Skip to main content
Log in

On modification with whole/zheng in English and Chinese and the uniformity of syntax

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a comparative study of English whole and Chinese zheng, I argue that in English, when the part-related reading is obtained, whole actually modifies a silent functional projection, which can be identified with the classifier projection in Chinese. Such an analysis provides a clue to the puzzling behavior of English whole, which does not modify plural nouns under the part-related reading (e.g. *The whole apples are large). Theoretically, I argue for a unified analysis of whole/zheng that combines the semantic analysis in Moltmann (Parts and wholes in semantics, 1997; Synthese 116:75–111, 1998; Linguist Philos 28:599–641, 2005, which suggests that the part-related reading of whole is related to situated mass interpretation, and the syntactic proposals in Kayne (Movement and silence, 2005; Lingua 117:832–858, 2007; in: R. Freidin (ed.) Foundational issues in linguistic theory: essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 2008) and Borer (In name only. Structuring sense, 2005a), which argue for the uniform classifier projection at syntax in both classifier and non-classifier languages. The analysis not only sheds light on the cross-linguistic syntax of nominal expressions, but it also provides empirical support for the Uniformity Principle in Universal Grammar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. What Principles & Parameters got wrong. ms. ICREA/UAB.

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2011. Approaching parameters from below. In The biolinguistic enterprise, ed. Anna-Maria Di Sciullo, and Cedric Boeckx, 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax, case studies in semitic and romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. Endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, eds. John Moore and Maria Polinsky, 31–67. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Borer, Hagit. 2005a. In name only. Structuring sense, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Borer, Hagit. 2005b. The normal course of events. Structuring sense, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cheng, Lisa L.S. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa L.S. 2009. On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, ed. Monika Rathert, and Anastasia Giannakidou, 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Rint Sybesma. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque, and Richard Kayne, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Xiang-lin. 1992. Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax. PhD diss., Ohio State University.

  • Dekany, Eva Katalin. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP. PhD diss., University of Tromsø.

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, eds. Kenneth Hale and S. Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Huang, C.-T.James. 1982a. Move wh in a language without wh-movement. Linguistic Review 1: 369–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James. 1982b. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD diss., MIT.

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 2007. Several, few, and many. Lingua 117: 832–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 2008. Some preliminary comparative remarks on French and Italian definite articles. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. Robert Freidin, et al., 291–321. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1996. A number projection. ms. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. PhD diss., University of Southern California.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2014. On merge-markers and nominal structures. In Primitive elements of grammatical theory: Papers by Jean-Roger Vergnaud and his collaborators, eds. Katy McKinney-Bock and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 237–273. New York: Routledge.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger, and Yuyun Iris Wang. 2011. Multiple-classifier constructions and nominal expressions in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20: 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Jo-wang. 1998. Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6: 201–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, ed. R. Bauerle, et al., 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 69–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike. 1997. Parts and wholes in semantics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike. 1998. Part structures, integrity, and the mass-count distinction. Synthese 116: 75–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike. 2005. Part structures in situations: The semantics of individual and whole. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 599–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, Jerome Lee. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk C. 1998. Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, Henk C. van. 2005. Silent nouns and the spurious indefinite article in Dutch. In Grammar and beyond: Essays in honour of Lars Hellan, eds. Mila Vulchanova and Afarli Tor A., 163–178. Oslo: Novus Press.

  • Riemsdijk, Henk C. 2008. Identity avoidance: OCP effects in Swiss relatives. In Foundational issus in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, ed. Robert Freidin, et al., 227–250. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from modern hebrew. In Syntax and semantics 25: Perspetives on phrase structure, ed. Susan Rothstein, 37–62. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2011. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns, and the count/mass distinction. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. S. Lima, et al., 661–678. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Dingxu. 2011. Mingci han mingcixing chengfen [Noun and nominals]. Beijing: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann. 2004. Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asian languages. In The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque, and Richard Kayne, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sio, Joanna. 2006. Modification and reference in the Chinese nominal. PhD diss., Leiden University.

  • Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics 28: 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.-C. Jane. 2005. Nouns or classifiers: A non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6: 431–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 1999. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2002. Yi, er, san [One, two, three]. Yuyanxue Luncong [Journal of Linguistics] 26: 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira. 2006. Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 24: 241–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Niina. 2007. Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica 61: 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-wen Roger Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, Ww.R. On modification with whole/zheng in English and Chinese and the uniformity of syntax. J East Asian Linguist 24, 53–74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-014-9122-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-014-9122-x

Keywords

Navigation