Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of numeral classifiers and taxonomic categories on Chinese and English speakers’ recall of nouns

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested that classifiers in Chinese serve a semantic function of categorizing the nouns in terms of their perceptual and functional features. In this study, we investigated the classifiers’ organizational utility in a recall task by contrasting it with that of taxonomic categories. Chinese and English participants studied and immediately recalled two lists of nouns, one associated with four taxonomic categories and the other with four classifiers. The nouns were presented randomly in bare forms or in columns labeled by category names or classifiers. Substantial subjective clustering effects were found in the recall of taxonomically categorized nouns whether they were presented randomly or in labeled columns. The recall of classifier categorized nouns showed no clustering when presented randomly, but some clustering when presented in labeled columns. The findings indicate that (1) classifiers do not serve as a spontaneous memory organizational device among Chinese speakers, (2) when used as such under specific circumstances (e.g., explicitly cued), they are not as effective as taxonomic categories, and (3) Chinese speakers benefit more from explicit labels of classifiers than English, which hints at an indirect language effect. These findings suggest that classifiers are analogous to the so-called ad hoc categories, the constancy of which relies on the degree features shared among the member nouns, as well as the frequency with which speakers are exposed to these nouns as a group, which includes the linguistic experience of using the same classifier to refer to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, Kathleen. 1994. Classifier production in normals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 22: 202–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Nominal classification: Towards a comprehensive typology. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57: 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53: 285–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, W.A. 1953. The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology 49: 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, John D. 1979. Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Yuenren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, William. 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45: 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Jonathan L., and Elizabeth F. Loftus. 1971. The retrieval of words from long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frender, Robert, and Peter Doubilet. 1974. More on measures of category clustering in free recall—Although probably not the last word. Psychological Bulletin 81: 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Ming Y., and Barbara C. Malt. 2009. Mental representation and cognitive consequences of Chinese individual classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 1124–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Mei-ying. 2011. The MDS and cognitive research of measure words of shape. Master thesis, National Pingtung University of Education, Pingtung, Taiwan.

  • Kuo, Jenny Yi-chun, and Maria D. Sera. 2009. Classifier effects on human categorization: The role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 1–19.

  • Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meaning. In New ways of analyzing variation of English, ed. Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy, 340–373. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Emilie L., and Gregory L. Murphy. 2001. Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130: 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel R., Stephan Lewandowsky, and Evan Heit. 2006. Ad hoc category restructuring. Memory and Cognition 34: 1398–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, James. 2000. Rules vs. analogy in Mandarin classifier selection. Language and Linguistics 1: 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard E. 2003. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: The Free Press.

  • Pellegrino, J.W., and L.J. Hubert. 1982. The analysis of organization and structure in free recall. In Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition, ed. C. R. Puff, 129–172. New York: Academic Press.

  • Saalbach, Henrik, and Mutsumi Imai. 2007. Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136: 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B., and S. Zhang. 1998. Language structure and categorization: A study of classifiers in consumer cognition, judgment and choice. Journal of Consumer Research 25: 108–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M. 2010. Do classifiers affect cognitive processing? A study of nominal classification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognition 2: 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, James H-Y. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In In honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, ed. Matthew Chen and Ovid Tseng, 479–494. Taipei: Pyramid.

  • Taylor, John. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, Yi-Min, Ovid J.L. Tzeng, and Daisy L. Hung. 2002. Semantic and cognitive basis of Chinese classifiers: A functional approach. Language and Linguistics 3: 101–132.

  • Tulving, E. 1962. Subjective organization in free recall of “unrelated words”. Psychological Review 69: 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jorg Schmid. 1996. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaeke, John, and Christopher D. Green. 1997. Women, fire, and dangerous theories: A critique of Lakoff’s theory of categorization. Metaphor and Symbol 12: 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Shi, and Bernd Schmitt. 1998. Language-dependent classification: The role of classifiers in cognition, memory and ad evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4: 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuping Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, S., Chen, JY. The effects of numeral classifiers and taxonomic categories on Chinese and English speakers’ recall of nouns. J East Asian Linguist 23, 27–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9108-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-013-9108-0

Keywords

Navigation