Projecting adjectives in Chinese

Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Chinese has the comparative morpheme and the positive morpheme, both of which project in syntax. The covert comparative morpheme is the covert allomorph of the comparative morpheme bǐjiào ‘more’. The covert bǐjiào ‘more’ can only occur in a comparative construction where an overt standard of comparison is syntactically available, but the overt one occurs in a comparative construction where an overt standard of comparison is syntactically unavailable. The positive morpheme also has two allomorphs. One is the unstressed hěn ‘HEN’ and the other is its covert counterpart. The covert one can only occur in a focus sensitive domain where the bare gradable adjective is focus-anchored, but the overt one occurs elsewhere. The covert allomorph, regardless of whether it is the comparative or the positive morpheme, is used to avoid violating the Constraint on Multiple Foci. Accordingly, the proposal of the comparative morpheme and the proposal of the positive morpheme can reinforce each other by establishing a theoretical relationship through the Nonhead Stress rule and the Constraint on Multiple Foci.

Keywords

Comparative morpheme Constraint on multiple foci Covert Nonhead stress rule Overt Positive morpheme 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 2003. Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, Chris. 2002. The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, David I., and Brady Z. Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14(1): 1–56.Google Scholar
  5. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives, ed. Bierwisch Manfred and Ewald Lang, 71–261. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, Gregory, and Francis Pelletier. 1995. The generic book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chao, Yen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cresswell, Max John. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara Partee, 261–292. New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duanmu, San. 2000. The phonology of standard Chinese. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duanmu, San. 2004. Left-headed feet and phrasal stress in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique—Asie Orientale 33(1): 65–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feng, Sheng-Li. 1997. Hànyǔ de yùnlyù, cífă yǔ jùfă [Interactions between morphology, syntax and prosody in Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Feng, Sheng-Li. 2014. Light-verb syntax between English and classical Chinese. In Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, ed. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai, 229–250. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graff, Delia. 2000. Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 28(1): 45–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grano, Thomas. 2012. Mandarin hěn and universal markedness in gradable adjectives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2): 413–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grano, Thomas, and Christopher Kennedy. 2012. Mandarin transitive comparatives and the grammar of measurement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(3): 219–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu, Yang. 2008. Shítài, shízhì lĭlùn yǔ hànyǔ shíjiān cānzhào [Studies of tense, aspect and Chinese time reference]. In Dāngdài yǔyánxúe lĭlùn hé hànyǔ yánjiù [Contemporary linguistic theories and related studies of Chinese], ed. Yang Shen and Shengli Feng, 97–117. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  19. Hale, Austin. 1970. Conditions on English comparative clause pairings. In Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, 30–55. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related issues. Ms., Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  21. Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9(3): 183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellan, Lars. 1981. Towards an integrated analysis of comparatives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  23. Hendriks, Petra. 2004. Optimization in focus identification. In Optimality theory and pragmatics, ed. Reihnard Blutner and Henk Zeevat, 42–62. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 2009. Lexical decomposition, silent categories, and the localizer phrase. Yǔyánxúe lùncóng [Collected Essays on Linguistics] 39: 86–122.Google Scholar
  26. Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 2014. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, ed. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai, 1–48. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Huang, Cheng-Teh James, Yen-Hui Audrey Li, and Ya-Fei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang, Shi-Zhe. 2006. Property theory, adjectives and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(4): 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang, Shi-Zhe. 2016. Adjectives. In Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, ed. Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T.James Huang, and James Myers. Herndon, VA: Brill.Google Scholar
  30. Huang, Shi-Zhe, and Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 2008. A new issue in the semantic analysis of modification structure in Chinese. Paper presented in the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics, May 30th to June 1st 2008, Peking University.Google Scholar
  31. Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition and focus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, Christopher. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1): 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Modes of comparison. In Chicago linguistic society, vol. 43(1), ed. Malcolm Elliot, James Kirby, Osamu Sawada, Eleni Staraki, and Suwon Yoon, 141–165. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  35. Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kiss, Katalin È. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2): 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  39. Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2): 97–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Li, Mei-Du. 1988. Anaphoric structures of Chinese. Taipei: Student Book Company.Google Scholar
  42. Lin, Jo-Wang. 2009. Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters. Natural Language Semantics 17(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin, Jo-Wang. 2014. The adjective of quantity duō ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(2): 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007. The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther. 2010a. The positive morpheme in Chinese and the adjectival structure. Lingua 120(4): 1010–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther. 2010b. The Chinese gèng clausal comparative. Lingua 120(6): 1579–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther. 2012. Two notes on Chinese bi comparatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 38(1): 69–91.Google Scholar
  48. Liu, Yue-Hua, Wen-Yu. Pan, and Gu Wei. 2004. Shíyòng xiàndài hànyǔ yúfă [Modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  49. Lu, Bing-Fu. 1989. Jiégòu, jiézòu, sōng-jĭn zài hànyǔ zhōng de xiānghù zuòyòng [The interaction among structure, rhythm, juncture, stress in Chinese]. Hànyǔ xúexí 3: 25–29.Google Scholar
  50. Lu, Bing-Fu, and San Duanmu. 1991. A case study of the relation between rhythm and syntax in Chinese. Paper presented in the Third North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, May 3rd to 5th 1991, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  51. Lu, Bing-Fu, and San Duanmu. 2002. Rhythm and syntax in Chinese: A case study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 37(2): 123–136.Google Scholar
  52. Lü, Shu-Xiang. 1963. Xiàndài hànyǔ dān-shuāng yīnjié wèntí chūtàn [A preliminary research on mono-disyllabic combinations in modern Chinese]. Zhōngguō Yǔwén 1: 11–23.Google Scholar
  53. Partee, Barbara H. 1991. Topic, focus and quantification. In Proceedings of SALT 1, ed. Steven K. Moore and Adam Zachary Wyner, 159–187. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  54. Paul, Waltraud. 1999. Verb gapping in Chinese: A case of verb raising. Lingua 107(3/4): 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paul, Waltraud. 2012. Why Chinese de is not like French de: A critical analysis of the predicational approach to nominal modification. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(3): 183–210.Google Scholar
  56. Rett, Jessica. 2014. The semantics of evaluativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 271–297. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Schwarzschild, Roger. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2): 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1973. The comparative. In Generative grammar in Europe, ed. Ferenc Kiefer and Nicolas Ruwet, 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shannon, Claude E., and Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shen, Xiao-Nan. 1989. Interplay of the four citation tones and intonation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(1): 61–74.Google Scholar
  63. Shih, Chi-Lin. 1988. Tone and intonation in Mandarin. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 3: 83–109.Google Scholar
  64. Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin vP. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. The (non-)existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(2): 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang, Ting-Chi. 1988. Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  68. von Final, Kai. 1999. NPI licensing, Strawson entailment. Journal of Semantics 16(2): 97–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1): 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xiàndài hànyǔ xūcí lìshì [Examples and explanation of the functional words of modern Chinese]. 1982. eds. Class 1955 and 1957 of Department of Chinese Language and Literature of Peking University, Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  71. Wei, Ting-Chi. 2016. Ellipsis and gapping. In Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, ed. Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T.James Huang, and James Myers. Herndon, VA: Brill.Google Scholar
  72. Zhang, Niina Ning. 2015. Functional head properties of the degree word hěn in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua 153(1): 14–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhu, De-Xi. 1980. Xiàndài hànyǔ yúfă yánjiù [Studies on syntax of modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  74. Zhu, De-Xi. 1982. Yúfă jiăngyì [Lectures on Chinese syntax]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations