Skip to main content

Toward a unified theory of wh-in-situ and islands

Abstract

In a number of wh-in-situ languages, only causal wh-adverbs corresponding to ‘why’ exhibit island effects. The widely adopted explanation for this by Tsai (On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies, 1994a, Nat Lang Linguist Theory 12(1):121–175, 1994b, in: Del Gobbo, Hoshi (eds) UCI working papers in linguistics, University of California, Irvine, 1999, J East Asian Linguist 17(2):83–115, 2008) is to draw a distinction between wh-nominals and wh-adverbs, where the former are unselectively bound by an operator in their scope position, while the latter must raise at LF, thereby inducing island violations. The result is a hybrid approach where wide scope of wh-words is derived by two distinct mechanisms. In this paper, I show that the island-sensitivity of wh-adverbs can be captured in a unified approach based on the observation that island sensitivity correlates with the adjunction height of the adverb. The resulting approach allows us to treat all in situ wh-phrases alike and leads to a unified theory of wh-in-situ which does not rely on LF movement. Furthermore, it will be shown how the analysis extends to other to donkey anaphora, wh-islands and A-not-A questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abe, Jun, and Norbert Hornstein. 2012. “Lasnik-effects” and string-vacuous ATB movement. In Ways of structure building, ed. Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, and Vidal Valmala, 169–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, Ruixi Ressy. 2014. Topic-comment structure, focus movement and gapping formation. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (1): 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, and Y.H. Audrey Li. 1993. Wh-elements in situ: Syntax of LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24 (2): 199–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge, MA

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and “covert” movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Aspects of the syntax of agreement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko, and Jairo Nunes. 2007. The copy theory of movement: A view from PF. In The copy theory of movement, ed. N. Corver, and J. Nunes, 13–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruening, Benjamin. 2007. Wh-in-situ does not correlate with Wh-indefinites or question particles. Linguistic Inquiry 38 (1): 139–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruening, Benjamin, and Thuan Tran. 2006a. Wh-conditionals in Vietnamese and Chinese: Against unselective binding. In Proceedings of BLS 32, ed. Z. Antić, and M.J. Houser, 49–60. Berkeley: Berkley Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruening, Benjamin, and Thuan Tran. 2006b. Wh-questions in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruening, Benjamin, and Thuan Tran. 2013. Wh-phrases as indefinites: A Vietnamese perspective. In Linguistics of Vietnamese: An international survey, ed. D. Hole, and E. Löbel, 217–241. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, Seth. 2010. The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, Juan Carlos, John E. Drury, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2009. Merge over move and the extended projection principle: MOM and the EPP revisited. Iberia 1 (1): 53–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castroviejo, Elena, and Berit Gehrke. 2014. Modification at the interfaces: An introduction. Lingua 149: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics. In Subject and Topic, ed. C.N. Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa L.S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge, MA

  • Cheng, Lisa L.S. 2009. Wh-in-situ, from the 1980s to now. Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (3): 767–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa L.S., and Huang, C.T. James. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 4 (2): 121–163.

  • Cheung, Candice C.H. 2007. Move or not move? A case study of wh-conditionals in Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 37th meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 37), ed. E. Elfner, and M. Walkow, 153–164. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang. 2014. Wh-fronting and the left periphery in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23 (4): 393–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from the Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. K. Hale, and S.J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory accuracy. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. A. Belletti, 104–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M.-L. Zubizarreta, 133–165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, and Gabriella Hermon. 1998. The typology of wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay. Syntax 1: 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris. 2001. Economy conditions in syntax. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. M. Baltin, and C. Collins, 45–61. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The logic of decision and action, ed. N. Resher, 81–95. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from ‘selection’. Syntax 12 (4): 285–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet. 1980. The syntax and semantics of questions in Swedish. Ph.D. diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Ernst, Thomas. 1994. Conditions on Chinese A-not-A questions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3 (3): 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert, C.T.James Huang, Howard Lasnik, and Tanya Reinhart. 1989. The syntax of wh-in-situ. In Proceedings of WCCFL 7, ed. H. Borer, 81–98. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny. 1999. Reconstruction, binding theory and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 157–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (1): 63–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, John, and Sam Gutmann. 1999. Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax. Syntax 2 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Steven, and Željko Bošković. 2001. An argument for multiple spell-out. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (1): 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, Tomohiro, and Kensuke Takita. 2007. Wh-adverbials in-situ, their island-(in)sensitivity and the role of demonstratives in wh-in-situ licensing. Nanzan Linguistic 3 (1): 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, Tomohiro, Kensuke Takita, Barry C.Y. Yang, and W.T.Dylan Tsai. 2014. Comparative remarks on wh-adverbials in situ in Japanese and Chinese. In Japanese syntax in comparative perspective, ed. M. Saito, 181–205. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groat, Erich, and John O’Neil. 1996. Spell-out at the LF interface. In Minimal ideas, ed. W. Abraham, S.D. Epstein, H. Thránsson, and C.J.W. Zwart, 113–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. diss, University of Amsterdam.

  • Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Hagstrom, Paul. 2006. A-not-A questions. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 1, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 173–213. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Charles L. 1958. Questions. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36: 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert, and Paul Pietroski. 2009. Basic operations: Minimal syntax-semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Pei-Ling. 2010. Wh-in-situ, phase, and argument-adjunct asymmetry. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18), vol. 2, ed. L.E. Clemens, and C.M.L. Liu, 209–219. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.T.James. 1982a. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. diss, MIT

  • Huang, C.T.James. 1982b. Move WH in a language without wh-movement. The Linguistic Review 1 (4): 369–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.T.James. 1991. Modularity and Chinese A-not-A questions. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language, ed. C. Georgopoulos, and R. Ishihara, 305–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.T., Y.H. James, Audrey Li, and Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keine, Stefan. 2016. Probes and their horizons. Ph.D. diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Ko, Heejong. 2005. Syntax of wh-in-situ: Merge into in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Lingustic Theory 23: 867–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. J. Rooryck, and L. Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope of pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. S. Rothstein, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard K. 1998. Events and modification in nominals. In Proceedings of SALT 8, ed. D. Strolovitch, and A. Lawson, 145–168. New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (2): 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move \(\alpha \): Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15 (2): 97–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal semantics, ed. E. Keenan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.H.Audrey. 1992. Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 125–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, Jeffrey, and William Idsardi. 1998. Chains and phono-logical form. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 109–125.

  • Lin, Jo-Wang. 1992. The syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 293–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Jo-Wang. 2004. Choice functions and scope of existential polarity wh-phrase in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (4): 451–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maienborn, Claudia. 2001. On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9 (2): 191–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, Lisa. 1999. On the interpretation of wide-scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7: 79–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert C. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge, MA

  • May, Robert C. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, Louise, and Boleda Gemma. 2004. Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 5, ed. O. Bonami, and P. Cabredo Hofherr, 179–196. CSSP: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morzycki, Marcin. 2015 Modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ning, Cunyan. 1993. The overt syntax of topicalization and relativization in Chinese. Ph.D. diss, University of California Irvine.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1986. Quantification in syntax. Ph.D. diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Victor Junnan. 2014. Wh-ex-situ in Mandarin Chinese: Mapping between information structure and split CP. Linguistics Analysis 39: 371–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Waltraud, and John Whitman. 2017 Topic prominence, 2nd edn. In The companion to syntax, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Representation of (in)definiteness, ed. E. Reuland, and A. Ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2013. Diagnosing covert A-movement. In Diagnosing syntax, ed. L.L.-S. Cheng, and N. Corver, 210–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Potsdam, Eric, and Maria Polinsky. 2012. Backward raising. Syntax 15 (1): 75–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1998. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program. Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 1999. Featural cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiers. In Working minimalism, ed. S.D. Epstein, and N. Hornstein, 127–158. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. diss, MIT.

  • Rubin, Edward J. 1994. Modification: A syntactic analysis and its consequences. Ph.D. diss, Cornell University

  • Rubin, Edward J. 1996. The transparent syntax and semantics of modifiers. In Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), ed. B. Agbayani, and S.W. Tang, 429–440. Standford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Edward J. 2003. Determining pair-merge. Linguistic Inquiry 34 (4): 660–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruys, Eddy G. 2000. Weak crossover as a scope phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (3): 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The meaning of chains. Ph.D. diss, MIT.

  • Sauerland, Uli. 2004. The interpretation of traces. Natural Language Semantics 12: 63–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. Givenness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scontras, Gregory, and Andreea C. Nicolae. 2014. Saturating syntax: Linkers and modification in Tagalog. Lingua 149: 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Jee-Youn. 2005. Wh-constructions in Korean: A lexical account. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shou-hsin, Teng. 1975. Predicate movements in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3 (1): 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimík, Radek. 2011. Introduction to the semantics of questions. Unpublished ms., University of Potsdam.

  • Simpson, Andrew. 2000. Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, Hooi Ling. 2005. Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (1): 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanov, Arthur, and W.T.Dylan Tsai. 2008. Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 589–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, James H.Y. 1973. A derivational constraint on adverbial placement in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1 (3): 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. Y. Edwin. 2009. Wh-dependency in Vietnamese and the syntax of wh-in-situ. Master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University.

  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan. 1994a. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Ph.D. diss, MIT, Cambridge, MA

  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan. 1994b. On nominal islands and LF extraction in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12 (1): 121–175.

  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan. 1999. The hows of Why and the whys of How. In UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 5, ed. F. Del Gobbo, and H. Hoshi, 155–184. Irvine, CA: University of California.

  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17 (2): 83–115.

  • Tsai, W. T. Dylan, and Melody Y. Chang. 2003. Two types of wh-adverbials: A typological study of how and why in Tsou. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3 (1): 213–236.

  • van Urk, Coppe. 2015. A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: A case study of Dinka Bor. Ph.D. diss, MIT

  • von Prince, Kilu. 2012. Predication and information structure in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21 (4): 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim. 2000. Some remarks on choice functions and LF-movement. In Reference and anaphoric relations, ed. K. von Heusinger, and U. Egli, 193–228. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira. 2003. Wh and operator constructions in Japanese. Lingua 113: 519–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Yoad. 1997. Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Jianxin. 1999. Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. diss, University of Maryland.

  • Wurmbrand, Susi, and Jonathan D. Bobaljik. 2005. Adjacency, PF and extraposition. In Organizing grammar: Studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, ed. H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huybregts, U. Kleinhenz, and J. Koster, 679–688. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Barry C.Y. 2007. On wh-nominal/adverb interaction and the left periphery. Nanzan Linguistics: Special Issue 1 (1): 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Barry C.Y. 2012. Intervention effects and wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21 (1): 43–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Barry C.Y. 2014. Chinese null subjects: A view from the top. In Peaches and plums: Essays on language and linguistics in honor of Rudolph C. Troike, ed. C.T.J. Huang, and F.H. Liu, 227–253. Tapei: Academia Sinica.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, A. Toward a unified theory of wh-in-situ and islands. J East Asian Linguist 26, 189–231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9155-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9155-z

Keywords

  • Wh-in-situ
  • Islands
  • Argument/adjunct asymmetries
  • Scope
  • Modification