Abstract
This reflective essay describes one fourth-grade class’s efforts to engage in place-based inquiry regarding food access in response to COVID-19 pandemic recovery efforts. Through this reporting, the author presents the following set of orientations that recognize the inescapable role that place has in teaching and learning and that positions educational settings as sites of resistance, hope, and transformation: (1) building upon diversity of experiences and interests; (2) bridging past to present realities and local to global forces; and (3) encouraging pausing and sense of uncomfortabilty as precursors for action. In such a way, these orientations for place-based study support ongoing calls of utilizing this pivotal moment – the transition and recovery of the COVID-19 pandemic – to reimagine teaching, learning, and schooling in ways that resist matrices of oppression and create possible, liberatory futures in society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarado, J. (2022). A family-school liaison’s negotiation of racialized scripts for family engagement. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 25(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554589221110846
Alvarado, J., & Butler, A. (2023). Close and desirable for whom? Parents traversing racialised spaces and places in gentrifying US schools. Educational Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2023.2235049
Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing. California (Vol. 21). University of California Press.
Lin, G. (2016). March). The windows and mirrors of your child’s bookshelf [Video]. TED Talk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wQ8wiV3FVo
McKittrick, K. (2006). Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. University of Minnesota Press.
Patel, L. (2016). Pedagogies of resistance and survivance: Learning as marronage. Equity and Excellence in Education, 49(4), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1227585
Sojoyner, D. M. (2017). Another life is possible: Black fugitivity and enclosed places. Cultural Anthropology, 32(4), 514–536. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.4.04
Thomson, P. (2007). Working the invisible geographies of school exclusion. In K. N. Gulson & Symes, C. (Ed.). Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matter (pp. 111–130). Routledge.
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2014). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarado, J. Resituating place within learning in schools as COVID-19 response. J Educ Change 25, 223–230 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09495-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09495-5
