Skip to main content

Team emotion matters: exploring teacher collaboration dynamics over time

Abstract

Teachers’ engagement in educational reform is an emotional process, yet the emotional dimensions of school improvement efforts remain understudied. This paper explores the emotional experiences of two teacher teams navigating a reform centering collaboration for instructional improvement. Drawing on group emotion (Kelly and Barsade in Org Behav Hum Decis Process 86(1):99–130, 2001) as a conceptual framework, this paper illustrates how individual beliefs and dispositions, group norms, and broader contextual factors mediate group emotion and engagement in reform over time. Findings indicate that leaders should attend to how teacher turnover impacts group emotion and engagement in capacity-building, particularly when teachers lose team members who have previously driven productive collaborative planning. Findings also highlight the nested nature of grade-level collaboration, revealing the influential role of department norms and relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Vangrieken et al. (2015) for a systematic literature review providing an overview of the terminology used to describe teacher collaboration.

  2. 2.

    Socioeconomically Disadvantaged students are defined as students: (1) who are eligible for the free or reduced-price meal (FRPM) program or (2) who are migrant, homeless, or foster youth, or (3) where neither of the parents were a high school graduate (State Department of Education, 2018).

References

  1. Boler, M., & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding differences. In P. Tryfonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social justice (pp. 110–136). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Datnow, A. (2018). Time for change? The emotions of teacher collaboration and reform. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(3), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2019). Professional collaboration with purpose: Teacher learning for equitable and excellent schools. Routledge.

  4. Denzin, N. (1984). On Understanding Emotion. Jossey Bass.

  5. Diamond, J. B., & Cooper, K. (2007). The uses of testing data in urban elementary schools: Some lessons from Chicago. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 241–263). Blackwell.

  6. DuFour, R. (2007). Professional learning communities: A bandwagon, an idea worth considering, or our best hope for high levels of learning? Middle School Journal, 39(1), 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hargreaves, A. (1994), Changing teachers, changing times. Teachers College Press.

  9. Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hargreaves, A. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive educational change: Emotional responses of teachers and implications for leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24(3), 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior: Vol. 14. Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 151–177). Sage.

  12. Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., & Shirrell, M. (2018). Designing educational infrastructures for improvement: Instructional coaching and professional learning communities. In S. Yoon & K. Baker-Doyle (Eds.), Networked by design (pp. 192–213). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A Review. . Zeitschrift Fur Padagogik, 52(2), 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Little, J. W. (1996). The emotional contours and career trajectories of (disappointed) reform enthusiasts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lockton, M., Weddle, H., & Datnow, A. (2019). When data don’t drive: Teacher agency in data use efforts in low-performing schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement31(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. ed. Sage.

  21. Nias, J. (1993). Changing times, changing identities: Grieving for a lost self. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Educational research and evaluation: For policy and practice (pp. 139–156). Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of Title 1 schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saunders, R. (2013). The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 14(3), 303–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sebring, P. B., & Bryk, A. S. (2000). School leadership and the bottom line in Chicago. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(6), 440–443.

    Google Scholar 

  27. State Department of Education (2018). Accountability Report.

  28. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsang, K. K., & Kwong, T. L. (2017). Teachers’ emotions in the context of education reform: Labor process theory and social constructionism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(6), 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weddle, H., Lockton, M., & Datnow, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration, differing expectations, and emotions in school improvement: “It’s always take, take, take.” Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 4(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-03-2019-0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wood, D. (2007). Teachers’ learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo?. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 699–739.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yin, R. E. (2018). Case study research and its applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

  36. Zembylas, M., & Barker, H. B. (2007). Teachers’ spaces for coping with change in the context of a reform effort. Journal of Educational Change, 8(3), 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zembylas, M., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Research on teachers’ emotions in education: Findings, practical implications and future agenda. In A. Schultz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 367–377). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Zembylas, M. (2010). Teacher emotions in the context of educational reforms. In A. Hargreaves, M. Fullan, A. Lieberman, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (2nd ed. pp. 221–236). Springer.

  39. Zorn, D., & Boler, M. (2007). Rethinking emotions and educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(2), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayley Weddle.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 2 Codebook

2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weddle, H. Team emotion matters: exploring teacher collaboration dynamics over time. J Educ Change (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09436-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Teacher collaboration
  • Capacity building
  • School improvement
  • Emotions