle Scholar
- Young D. S., Wright E. M. (2001). Mothers making tenureJournal of Social Work Education 37: 555–568Google Scholar