Abstract
Global education agendas and scholarly literature are increasingly focused on systems change in education, in part stemming from a concern around student learning. But there is less attention in the literature about cultural change, meaning the everyday narratives, norms, values, and purposes that get enacted and reshaped within education systems. This paper examines everyday cultural practices in schools and in the social arena that contribute to and inhibit efforts toward education system change in Vietnam. It examines the contested narratives, including values and purposes of schooling and goals for learning, that circulate among policymakers, principals, and teachers. The authors draw on data from their long-term engagement with the education system in Vietnam, as well as a mixed methods study of the education system over six years. We show the shared narratives as well as the contestations around learning, pointing to changes that are occurring in the Vietnamese education system. However, a key component of cultural change—a deliberative dialogue that can shift norms and practices—is insufficiently attended to amidst other technical and policy efforts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our findings contained numerous quotes from interviews with teachers and principals. Our use of quotes from qualitative analysis is to emphasize participants’ perspectives on education, specific reforms, and change in beliefs and practices in the findings. Reviewers have suggested that we give some indication of the quantity of participants who voiced these ideas. In the upcoming sections, when referring to teachers and principals’ quotes in the findings, we use ‘some’ to indicate that between 30–50% of respondents, and ‘many’ to indicate that 70% or more of respondents said these main ideas.
Pseudonyms are used when discussing policymakers’ opinions in the findings.
In our work with VNIES/MOET, we saw several versions of competencies and we learned how they engaged with experts from other countries, i.e. Australia, to understand how to rethink the curriculum—and the purpose of education more broadly.
References
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2012). Complicating the concept of culture. Comparative Education, 48(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.634285
Blackmore, J. (1995). Policy as dialogue: Feminist administrators working for educational change. Gender and Education, 7(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259550039013
Caneiro, P., Glewwe, P., Guha, A., & Krutikova, S. (2021). What determines teacher quality in a high-performing education system? Value-added estimates for primary schools in Vietnam. RISE Working Paper Series.
Chau, Q., Nguyen, C. H., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). The emergence of private higher education in a communist state: The case of Vietnam. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 888–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817890
Dang, H. A. H., Glewwe, P., Lee, J. & Vu, K. (2022). The impact evaluation of Vietnam’s Escuela Nueva (New School) program on students’ cognitive and non-cognitive skills. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
Dimmock, C., Tan, C. Y., Nguyen, D., Tran, T. A., & Dinh, T. T. (2021). Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302
Fry, G. W., & Huong, P. L. (2011). Vietnam as an outlier: Tradition and change in education. In C. Brock & L. Symaco (Eds.), Education in Southeast Asia (pp. 221–243). Symposium Books.
Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9003-9
Glewwe, P. (2002). Schools and skills in developing countries: Education policies and socioeconomic outcomes. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 436–482. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161258
Glewwe, P., & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 2, pp. 945–1017). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02016-2
Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2000). Educational change in Thailand: Opening a window onto leadership as a cultural process. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430050011425
Ho, N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T., Ngo, H., & Nguyen, T. T. (2018). The development of critical thinking for students in Vietnamese schools: From policies to practices. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-5-10
Le, H. M. (2018). The reproduction of ‘best practice’: Following Escuela Nueva to the Philippines and Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.02.005
Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: A Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Le, V. A., & Hoang, H. P. (2022). Basic education in Vietnam. In L. P. Symaco & M. Hayden (Eds.), International Handbook on Education in South East Asia (pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8136-3_38-1
London, J. D. (2006). Vietnam: The political economy of education in a “socialist” periphery. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790600607770
London, J. D. (2011). Contemporary Vietnam’s education system: Historical roots, current trends. In J. D. London (Ed.), Education in Vietnam (pp. 1–56). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
London, J. D. (2021). Outlier Vietnam and the problem of embeddedness: Contributions to the political economy of learning. RISE Working Paper Series, 21/062. RISE Programme. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2021/062.
Morris, P. (2015). Comparative education, PISA, politics and educational reform: A cautionary note. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1027510
Ngo, C. L., & Cao, X. L. (2021). Ho Chi Minh’s educational ideology and its meaning in education innovation in Vietnam today. Revista De Investigaciones Universidad Del Quindío, 33(1), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol33n1.560
Nguyen, C. D., & Trent, J. (2020). Community perceptions as a source of knowledge for transforming teaching and teacher education in Vietnam. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733401
OECD. (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264245914-en
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006032000162020
Pritchett, L. (2015). Creating education systems coherent for learning outcomes: Making the transition from schooling to learning. RISE Working Paper Series 15/005.
Reid, A. (2020). Changing Australian education: How policy is taking us backwards and what can be done about it. Routledge.
Rincón-Gallardo, S. (2019). Liberating learning: Educational change as social movement. Routledge.
Saito, E., Khong, T. D. H., & Tsukui, A. (2012). Why is school reform sustained even after a project? A case study of Bac Giang Province. Vietnam. Journal of Educational Change, 13(2), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9173-y
Saito, E., & Tsukui, A. (2008). Challenging common sense: Cases of school reform for learning community under an international cooperation project in Bac Giang Province. Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.12.006
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). New directions in policy borrowing research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9442-9
Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. University of Chicago Press.
Tran, N. G., Ha, X. V., & Tran, N. H. (2023). EFL reformed curriculum in Vietnam: An understanding of teachers’ cognitions and classroom practices. RELC Journal, 54(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211043670
Truong, T. D., Hallinger, P., & Sanga, K. (2017). Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam: Exploring the influence of culture on principal decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607877
Tsukui, A., Saito, E., Sato, M., Michiyama, M., & Murase, M. (2017). The classroom observations of Vietnamese teachers: Mediating underlying values to understand student learning. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1284055
Vavrus, F. (2009). The cultural politics of constructivist pedagogies: Teacher education reform in the United Republic of Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.05.002
Vu, K. & Glewwe, P. (2022). The impact evaluation of Vietnam’s Escuela Nueva on learning behaviors and parental engagement. Unpublished manuscript.
Vu, K., Dao, V., DeJaeghere, J., & Glewwe, P. (2024). Collaborative learning in the Vietnam Escuela Nueva model and students’ learning behaviors: A mixed methods longitudinal study. Available at SSRN 4507411. [Manuscript submitted for publication]
Walker, A., & Truong, T. D. (2018). Confucian values and Vietnamese school leadership. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp. 224–229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_248
Wössmann, L., Lüdemann, E., Schütz, G. & West, M. R. (2007). School accountability, autonomy, choice, and the level of student achievement: International evidence from PISA 2003. OECD Education Working Papers. No. 13. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/246402531617.
Yakavets, N., Winter, L., Malone, K., Zhontayeva, Z., & Khamidulina, Z. (2022). Educational reform and teachers’ agency in reconstructing pedagogical practices in Kazakhstan. Journal of Educational Change, 24, 727–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-022-09463-5
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the policymakers, principals, and teachers who participated in this study, and the research team at Viện Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam (Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences) who helped collect data and assisted with transcription in preparation for analysis. Our thanks also go to Dr. Bich-Hang Duong for providing feedback on the first draft of this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by Oxford Policy Management, Grant No A0268 RISE Directorate, POI 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
DeJaeghere, J., Dao, V. & Nguyen, T. Education systems change: cultural beliefs and practices that support and inhibit deep learning in Vietnam. J Educ Change (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09505-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09505-0