Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Thinking more deeply about networks in education

  • Jorge Ávila de LimaEmail author


In education, initiatives to restructure and reculture schools through their involvement in intra- and inter-institutional networks have grown in number in recent years. Networks of teachers and schools (often linked to institutions outside education) are becoming a key focus of change efforts promoted by professionals and policymakers. However, in current research, writing and policymaking, the use of the network concept has been generally vague, normative and mostly instrumental. This paper develops a discussion of network concepts and proposes more systematic, less normative ways of addressing and researching network issues in education. It outlines a set of key dimensions of intra- and inter-organizational networks and makes a case for more a comprehensive research approach to these phenomena.


Networks Educational change Teacher collaboration 


  1. Andrews, K., & Rothman, M. (2002). Cultivating innovation: How a charter/district network is turning professional development into professional practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(7), 507–512.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, W. E. (1992). The network organization in theory and practice. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 397–429). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakkenes, I. (1996). Professional isolation of primary school teachers: A task-specific approach. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO.Google Scholar
  4. Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through inter-organizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, M., Jopling, M., Cordingley, P., Firth, A., King, E., & Mitchell, H. (2006). What is the impact on pupils of networks that include at least three schools? What additional benefits are there for practitioners, organizations and the communities they serve? Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Retrieved from
  7. Benson, J. K. (1975). The inter-organizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, F. S., et al. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.Google Scholar
  11. Borys, B., & Jemison, D. B. (1989). Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 191–215). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Busher, H., & Hodgkinson, K. (1995). Managing interschool networks: Across the primary/secondary divide. School Organization, 15(3), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busher, H., & Hodgkinson, K. (1996). Co-operation and tension between autonomous schools: A study of interschool networking. Educational Review, 48(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmichael, P., et al. (2006). Learning how to learn in classrooms, schools and networks: Teachers’ networks in and out of school. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chapman, J., & Aspin, D. (2003). Networks of learning: A new construct for educational provision and a new strategy for reform. In B. Davies & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (pp. 653–659). London: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, G. B., & Carley, K. M. (2008). Clearing the FOG: Fuzzy, overlapping groups for social networks. Social Networks, 30, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, C., & Hadfield, M. (2004). Learning though networks: Trust, partnerships and the power of action research. Educational Action Research, 12(4), 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2005). What makes a network a learning network? National College for School Leadership, UK. Retrieved from
  21. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, L. C. (1992). The sociological concept of “group”: An empirical test of two models. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldsberry, L. (1995). The evolution of a restructuring school: The New Suncook case. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools (pp. 136–156). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Kahne, J., O’Brien, J., Brown, A., & Quinn, T. (2001). Leveraging social capital and school improvement: The case of a school network and a comprehensive community initiative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 429–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 216–239). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.Google Scholar
  30. Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1998). Educational reform networks: Changes in the forms of reform. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), International handbook of educational change, Part One (pp. 710–729). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. Lieberman, A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1992). Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(9), 673–677.Google Scholar
  32. Lieberman, A., & Wood, D. (2003). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lima, J. A. (1997). Colleagues and friends: Teachers’ professional and personal relationships in two Portuguese secondary schools. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of the Azores, Portugal.Google Scholar
  34. Lima, J. A. (1998, April). Improving the study of teacher collegiality: Methodological issues. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Diego.Google Scholar
  35. Lima, J. A. (2001). Forgetting about friendship: Using conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lima, J. A. (2003). Trained for isolation: The impact of departmental cultures on student teachers’ views and practices of collaboration. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(3), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lima, J. A. (2004). Social networks in teaching. In F. Hernandez & I. Goodson (Eds.), The social geographies of educational change (pp. 29–46). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  38. Lima, J. A. (2007). Professional development in departmentalised organisations: Lessons for school improvement from a case study of two curriculum departments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lima, J. A. (2008). Department networks and distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 28(2), 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonald, J. P., & Klein, E. J. (2003). Networking for teacher learning: Toward a theory of effective design. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1606–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1992). Causes of failure in network organizations. California Management Review, 34(4), 53–72.Google Scholar
  42. Nohria, N. (1992). Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 1–22). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 288–308). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pennell, J. R., & Firestone, W. A. (1996). Changing classroom practices through teacher networks: Matching program features with teacher characteristics and circumstances. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 46–76.Google Scholar
  45. Perrow, C. (1992). Small-firm networks. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form, and action (pp. 445–470). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  46. Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rusch, E. A. (2005). Institutional barriers to organizational learning in school systems: The power of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Stoll, L. (2005). Developing professional learning communities: messages for learning networks. National College for School Leadership, International perspectives on networked learning. Retrieved September 4, 2006, from
  50. Veugelers, W., & Zijlstra, H. (1996). Networks for modernizing secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 76–79.Google Scholar
  51. Veugelers, W., & Zijlstra, H. (2002). What goes on in a network? Some Dutch experiences. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(2), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wohlstetter, P., Malloy, C. L., Chau, D., & Polhemus, J. L. (2003). Improving schools through networks: A new approach to urban school reform. Educational Policy, 17, 399–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of the AzoresPonta DelgadaPortugal

Personalised recommendations