This study explores the reasons why teachers introduce innovations into their teaching. Interviews were conducted with thirty teachers in primary, secondary, and university settings in one Midwestern USA community. All participants said they innovated due to a desire to improve student learning; other frequently mentioned reasons were professional development experiences of their own choosing and a desire to avoid personal boredom. Less frequently stated reasons to innovate included the failure of textbooks and experiences with another teacher or the participants’ own children. Implications for professional development include encouraging teachers to discover innovations applicable to their own classrooms through providing them with time and autonomy to develop alternative approaches to teaching curriculum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
All participant names are pseudonyms.
airball. (2010, January 5). Re: Risk taking in the classroom Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,65556.0.html
Bencze, L., & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: Toward more authentic science and science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 521–539.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research methods. London: Unwin Hyman.
Butt, R., & Townsend, D. (1990). Bringing reform to life: Teachers’ stories and professional development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 255–269.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.
Curtis, P. (2009, January 5). Ofsted’s new mission—To get rid of boring teachers: ‘Dull’ teaching blamed for bad behaviour. The Guardian. Retrieved March 3, 2009, from http://current.com/1pu3m4c
Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57.
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London: Routledge.
Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting lives, work, and effectiveness. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
de Botton, A. (2007). The architecture of happiness: The secret art of furnishing your life. London: Penguin.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Emo, E. (2010). Teachers who initiate curriculum innovations: Motivations and benefits. Ph.D., University of York, York. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1136/
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1–9). London: Falmer Press.
Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 1–27). London: Falmer Press.
Grounauer, M.-M. (1993). Caution and years of experience (J. Neufeld, Trans.). In M. Huberman (Ed.), The lives of teachers (pp. 157–180). New York: Teachers College Press.
Halpin, D., Dickson, M., Power, S., Whitty, G., & Gewirtz, S. (2004). Curriculum innovation within an evaluative state: Issues of risk and regulation. The Curriculum Journal, 15(3), 197–206.
Harder, H. (2010). Explanatory case study. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 371–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heshusius, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness? Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15–21.
Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers (J. Neufeld, Trans.). London: Cassell.
Jersild, A. (1955). When teachers face themselves. New York: Teachers College Press.
Jessness, J. (2002, July). Stand and deliver revisited. Retrieved from http://www.reason.com/news/show/28479.html
Leonard, G. (1987). Education and ecstasy with “the great school reform hoax” (2nd ed.). Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 223–253)., Conative and affective process analyses Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, A., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
McGowan, W., & Graham, C. (2009). Factors contributing to improved teaching performance. Innovative Higher Education, 34(3), 161–171. doi:10.1007/s10755-009-9103-6.
Nieto, S. (Ed.). (2005). Why we teach. New York: Teachers College Press.
No child left behind 2009 report card. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.doe.sd.gov/reportcard/listnew/?p=1
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. doi:10.1007/sl10833-013-9215-8.
Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. M. (2002). Discourses about a teacher’s self-initiated change in praxis: Storylines of care and support. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 1079–1094.
Rosenholtz, S., & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers’ commitment. Sociology of Education, 63(4), 241–257.
Schulz, E. (1994). Maine attraction: Nancie Atwell. In R. Wolk & B. H. Rodman (Eds.), Classroom crusaders: Twelve teachers who are trying to change the system (pp. 128–146). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seidman, I. (2006). Inteviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001.
Sleegers, P. (1999). Professional identity, school reform, and burnout: Some reflections on teacher burnout. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 247–255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. E., Waugh, R. M., Summers, J. J., & Grove, C. M. (2009). Implementing high-quality educational reform efforts: An interpersonal circumplex model bridging social and personal aspects of teachers’ motivation. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 253–272). London: Springer.
Waller, W. (1932/1961). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell and Russell. (Original work published in 1932)
Wolk, R., & Rodman, B. H. (Eds.). (1994). Classroom crusaders: Twelve teachers who are trying to change the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
About this article
Cite this article
Emo, W. Teachers’ motivations for initiating innovations. J Educ Change 16, 171–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9243-7
- Professional identity
- Teacher autonomy
- Teacher motivation