Skip to main content
Log in

Overlooking the descent: Operational definition, identification, and description of school decline

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educators, researchers, politicians, and the media have committed considerable time, attention, and effort to chronically low-performing schools. Although many have chided the schools for their unacceptable performance or designed strategies to improve them, few have sought to understand how these schools became chronically low-performing in the first place. Better knowledge of how schools decline into chronic low-performance will allow interested stakeholders to potentially prevent and turnaround chronically low-performing schools. However, before understanding the factors and processes associated with or contributing to school decline, researchers must first properly define and identify the process. This paper offers four operational definitions of school decline, applies those definitions to a population of schools, and evaluates the utility of each definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Enticott, G. (2006). Performance failure in the public sector: Misfortune or mismanagement. Public Management Review, 8(2), 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Davy, J., & Carter, C. (1985). Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: Motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(2), 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Kim, M. U., & Whetten, D. A. (1987a). Organizational effects of decline and turbulence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A., & Kim, M. U. (1987b). Organizational dysfunctions of decline. The Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Sutton, R. I., & Whetten, D. A. (Eds.). (1988). Readings in organizational decline. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. P. (2004). Leave no child behind: Preparing today’s youth for tomorrow’s world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on No Child Left Behind. (2007). Beyond NCLB. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1989). The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 577–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. (2008, October 13). Under ‘No Child’ law, even solid schools falter. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  • Duke, D. L. (1995). The school that refused to die. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L. (2007). Keys to sustaining successful school turnaround. Unpublished manuscript, Darden-Curry Partnership for Leaders in Education, Charlottesville, VA.

  • Duke, D. L. (2008). Understanding school decline. International Studies in Educational Administration, 36(2), 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L., & Cohen, J. S. (1983). Do public schools have a future? A case study of retrenchment and its implications. The Urban Review, 15(2), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L., & Hochbein, C. D. (2008). Rising to the challenges of studying school decline. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(4), 358–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangos, S. J., & Bennett, S. J. (1993). Team zebra: How 1500 partners revitalized Eastman Kodak’s black and white film-making flow. Essex Junction, VT: Oliver Wight Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebeloff, R. (2008, September 28). An F school? Depends on how it’s judged. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  • Grant, G. (1988). The world we created at Hamilton High. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M. E. (1989). From organizational decline to organizational renewal: The phoenix syndrome. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. I. (1976). A system pathology of an organization: The rise and fall of the old Saturday Evening Post. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1988). Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., & Redding, S. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (2003). Leadership and the psychology of turnarounds. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2003). Moneyball: The art of winning an unfair game. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P., & Nelson, R. T. (1987). How to recognize—and avoid—organizational decline. Sloan Management Review, 28(3), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, C., Crane, C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2008). What do we know about school effectiveness? Academic gains in public and private schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 689–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1988). Organizational decline from the population perspective. In K. S. Cameron, R. I. Sutton, & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Readings in organizational decline (pp. 399–410). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. D. (1988). Organizational decline from the organizational perspective. In K. S. Cameron, R. I. Sutton, & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Readings in organizational decline (pp. 411–416). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Leadership lessons from the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, J. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 426–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Z., & Sheaffer, Z. (2001). Brain drain in declining organizations: Toward a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Bossert, S. T., & Dwyer, D. C. (1983). Research on effective schools: A cautionary note. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. P. (1999). The new landscape for nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1990). Learning together: A history of coeducation in American public schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, W., & Jonsson, E. (1989). Decline in organizations: A literature integration and extension. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1987). Organizational growth and decline processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimpelberg, R. K., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Sensitivity to context: The past and future of effective schools research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 82–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Hochbein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochbein, C. Overlooking the descent: Operational definition, identification, and description of school decline. J Educ Change 12, 281–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9135-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-010-9135-9

Keywords

Navigation