Revisiting phonotactic repairs in Cantonese loanword phonology: it’s all about sC

Abstract

Different factors have been claimed to affect the choice of repair on English words with ill-formed Cantonese phonotactics in Cantonese loanword phonology. The first half of this paper presents experimental evidence showing that variation is observed only when repairing different onset cluster types: there is vowel epenthesis for s + consonant (sC) clusters but deletion of the second consonant for other (OR) clusters. I propose that the Syllable Mapping Grammar (SMG), the syllable structure mapping component of the perception grammar, drives such variation: Cantonese speakers assign different phonological representations based on cluster well-formedness. When they perceive words with an sC cluster, their SMG assigns [s] as syllabic. A full OT grammar is also provided. I present evidence for the knowledge of cluster well-formedness from speakers of languages like Cantonese where complex onsets are absent. Potential sources of such knowledge and other alternatives to my proposal are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    As pointed out by a reviewer, the generalization here focuses on English words with a simplex fricative coda. For words with a coda cluster in which one member is a fricative, please refer to Kenstowicz (2011).

  2. 2.

    Since there is no voicing contrast in Cantonese, English words ending with the voiced fricatives were also used in this experiment.

  3. 3.

    It is a simplified version of a family of constraints that bans syllabic consonants with different sonority profiles (e.g. *Peak/Stop ≫ *Peak/Fricative ≫ *Peak/Nasal…).

References

  1. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, Robert S., and Paul K. Benedict. 1997. Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berent, Iris, Tracy Lennertz, Jongho Jun, Miguel A. Moreno, and Paul Smolensky. 2008. Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(14): 5321–5325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801469105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boersma, Paul, and Silke Hamann. 2009. Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. In Loan phonology (current issues in linguistic theory), ed. Andrea Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels, 11–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.307.02boe.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broselow, Ellen. 2015. The typology of position-quality interactions in loanword vowel insertion. In Capturing phonological shades: Papers in theoretical phonology, ed. Yuchau E. Hsiao and Lian-Hee Wee, 292–319. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daland, Robert, Bruce Hayes, James White, Marc Garellek, Andrea Davis, and Ingrid Normann. 2011. Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology 28(2): 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675711000145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson, Lisa. 2007. The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology 24(2): 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675707001200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleischhacker, Heidi Anne. 2005. Similarity in phonology: Evidence from reduplication and loan adaptation. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.

  9. Goad, Heather. 2011. The representation of sC clusters. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Karen Rice, 898–923. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamann, Silke, and David W.L. Li. 2016. Adaptation of English onset clusters across time in Hong Kong Cantonese: The role of the perception grammar. Linguistics in Amsterdam 9(3): 56–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond, Michael. 1997. Parsing in OT. Unpublished manuscript, typescript.

  12. Hayes, Bruce. 2011. Interpreting sonority-projection experiments: The role of phonotactic modeling. In Proceedings of the 17th international congress of phonetic sciences, 835–838.

  13. Hermes, Anne, Doris Mücke, and Martine Grice. 2013. Gestural coordination of Italian word-initial clusters: The case of ‘impures’. Phonology 30(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267571300002x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang, Yoonjung. 2011. Loanword phonology. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Karen Rice, 2258–2282. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kenstowicz, Michael. 2011. Cantonese loanwords: Conflicting faithfulness in VC rime constraints. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 11: 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leci, Mark, and Meoni Poon. 2004. Resolving consonant clusters: An OT analysis of English loanwords into Cantonese. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 23, 103–118.

  17. Luke, Kang-kwong, and Chaak-ming Lau. 2008. On loanword truncation in Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(4): 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morelli, Frida. 1999. The phonotactics and phonology of obstruent clusters in optimality theory. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.

  19. Pater, Joe. 2004. Bridging the gap between receptive and productive development with minimally violable constraints. In Constraints in phonological acquisition, ed. René Kager, Joe Pater, and Wim Zonneveld, 219–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.

  21. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Language sound structure, ed. Mark Aronoff and Richard T. Oehrle, 107–136. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9(2): 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yip, Moira. 1993. Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 261–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, Xu, and Iris Berent. 2017. The basis of the syllable hierarchy: Articulatory pressures or universal phonological constraints? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(4): 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9375-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Ellen Broselow, Christina Bethin, Michael Becker, and the anonymous JEAL reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Part of this research was presented in the 4th Workshop on innovations in Cantonese Linguistics, the 27th Annual Conference of International Association of Chinese Linguistics, and Chicago Linguistics Society 55. I thank the audiences for their questions and comments. Thanks are also due to the participants of the experiments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Hong-Lun Yeung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Stimuli for experiment 1

  RP English Epenthetic form Deleted form
blank blæŋk peŋle:ŋ pe:ŋ
bleep blip pi:li:p pi:p
blink blɪŋk pɪŋlɪŋ pɪŋ
block blɒk pɔklɔk pɔk
clap kʰlæp khelep khep
click kʰlɪk kheklek khek
clip kʰlɪp khi:li:p khiːp
clog kʰlɒg khɔklɔk khɔk
flip flɪp fi:li:p fi:p
flirt flɜːt fɜtlɜt fɜt
flood flʌd fʌtlʌt fʌt
flow fləʊ fowlow fow
glare ɡleə ke:le: ke:
gleam gli:m ki:li:m ki:m
glow gləʊ kowlow kow
glue glu: ku:lu: ku:
plan phlæn phe:le:n phe:n
play phlej phejlej phej
plot phlɒt phɔtlɔt phɔt
plug phlʌɡ phʌklʌ:k pʌ:k
slam slæm si:lem sem
slap slæp si:lep sep
sleep slip si:lip sip
slide slajd si:lajt sajt

Appendix 2: Stimuli for experiment 2

  RP English Epenthetic form Faithful form Deleted form
advice ədvaɪs etwajsi etwajs etwaj
base bejs pejsi pejs pej
belief bɪliːf piliːfu piliːf piliː
bonus bəʊnəs pownʌsi pownʌs pownʌ
captive kæptɪv keptifu keptif kepti
cave kejv kejfu kejf kej
course kɔːs kɔːsi kɔːs kɔː
invoice ɪnvɔjs inwɔ:jsi inwɔ:js inwɔ:j
motif məʊˈtiːf mowti:fu mowti:f mowti:
motive məʊtɪv mowtifu mowtif mowti
office ɒfɪs ɔfʌsi ɔfʌs ɔfʌ
olive ɒlɪv ɔli:fu ɔli:f ɔli:
pass pɑːs pɑːsi pɑːs pɑː
police pəliːs powliːsi powliːs powli:
reserve rɪzɜːv wi:sɜːfu wi:sɜːf wi:sɜː
serve sɜːv sɜːfu sɜːf sɜː
service sɜːvɪs sɜːfʌsi sɜːfʌs sɜːfʌ
wife wajf wajfu wajf waj

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeung, A.HL. Revisiting phonotactic repairs in Cantonese loanword phonology: it’s all about sC. J East Asian Linguist 29, 279–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-020-09212-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cantonese
  • Phonology
  • Loanword adaptation
  • Perception
  • Production
  • Onset clusters
  • Phonotactic repairs