External degree constructions in Mandarin

Abstract

This paper analyzes the Mandarin counterpart of a German construction that is initiated with a [degree + determiner] cluster, such as total die Party ‘a total party’. It shows that the Deg-to-D head movement in German is also seen in the Mandarin hao + yi + ge construction. Moreover, it argues that in Mandarin, the head cluster moves further out of the DP, explaining why the construction rejects an overt copula and why it is used as a predicate exclusively. Furthermore, it identifies the null subject of the construction in Mandarin, which is exclamative, as a new type of obligatorily silent subject, parallel to the type of null subject that is found in imperatives and exhortatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Abbreviations in the glosses: CL: classifier; DE: modification; EI: expressive intensifier; EXCL: exclamatory; FM: focus marker; PRF: perfective aspect; Q: question.

  2. 2.

    A nominal like that in (2a) can be built by the raising of the modifier phrase to the left edge of the nominal (Matushansky 2002 for English, Kallulli and Rothmayr 2008 for German, and Zhang 2015b for Mandarin).

  3. 3.

    Our discussion is restricted to the constructions that are initiated with the cluster hao + yi + CL. (i) represents a more complex construction, where da ‘big’ precedes the classifier or unit word. We do not discuss it here.

    (i) Hao yi da guan mifeng gai zenme chuli a?
      ei one big jar honey should how deal.with q
      ‘How should I deal with this big jar of honey?’

    We also leave for future research the hao-ni-ge construction, as seen in (ii). Unlike EDCs, the construction is used to condemn or mock the hearer only: it cannot be used to address any other persons.

    (ii) Hao ni ge pianzi!
      ei you cl cheater
      ‘EI you cheater!’    
  4. 4.

    In G&T, their (67a) and (68a), which are our (11a) and (12a), respectively, are marked with *. But as pointed out by an anonymous reviewer, these examples can be acceptable given the right context. We thus marked them with #.

  5. 5.

    One reviewer asks why, if the adjective in the EDC in (ib) is gradable, can it not occur with hen ‘very’ in (ia).

    (i) a. *hen naohonghong de jiaoshi b. hao yi ge naohonghong de jiaoshi.
       very chaotic.noisy de classroom   ei one cl chaotic.noisy de classroom
            ‘EI a chaotic and noisy classroom’

    A complex adjective such as naohonghong is indeed incompatible with a degree word (Lü 1980; Zhang 2015: 27). One account for the acceptability of (ib) is that the construction can be an N-EDC, instead of M-EDC. In other words, the EI hao is associated with the whole nominal naohonghong de jiaoshi, rather than naohonghong alone. But I leave the issue for future research.

  6. 6.

    The pro subject of an EDC in Mandarin may not be plural, as seen in (i). But this restriction comes from the yi-nominal itself. This restriction is seen in any nominal predicate that has yi, not restricted to EDCs.

    (i) Hao yi ge xingshang {ziji/*tamen-ziji} de ren!
      ei one cl admire self/they-self de person
      ‘What a person that admires himself!’
  7. 7.

    The compound zi-wo ‘self-1st.sg’ is synonymous to ziji ‘self’, and thus it does not have a first person feature. In (63a) and (63b), ziji can be replaced with zi-wo.

    Also, for some unknown reason, if a reflexive is intended to have a second or first person reading, only the bare ziji, but not ni-ziji ‘yourself’ or wo-ziji ‘myself’, is allowed in an EDC (I thank Hsuan-Hsiang Wang for noticing this fact):

    (ii) Hao yi ge xingshang {ziji/*ni-ziji} de ren!
      ei one cl admire self/you-self de person
      Intended: ‘You are an EI person that admires yourself!’
  8. 8.

    One reviewer asks whether, in the case where an EDC is an exclamative, rejection of a copula and the impossibility of functioning as an argument can be explained straightforwardly. Let us consider the contrast between (ia) and (ib):

    (i) a. Mary knows how very cute he is.      (Zanuttini and Portner 2003: 46)
      b. *Mali zhidao hao yi duo moli-hua.
       Mali know ei one cl jasmine-flower

    If know c-selects either a DP or CP, (ia) satisfies the CP selection, since the wh-movement of the how-phrase lands in the C-domain. Assume that zhidao ‘know’ also c-selects either a DP or CP. The unacceptability of (ib) may suggest that the clause level of an EDC in Mandarin is lower than a CP and thus it cannot be selected by zhidao. Thus, an EDC in the language is still different from other kinds of exclamatives.

    The rejection of a copula in an EDC is indeed compatible with the status of an exclamative clause, which never follows a copula. Thus, the restriction can be explained from different perspectives. Nevertheless, the head movement of a degree element is still necessary to derive an EDC, where hao is not in its canonical position (§3).

References

  1. Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand. 2005. Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2): 161–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arche, María J., Antonio Fábregas, and Rafael Marín. 2020. Main questions in the study of copulas: Categories, structures and operations. In Grammar of copulas across languages, ed. María J. Arche, Antonio Fábregas, and Rafael Marín, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Badan, Linda, and Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng. 2015. Exclamatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24(4): 383–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. The imperative in English. In To honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, vol. 1, ed. Roman Jakobson, 335–362. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson, Greg. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1980. Garland Press, New York.

  7. Castroviejo, Miró E. 2006. Wh-exclamatives in Catalan. Doctoral dissertation. University of Barcelona, Barcelona.

  8. Castroviejo, Miró E. 2008. An expressive answer: Some considerations on the semantics and pragmatics of wh-exclamatives. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 44(2): 3–17. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  9. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Constantinescu, Camelia. 2011. Gradability in the nominal domain. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.

  11. Davidson, Donald Herbert. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The logic of decision and action, ed. N. Rescher, 81–120. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elliott, Dale E. 1974. Toward a grammar of exclamations. Foundations of Language 11: 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geist, Ljudmila. 2019. Predication over aspects of human individuals. Linguistics 57(6): 1305–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grano, Thomas. 2012. Mandarin hen and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2): 513–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gutzmann, Daniel, and Katharina Turgay. 2015. Expressive intensifiers and external degree modification. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17(3): 185–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haider, Hubert. 2003. V-clustering and clause union. In Verb constructions in German and Dutch, ed. Pieter A.M. Seuren and Gerard Kempen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hohaus, Vera, and M. Ryan Bochnak. 2020. The grammar of degree: Gradability across languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 6: 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kallulli, Dalina, and Antonia Rothmayr. 2008. The syntax and semantics of indefinite determiner doubling constructions in varieties of German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11(2): 95–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, David. 1999. The meaning of ouch and oops. Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Masss, LA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lasersohn, Peter. 2000. Same, models and representation. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10: 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, Xuping. 2019. Nominal gradability in Mandarin: The Deg-N construction. Talk given at the Conference on Degree Grammar, Nanjing, March 16–17.

  23. Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther. 2010. The positive morpheme in Chinese and the adjectival structure. Lingua 120(4): 1010–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matushansky, Ora. 2002. Movement of degree/degree of movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  26. Meinunger, André. 2009. Leftmost peripheral adverbs and adjectives in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(2): 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  28. Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Event arguments: Foundations and applications, ed. C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein, 69–88. Tübingen: Max Niemyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morzycki, Marcin. 2009. Degree modification of gradable nouns: Size adjectives and adnominal degree morphemes. Natural Language Semantics 17(2): 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morzycki, Marcin. 2012. The several faces of adnominal degree modification. Proceedings of WCCFL 29: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English, vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Portner, Paul, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2005. The semantics of nominal exclamatives. In Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, ed. Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert J. Stainton, 57–67. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Potts, Christopher. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–197.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1973. The comparative. In Generative grammar in Europe, ed. F. Kiefer and N. Ruwet, 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  38. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Object specificity in Chinese: A view from the vP periphery. The Linguistic Review 25(3–4): 479–502.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Williams, Edwin. 1985. PRO and subject of NP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(3): 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xie, Zhiguo, and Qiongpeng Luo. 2019. Degree intensifiers as expressives in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 20(2): 256–281.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, Ching-Yu Helen. 2017. Exclamatives in Mandarin Chinese: the syntax–semantics interface. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.

  42. Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak, and Paul Portner. 2012. A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(4): 1231–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2011. Semantic features of counting units in a syntagmatic perspective. In Language and cognition: Festschrift in honor of James H-Y. Tai on his 70th birthday, ed. Jung-hsing Chang, 363–393. Taipei: Crane Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2015a. Functional head properties of the degree word Hen in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua 153: 14–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2015b. Nominal-internal phrasal movement in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review 32(2): 375–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2019. Complex indefinites and the projection of DP in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28(2): 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Qingwen. 2009. On the syntax of non-verbal predication in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and to James Huang for his continued support. I also thank Hsuan-Hsiang Wang, Wei Cheng Sung, Chiachen Chang, Jianhui Zhang, Chuyao Zhang, and Lixin Jin for their help with the examples. Remaining errors are mine. This research has been partially supported by the grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niina Ning Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, N.N. External degree constructions in Mandarin. J East Asian Linguist 29, 365–392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09216-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Expressive
  • Intensifier
  • Degree
  • Exclamative
  • Copula
  • Pro
  • Mandarin