Abstract
This paper argues that Old Japanese (eighth century) had split alignment, with nominative-accusative alignment in main clauses and active alignment in nominalized clauses. The main arguments for active alignment in nominalized clause come from ga-marking of active subjects and the distribution of two verbal prefixes: i-for active predicates and sa- for inactive predicates (cf. Yanagida, In: Hasegawa (ed.) Nihongo no shubun genshô [Main clause phenomena in Japanese], 2007b). We review the treatment of non-accusative alignment and argue that active alignment should be analyzed as as a distinct type. We propose a formal analysis of active alignment in nominalized clauses in Old Japanese. The external argument is assigned inherent case, spelled out as ga, in situ in Spec, v. Object arguments are licensed by several distinct mechanisms, including incorporation (Yanagida, In: Miyamoto (ed.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 2007a) and case assignment by a functional head above vP. The latter accounts for the distinctive O wo S ga V word order of OJ nominalized clauses noted by Yanagida (J. of East Asian Linguistics, 2006). Inability to assign object case is a property of [nominal] v, as proposed by Miyagawa (Structure and case marking in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 22, 1989). We discuss the diachronic origins of the OJ active alignment system and point out that it exemplifies a cross-linguistically attested pattern of non-accusative alignment in clauses that originate from nominalizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, Edith. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Alexiadou Artemis. (2001) Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2008. Structuring participles. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, ed. Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 33–41. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Allen, Nicholas J. 1975. Sketch of Thulung grammar. Cornell University East Asia Papers, vol. 6. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Baker Mark C. (1988) Incorporation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bittner Maria, Ken Hale (1996) The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68
Bricker Victoria. (1981) The source of the ergative split in Yukatek Maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 83–127
Borer, Hagit, and Ken Wexler. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Parameter setting, ed. Thomas Roeper and Edwin Williams, 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Chomksy, Noam. 2001. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, 89– 156. Cambridge: MIT.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic typology, ed. Winfred Lehmann, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1983. Agent-patient languages and split case marking systems. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, BLS 9, ed. Amy Dahlstrom and claudia Brugman, 37–46. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Diesing Molly. (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MIT
Dixon R.M.W. (1979) Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138
Dixon R.M.W. (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35.3: 355–392.
Franchetto, Bruna. 1990. Ergativity and nominativity in kuikuro and other Carib languages. In Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, ed. Doris L. Payne, 407–427. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Frellesvig Bjarke, John Whitman (2008) Proto-Japanese. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Gildea Spike. (1998) On reconstructing grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gildea, Spike. 2000. On the genesis of the verb phrase in Cariban languages. In Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, ed. Spike Gildea, 65–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harada Shin-Ichi. (1971) Ga-no conversion and ideolectal variations in Japanese. Gengo kenkyû 60: 25–38
Hendriks Peter. (1998) Kakari particles and the merger of the predicative and attributive forms in the Japanese verbal system. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7: 197–210
Hoji, Hajime. 1991. Raising-to-object, ECM, and the major object in Japanese. Paper presented at the Japanese Syntax Workshop. University of Rochester.
Johns Alana. (1992) Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1): 57–87
Kaufman, Daniel. 2007. The nominalist hypothesis in Austronesian. Paper given at ZAS Berlin, August 14, 2007.
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2001. Joshi kara mita nihongo bunpou no rekisi [A history of Japanese grammar from the view point of particles] Lecture handout. Tokyo university.
Klimov Georgij A. (1974) On the character of languages of active typology. Linguistics 131: 11–25
Klimov Georgij A. (1977) Tipologija jazykov aktivnogo stroja [Typology of languages of the active type]. Nauka, Moscow
Konoshima Tadatoshi (1962) Chûkogo ni okeru yôgen rentaikei no yôhô [The use of the participial adjective in medieval Japanese]. Kokugogaku 48: 102–107
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2003. Subject case in Turkish nominalized clauses. In Syntactic structures and morphological information, ed. Uwe Junghanns and Luka Szusich, 130–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kuginuki Tôru (1996) Kodai Nihongo no keitai henka [Morphological change in earlier Japanese]. Osaka, Izumi Shoin
Kuroda Sige-Yuki (1988) Whether we agree or not: a comparative grammar of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12: 2–44
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 2007. On the syntax of Old Japanese. In Current issues in the history and structure of Japanese, ed. Bjarke Frellesvig, J.C. Smith, and Masayoshi Shibatani, 263–318. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Lahaussois, Aimee. 2003. Ergativity in Thulung Rai: A shift in the position of pronominal split. Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff. Pacific Linguistics, ed. D. Bardley et al. 101–112. Canberra: Australian National university.
Legate Julie (2008) Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 55–101
Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1990. The A/A’ distinction and movement theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Manning Christopher D. (1996) Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. CSLI Publications, Stanford
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4.2, ed. Alexis Dimitriadis et al., 201–225. Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Club.
Meira, Sergio. 2006. Stative verbs vs. nouns in Sateré-Mawé and the Tupian family. In What’s in a verb: Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, Lot Occasional Series, ed. Graz’yna J. Rowicka and Eithne B. Carlin, pp. 189–214. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, Netherlands.
Mithun Marianne. (1991) Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67(3): 510–546
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 22. New York: Academic Press.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1993. Case checking and the Minimal Link Condition. In Case and agreement II, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 19, ed. Colin Phillips, 213–254. Cambridge: MIT.
Miyagawa Shigeru, Fusae Ekida (2003) Historical development of the accusative case marking in Japanese as seen in classical literary texts. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 19: 1–95
Miyamoto, Edson T., Kenneth Wexler, Takako Aikawa, and Shigeru Miyagawa. 1999. Case-dropping and unaccusatives in Japanese acquisition. In BUCLD 23, ed. Annabel greenhill et al., 443–452. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Motohashi, Tatsushi. 1989. Case theory and the history of the Japanese language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
Ohno Susumu. (1953) Nihongo no dôshi no katsuyôkei no kigen ni tuite [On the origin of the Japanese verb conjugations]. Kokugo to kokubungaku 350: 47–56
Omodaka, Histaka et al. 1967. Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten, jôdai-hen [A dictionary of Japanese by period, Old Japanese edition]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Sakakura Atsuyoshi. (1966) Gokô sei no kenkyǔ [Research on Word Formation]. Kadokawa shoten, Tokyo
Sasaki Takashi. (1996) Jôdaigo no kôbun to hyôki [The sentence structure and orthography of Old Japanese]. Hituzi Shobô, Tokyo
Sapir Edward. (1911) The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–282
Sapir, Edward. 1917. Review of C.C Uhlenbeck: Het Passieve Karakter... In The collected works of Edward Sapir V (1990), ed. W. Bright, 69–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. R.M.W. Dixon, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Spencer, Andrew. 1999. Chukchee homepage. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~spena/Chukchee/CHUKCHEE_HOMEPAGE.html
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley, and Lawrence Reid. 1982. The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the travelers, Pacific Linguistics C-75, ed. S.A. Wurm and L. Carrington. 145–170.
Takezawa, Koichi. 1987. A configurational approach to case-marking in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of Washington
Tokieda Motoki. (1954) Nihon bunpô kôgo-hen [Japanese grammar, colloquial language edition]. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo
Van Valin Robert D. (1990) Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2): 221–260
Vovin Alexander. (1997) On the syntactic typology of Old Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 273–290
Vovin, Alexander. 2005. A descriptive and compartive grammar of Western Old Japanese. vol. 1. Folkestone: Global Oriental.
Washio Ryuichi. (2004) Auxiliary selection in the East. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 197–256
Watanabe, Akira. 2002. The loss of overt wh-movement in Old Japanese. In Syntactic effects of morphological change, ed. David W. Lightfoot, 179–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitman, John. 1997. Kakarimusubi from a Comparative Perspective. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 6, Ho-min Sohn and John Haig, 161–178. Stanford: CSLI.
Whitman, John. 2004. The reconstruction of the rentaikei and origins of the izenkei. Paper presented at the Oxford Kobe Symposium on the History of Japanese.
Whitman, John. 2005. Preverbal elements in Korean and Japanese. In The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque and Richard Kayne, 880–902. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wichmann, Søren. 2008. The study of semantic alignment: Retrospect and state of the art. In The typology of semantic alignment, ed. Søren Wichmann and Mark Donohue, 3–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wichmann Søren, Mark Donohue (2008) The typology of semantic alignment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Woolford Ellen. (1997) Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 181–227
Wrona, Janick. 2006. Why Old Japanese was not an ergative language. ms., Kyoto University.
Wrona Janick. (2008) A study of Old Japanese syntax: Synchronic and diachronic aspects of the complement system. Global Oriental, London
Yamada, Masahiro. 2000. Shugo hyôji ga no seiryoku kakudai no yôso [The expansion of the use of the subject denotor ga: A comparison between the original Text of the Tale of Heike and Amakusaban Heike]. Kokugogaku 51-1: 1-14.
Yanagida, Yuko. 2005. Ergativity and bare nominals in Early Old Japanese. Paper Presented at Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics, Harvard University.
Yanagida Yuko. (2006) Word order and clause structure in Early Old Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 37–68
Yanagida, Yuko. 2007a. Miyagawa’s (1989) exceptions: An ergative analysis. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 55, ed. Yoichi Miyamoto, 265–276. Cambridge: MIT.
Yanagida, Yuko. 2007b. Jôdaigo no nôkakusei ni tsuite [On ergativity in Old Japanese]. In Nihongo no shubun genshô [Main clause phenomena in Japanese], ed. Nobuko Hasegawa, 147–188. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to the memory of S.-Y. Kuroda.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yanagida, Y., Whitman, J. Alignment and word order in Old Japanese. J East Asian Linguist 18, 101–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9043-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9043-2