Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric Variation in the Semantics of Comparison: Japanese vs. English

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a semantic analysis of comparison constructions in Japanese which is crucially different from the standard semantics of comparatives as developed for English and related languages. The interpretation of the Japanese comparison construction is determined to a larger extent by pragmatic strategies, as opposed to compositional semantics. The syntactically provided item of comparison (the constituent accompanying yori) does not, in contrast to an English than-clause, have a degree semantics; it ultimately contributes an individual. From this item the real comparison has to be inferred. We argue that Japanese does not have English-style degree operators and probably lacks abstraction over degree variables in the syntax altogether. The proposed analysis accounts for a number of empirical differences between Japanese and English. A more general outcome is that the semantics of comparison is subject to crosslinguistic variation. A parameter of language variation is suggested as the source of the differences we observe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Basilico (1996) ArticleTitle‘‘Head Position and Internally Headed Relative Clauses’‘ Language 72 498–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (1972) Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • A. Grosu F. Landman (1998) ArticleTitle‘‘Strange Relatives of the Third Kind’‘ Natural Language Semantics 6 125–170

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hamann (1991) ‘‘Adjectives’‘ Stechow Arnim von Wunderlich Dieter (Eds) Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research De Gruyter Berlin, New York 657–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1998) Negative Decomposition and Comparatives, tak presented at the University of Connecticut, 1998.

  • Heim, I. (2000) ‘‘Degree Operators and Scope,’’ Proceedings of SALT 6, Cornell University.

  • Heim, I. and A. Kratzer (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell.

  • H. Hoji (1998) ArticleTitle‘‘Null Object and Sloppy Identiy in Japanese’‘ Linguistic Inquiry 29 127–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Y. (1991) Operators and Empty Categories in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • P. Jacobson (1995) ‘‘On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives’‘ E. Bach E. Jelinck A. Kratzer B.H. Partee (Eds) Quantification in Natural Languages Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (1997) Projecting the Adjective: the Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.

  • A. Kikuchi (1987) Comparative Deletion in Japanese Yamagata University ms

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, S. (1973), The Structure of the Japanese Language, MIT Press.

  • S.-Y. Kuroda (1974) ArticleTitle‘‘Pivot-Independent Relativization in Japanese (I)’‘ Papers in Japanese Linguistics 3 3 59–93

    Google Scholar 

  • S.-Y. Kuroda (1975/1976) ArticleTitle‘‘Pivot-independent Relativization in Japanese (II)’‘ Papers in Japanese Linguistics 4 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • S.-Y. Kuroda (1976/1977) ArticleTitle‘‘Pivot-independent Relativization in Japanese (III)’‘ Papers in Japanese Linguistics 5 157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • S.-Y. Kuroda (1992) Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Collected Papers Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • S.-Y. Kuroda (1999) ‘‘Syuyoobu Naizaigata Kankeisetu [Head Internal Relative Clauses] Kuroda Nakamura (Eds) Kotoba no Kaku to Syuuen: Nihongo to Eego Ho Aida [Core and Outer Domain Language: Between Japanese and English] Kurosiosyuppan Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, C. (2001) ‘‘Result Clauses,’’ Proceedings of SALT II, Cornell University.

  • K. Mihara (1994) Nihongo no Toogo Koozo [Syntactic Structure of Japanese Language] Shookakusya Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Murasugi, K. (1991) Noun Phrases in Japanese and English: A Case Study in Syntax, Learnability and Acquisition, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Murasugi, K. (2000) ‘‘Japanese Complex Noun Phrases and the Antisymmetry Theory,’’ in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, MIT Press, pp. 211--234.

  • Rullmann, H. (1995) Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Saito, M. (1985) Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Saito, S., S.T. Oka, M. Hashimoto, and S. Homma (1988) ‘‘Notes on Relativization in Japanese’’, Tsukuba English Studies 7.

  • R. Schwarzschild K. Wilkinson (2002) ArticleTitle‘‘Quantifiers in Comparatives: A Semantics of Degree Based on Intervals’‘ Natural Language Semantics 10 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2001) Measure Phrases, talk presented at the University of Connecticut.

  • Y. Sharvit P. Stateva (2002) ArticleTitle‘‘Superlative Expressions Context and Focus Linguistics and Philosophy 25 453–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibuya, E. (2001) ‘‘Genji Monogatari no Sekai [The World of the Tale of Genji]’’, retrieved 5/25/2002 from http://www.sainet.or.Jp/~eshibuya/.

  • J. Shimoyama (2001) Wh-Constructions in Japanese PhD dissertation University of Massachussetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Snyder (1995) Language Acquisition and Language Variation: The Role of Morphology PhD dissertation MIT, distribution: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Snyder K. Wexler D. Das (1995) ‘‘The Syntactic Representation of Degree and Quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and Child English’‘ Proceedings of WCCFL XIII CSLI, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Stassen (1985) Comparison and Universal Grammar Blackwell Publishers Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Stateva (2000) ‘‘In Defense of the Movement Theory of Superlatives’‘ Proceedings of ESCOL 1999 Rebecca Daly and Anastasia Riehl (eds.), CLC Publications, Cornell University, pp. 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Tomioka (2002) ‘‘The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and Its Crosslinguistic Implications’‘ S. Kerstin S. Winkler (Eds) The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures John Benjamins Amsterdam/Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Uchibori (1991) ArticleTitle‘‘Head-Internal Relatives in Japanese’‘ Proceedings of the Kansai Linguistic Society 17 393–403

    Google Scholar 

  • A. von Stechow (1984) ArticleTitle‘‘Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison’‘ Journal of Semantics 3 1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Watanabe (1992) ArticleTitle‘‘Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of Wh-in-situ’‘ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1 255–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beck, S., Oda, T. & Sugisaki, K. Parametric Variation in the Semantics of Comparison: Japanese vs. English. J East Asian Linguis 13, 289–344 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-1289-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-1289-0

Keywords

Navigation