Opening or closing doors for students? Equity and data use in schools
Ensuring equitable opportunities and outcomes for all students is a top priority of many educators and policymakers across the globe. Data use can be an important lever for achieving equity, but how this can occur is not well understood. In this article, we draw upon knowledge gained in a decade of in-depth qualitative research to examine the ways in which data use helps to open or close doors for students. We discuss data use practices that influence equity goals: (1) accountability-driven data use and data use for continuous improvement; (2) using data to confirm assumptions and using data to challenge beliefs, and (3) tracking and flexible grouping to promote student growth. Along each of these dimensions, there are active decision makers, complex processes of data use at play, and a great deal of variation both within and across contexts. Ultimately, educators and policymakers are faced with critical choices regarding data use that can profoundly affect students’ daily educational experiences and trajectories.
KeywordsData use Equity Accountability
We gratefully acknowledge the Spencer Foundation’s support of our recent research on data use and instructional differentiation. We also wish to thank New Schools Venture Fund for their support of our early studies of data use in 2006–2008.
- Christman, J. B., Neild, R. C., Bulkley, K., Blanc, S., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., & Travers, E. (2009). Making the most of interim assessment data. Lessons from Philadelphia. Retrieved on April 24, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505863.pdf.
- Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(4), 173–206.Google Scholar
- Daly, A. J. (2012). Data, dyads, and dynamics: Exploring data use and social networks in educational improvement. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 110305.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., Choi, B., Park, V., & St. John, E. (2018). Teacher talk about student ability and achievement in the era of data-driven decision making. Teachers College Record, 120(4), 1–34.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). School system strategies for supporting data. In T. Kowalski & T. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making for education (pp. 191–206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2014). Data-driven leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy, B. (2008). Acting on data: How urban high schools use data to inform instruction. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance, USC Rossier School of Education.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high performing districts use data to improve instruction for elementary school students. Los Angeles, CA: Center on Educational Governance, USC Rossier School of Education.Google Scholar
- Davidson, K. L., & Frohbieter, G. (2011). District adoption and implementation of interim and benchmark assessments (Report No. 806). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).Google Scholar
- Dowd, A. (2005). Data don’t drive: Building a practitioner-driven culture of inquiry to assess community college performance. Boston: University of Massachusetts, Lumina Foundation for Education.Google Scholar
- Firestone, W. A., & González, R. A. (2007). Culture and processes affecting data use in school districts. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. Yearbook of the National Society for the study of education (pp. 132–154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (1999). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform, and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Goertz, M. E., Nabors Oláh, L., & Riggan, M. (2010). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction (CPRE Research Report No. RR-65). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
- Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2007). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 159–193.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
- Heppen, J., Jones, W., Faria, A., Sawyer, K., Lewis, S., Horwitz, A., et al. (2012). Using data to improve instruction in the Great City Schools: Documenting current practice. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research and The Council of Great City Schools.Google Scholar
- Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs and supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–36.Google Scholar
- Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Special Issue on transforming data into knowledge: Applications of data-based decision making to improve instructional practice. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-Risk, 10(3), 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lai, M. K., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). In-service teacher professional learning: Use of assessment in data-based decision-making. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 77–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (Eds.). (2008). Data driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48.Google Scholar
- Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- McNeil, L. (2002). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McNeil, L. M. (2005). Faking equity: High-stakes testing and the education of Latino youth. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How” Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 57–111). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Means, B., Padilla, C., DeBarger, A., & Bakia, M. (2009). Implementing data-informed decision making in schools—Teacher access, supports and use. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.Google Scholar
- Neuman, S. B. (2016). Code red: The danger of data-driven instruction. Educational Leadership, 74(3), 24–29.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570–608). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J., Wells, A. S., Jones, M., & Datnow, A. (1997). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 482–510.Google Scholar
- Park, V. (2018). Data conversation moves: Towards data-informed leadership for equity and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769050.
- Pollock, M. (2017). Schooltalk: Rethinking what we say to—And about—Students every day. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
- Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. (2015). Factors influencing the functioning of data teams. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 040310.Google Scholar
- Shepard, L., Davidson, K., & Bowman, R. (2011). How middle school mathematics teachers use interim and benchmark assessment data (CSE Technical Report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).Google Scholar
- Shirley, D. (2017). The new imperatives of educational change: Achievement with integrity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Snodgrass Rangel, V., Bell, E., & Monroy, C. (2017). Teachers’ sensemaking and data use implementation in science classrooms. Education and Urban Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517727053.
- Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2005). Leaving children behind: How” Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Valli, L., Cooper, D., & Frankes, L. (1997). Professional development schools and equity: A critical analysis of rhetoric and research. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 22, pp. 251–304). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar