Abstract
While educational theory has often seen collaboration and competition as incompatible, there is increasing evidence that collaboration persists in educational markets characterized by competition. In this paper, we use the theoretical lens of ‘coopetition’, a relationship between organizations involving competition in some segments and cooperation in others, to study this phenomenon and look at the applicability of this concept to education. A case study approach was used to study collaboration and competition in a network of eleven 6th-form colleges, which teach 16–18-year-old students in England. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with managers in each college. Documentary evidence was collected such as websites, brochures, and publicity materials. Results show that the collaborative network was perceived positively. The concept of coopetition was clearly applicable to this network, with collaboration and competition equally informing college strategies and policies, and many aspects of coopetition theory applying to the network. However, challenges to future collaboration were identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainscow, M., Muijs, D., & West, M. (2006). Collaboration as a strategy for improving schools in challenging circumstances. Improving Schools, 9(3), 1–11.
Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ball, S. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: The middle classes and social advantage. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bennett, R. A., & Kottasz, R. (2011). Strategic, competitive and cooperative approaches to internationalisation in European business schools. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11–12), 1087–1116.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Coopetition in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 49 (3), 411–426.
Berkemeyer, N., Bos, W., Manitius, V., & Müthing, H. (2008). Unterrichtsentwicklung in NetzwerkenKonzeptionen, Befunde, Perspektiven. Muster: Waxmann.
Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, J. (1996). Co-opetition: A revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation: The game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. New York: Profile Books.
Bruno, C. (1993). Big red keeps rolling. Novell’s next move. Network World, 10(40), 52–54.
Chakrabarti, R. (2011). Vouchers, responses and the test-taking population. Regression-discontinuity evidence from Florida. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports no 486.
Chapman, C., & Allen, T. (2005). Partnerships for improvement: The specialist schools achievement programme. London: The Specialist Schools Trust.
Chapman, C., Muijs, D. & MacAllister, J. (2012). Collaborative school turnaround: A study of the impact of federation on student outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada, April 2012.
Chapman, C., Muijs, D. & Sammons, P. (2010). Federations and student outcomes: A study of the impact of school-to-school collaboration on school improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Denver, CO, April 2010.
Clark, D. (2005). Politics, markets and schools: Quasi-experimental evidence on the impact of autonomy and competition from a truly revolutionary UK reform. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
CUREE. (2005). Systematic research review: The impact of networks on pupils, practitioners, organisations and the committees they serve. Nottingham: NCSL.
Dagnino, P. & Padula, P. (2002). Coopetition strategy. A new form of interfirm dynamics for value creation. Paper presented at the European Academy of Management Second Annual Conference—“Innovative Research in Management” Stockholm, 9–11 May 2002.
Damore, S. J., Kapustka, K. M., & McDevitt, P. (2011). The urban professional development schools network: Assessing the partnership’s impact on initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 46(3), 182–207.
Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2008). School choice in the light of the effectiveness differences of various types of public and private schools in 19 OECD countries. Journal of School Choice, 2(3), 260–300.
Erixon Arreman, I., & Holm, A.-S. (2011). School as “Edu-business”: Four “serious players” in the Swedish upper secondary school market. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 637–657.
Ghosh, S. (2009). Strategic interaction among public school districts: Evidence on spatial interdependence in school inputs. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 440–450.
Gibbons, S., Machin, S., & Silva, O. (2008). Choice, competition and pupil achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 912–947.
Hadfield, M., Jopling, M., Noden, C., & O’Leary, D. (2005). The existing knowledge base around the impact of networking and collaboration. Nottingham: NCSL Networked Learning Group.
Hargreaves, L. (1996). Collaboration: A condition for survival for small rural schools? In D. Bridges & C. Husbands (Eds.), Consorting and collaborating in the education marketplace (pp. 21–38). London: Falmer Press.
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A General theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.
Kahne, J., O’Brien, J., Brown, A., & Quinn, T. (2001). Leveraging social capital and school improvement: The case of a school network and a comprehensive community initiative in Chicago. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 429–461.
Lacomba, J. A., Lagos, F., & Neugebauer, T. (2011). Who makes the pie bigger? An experimental study on co-opetition. New Zealand Economic Papers, 45(1–2), 59–68.
Lecocq, X., & Yami, S. (2002). From value chain to value networks: Towards a new strategic model. In S. Lundan (Ed.), Network Knowledge in international business. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mention, A.-L. (2010). Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: Which influence on innovation novelty? Technovation, 31(1), 44–53.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Muijs, D., Chapman, C., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2011). Networking and collaboration in education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Muijs, D. & Rumyantseva, N. (2012). Coopetition in education? A case study of collaboration in a competitive environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada, April 2012.
Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking and collaboration between schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 5–27.
Nooteboom, B. (2004). Inter-firm collaboration, networks and strategy : An integrated approach (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denier, D., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3 and 4), 137–168.
Rincke, J. (2005). Competition in the public school sector: Evidence on strategic interaction among US school districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 352–369.
Rosenfeld, S. A. (1996). Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inert-firm collaboration. Research Policy, 25(3), 247–263.
Sandstrom, F. M., & Bergstrom, F. (2005). School vouchers in practise: Competition will not hurt you. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 351–380.
Schwandt, Thomas A., & Halpern, Edward S. (1988). Linking auditing and metaevaluation: Enhancing quality in applied research. London: Sage.
Van der Wende, M. (2007). Internationalisation of higher education in the OECD countries: Challenges and opportunities for the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3/4), 274–289.
Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in a collaborative zone: Conceptualising collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15.
Wiborg, S. (2010) Swedish free schools: Do they work? Published by the centre for learning and life chances in knowledge economies and societies at: http://www.llakes.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muijs, D., Rumyantseva, N. Coopetition in education: Collaborating in a competitive environment. J Educ Change 15, 1–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9223-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9223-8