Skip to main content

Teachers’ motivations for initiating innovations

Journal of Educational Change volume 16, pages 171–195 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

This study explores the reasons why teachers introduce innovations into their teaching. Interviews were conducted with thirty teachers in primary, secondary, and university settings in one Midwestern USA community. All participants said they innovated due to a desire to improve student learning; other frequently mentioned reasons were professional development experiences of their own choosing and a desire to avoid personal boredom. Less frequently stated reasons to innovate included the failure of textbooks and experiences with another teacher or the participants’ own children. Implications for professional development include encouraging teachers to discover innovations applicable to their own classrooms through providing them with time and autonomy to develop alternative approaches to teaching curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. All participant names are pseudonyms.

References

  • airball. (2010, January 5). Re: Risk taking in the classroom Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,65556.0.html

  • Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research methods. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, R., & Townsend, D. (1990). Bringing reform to life: Teachers’ stories and professional development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P. (2009, January 5). Ofsted’s new mission—To get rid of boring teachers: ‘Dull’ teaching blamed for bad behaviour. The Guardian. Retrieved March 3, 2009, from http://current.com/1pu3m4c

  • Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting lives, work, and effectiveness. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Botton, A. (2007). The architecture of happiness: The secret art of furnishing your life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emo, E. (2010). Teachers who initiate curriculum innovations: Motivations and benefits. Ph.D., University of York, York. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1136/

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1–9). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grounauer, M.-M. (1993). Caution and years of experience (J. Neufeld, Trans.). In M. Huberman (Ed.), The lives of teachers (pp. 157–180). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, D., Dickson, M., Power, S., Whitty, G., & Gewirtz, S. (2004). Curriculum innovation within an evaluative state: Issues of risk and regulation. The Curriculum Journal, 15(3), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, H. (2010). Explanatory case study. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 371–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshusius, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness? Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers (J. Neufeld, Trans.). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jersild, A. (1955). When teachers face themselves. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessness, J. (2002, July). Stand and deliver revisited. Retrieved from http://www.reason.com/news/show/28479.html

  • Leonard, G. (1987). Education and ecstasy with “the great school reform hoax” (2nd ed.). Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 223–253)., Conative and affective process analyses Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, W., & Graham, C. (2009). Factors contributing to improved teaching performance. Innovative Higher Education, 34(3), 161–171. doi:10.1007/s10755-009-9103-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (Ed.). (2005). Why we teach. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • No child left behind 2009 report card. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.doe.sd.gov/reportcard/listnew/?p=1

  • Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. doi:10.1007/sl10833-013-9215-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. M. (2002). Discourses about a teacher’s self-initiated change in praxis: Storylines of care and support. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S., & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers’ commitment. Sociology of Education, 63(4), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, E. (1994). Maine attraction: Nancie Atwell. In R. Wolk & B. H. Rodman (Eds.), Classroom crusaders: Twelve teachers who are trying to change the system (pp. 128–146). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2006). Inteviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleegers, P. (1999). Professional identity, school reform, and burnout: Some reflections on teacher burnout. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 247–255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. E., Waugh, R. M., Summers, J. J., & Grove, C. M. (2009). Implementing high-quality educational reform efforts: An interpersonal circumplex model bridging social and personal aspects of teachers’ motivation. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 253–272). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1932/1961). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell and Russell. (Original work published in 1932)

  • Wolk, R., & Rodman, B. H. (Eds.). (1994). Classroom crusaders: Twelve teachers who are trying to change the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Elementary Education, College of Education, University of Minnesota, 600 East 4th St., Morris, MN, 56267, USA

    Wendy Emo

Authors
  1. Wendy Emo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Emo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emo, W. Teachers’ motivations for initiating innovations. J Educ Change 16, 171–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9243-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9243-7

Keywords

  • Boredom
  • Innovation
  • Professional identity
  • Teacher autonomy
  • Teacher motivation