Pronominal inflection and NP ellipsis in German

Abstract

Indefinite and possessive pronouns in German such as ein-es ‘one’ and mein-er ‘mine’ bear strong inflectional endings unlike their determiner counterparts. Following Saab and Lipták (Stud Linguist 70(1):66–108, 2016), I argue that this difference in inflection is due to NP ellipsis, which creates a ‘stranded’ affix that subsequently docks onto the determiner. Assuming that adjectives are reattached by Local Dislocation allows us to account for the descriptive observation that the determiner and pronominal paradigms differ only in the same three exceptional cases where determiners do not bear overt inflection. Furthermore, I discuss how this approach can extend to similar data from Afrikaans, Dutch and English, as well as to split topicalization constructions in German. This analysis provides further support for Saab and Lipták’s proposal that inflection emerges as a direct result of ellipsis, rather than constituting part of the licensing conditions on ellipsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT.

  2. Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2011. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Multiple determiners and the structure of DPs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexiadou, Artemis, and Kerstin Gengel. 2012. NP ellipsis without focus movement/projections: The role of classifiers. In Contrasts and positions in information structure, ed. I. Kučerova, and A. Neeleman, 177–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alexiadou, Artemis, and Chris Wilder. 1998. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 303–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman, and Melita Stavrou (eds.). 2007. The noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2007. Obliteration vs. impoverishment in the Basque g-/z-constraint. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2008. A principled order to postsyntactic operations. Ms. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & Harvard University.

  10. Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, Carl Lee. 1978. Introduction to generative-transformational syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf Koeneman, and Marika Lekakou. 2009. Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics 45 (1): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bartos, Huba. 2000. VP-ellipsis and verbal inflection in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47 (1): 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Behaghel, Otto. 1928. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Vol. 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: C. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bentzen, Kristine, Jason Merchant, and Peter Svenonius. 2013. Deep properties of surface pronouns: Pronominal predicate anaphors in Norwegian and German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16 (2–3): 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bernstein, Judy B. 1993. Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. PhD diss., CUNY, New York.

  17. Bhatt, Christa. 1990. Die syntaktische Struktur der Nominalphrase im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of Left-Branch Extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59 (1): 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt, Patrick, and Eric Fuß. 2014. Most questionable pronouns: Variation between das- vs. was-relatives in German. Linguistische Berichte 239: 297–329.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bresnan, Joan. 1971. A note on the notion of “identity of sense anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 2 (4): 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Broekhuis, Hans, and Evelien Keizer. 2012. Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and noun phrases, vol. I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coene, Martine, and Yves D’hulst (eds.). 2002. From NP to DP. Volume I: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Corver, Norbert, and Marjo van Koppen. 2009. Let’s focus on noun phrase ellipsis. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 48: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corver, Norbert, and Marjo van Koppen. 2011. NP-ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro-comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (2): 371–421.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dékány, Éva. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. PhD diss., CASTL, University of Tromsø.

  27. Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und Relationen: Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Donaldson, Bruce C. 1993. A grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Duden, 2009. Die Grammatik, 8th ed. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Durrell, Martin. 1979. Some problems in the morphology of the German noun phrase. Transactions of the Philological Society 77 (1): 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Durrell, Martin. 2002. Hammer’s German grammar and usage, 4th ed. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eguren, Luis. 2010. Contrastive focus and nominal ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua 120: 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eisenberg, Peter. 2000. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Band 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9 (3): 241–288.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Embick, David. 2003. Locality, listedness and morphological identity. Studia Linguistica 57 (3): 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Embick, David. 2007a. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (1): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Embick, David. 2007b. Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33 (3–4): 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V\(^{\prime }\)-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (2): 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Engel, Ulrich. 2004. Deutsche Grammatik. Munich: Iudicium.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ewert, Manfred, and Fred Hansen. 1993. On the linear order of modifier-head-position in NPs. In The parameterization of Universal Grammar, ed. G. Fanselow, 161–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fanselow, Gisbert. 1986. On the sentential nature of prenominal adjectives in German. Folia Linguistica 20 (3–4): 341–380.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fanselow, Gisbert. 1988. Aufspaltung von NPn und das Problem der ‘freien’ Wortstellung. Linguistische Berichte 114: 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Damir Ćavar. 2002. Distributed deletion. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. A. Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fu, Jingqi, Thomas Roeper, and Hagit Borer. 2001. The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19 (3): 549–582.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gallmann, Peter. 1996. Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP. Linguistische Berichte 164: 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gallmann, Peter. 1998. Case underspecification in morphology, syntax and the lexicon. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 141–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gallmann, Peter. 2004. Feature sharing in DPs. In Explorations in nominal inflection, ed. G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun, 121–160. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Haider, Hubert. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In The View from Building 20, ed. K. Hale, and S.J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7 (3): 391–428.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning and processing. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.

  54. Harley, Heidi. 2005. One-replacement, unaccusativity, acategorial roots and bare phrase structure. In Harvard working papers in linguistics, ed. S. Gorbachov, and A. Nevins, 59–78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 2003. Distributed morphology. In The second Glot international state-of-the-article book, ed. L. Cheng, and R. Sybesma, 463–496. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hein, Johannes. 2017. Doubling and do-support in verbal fronting: Towards a typology of repair operations. Glossa 2 (1): 67–136.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Helbig, Gerhard, and Joachim Buscha. 2001. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Berlin: Langenscheidt.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hornstein, Norbert, and David W. Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. N. Hornstein, and D.W. Lightfoot, 9–31. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Houser, Michael, Line Mikkelsen, and Maziar Toosarvandani. 2007. Verb phrase pronominalization in Danish: Deep or surface anaphora? In Proceedings of WECOL 34, ed. E. Brainbridge, and B. Agbayani, 183–195. Fresno, CA: California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. \(\bar{X}\)-syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  61. Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, what it can’t, but not why. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin, and Chris Collins, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kandybowicz, Jason. 2007. Fusion and PF architecture. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (1): 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996a. Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP. Journal of Linguistics 31 (1): 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996b. The nature of adjectival inflection. PhD diss., Utrecht University.

  65. Kniffka, Gabriele. 1996. Np-Aufspaltung im Deutschen. Hürth: Gabel.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kobele, Gregory M., and Malte Zimmermann. 2012. Quantification in German. In Handbook of quantifiers in natural language, ed. E.L. Keenan, and D. Paperno, 227–283. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kornfeld, Laura, and Andrés Saab. 2004. Nominal ellipsis and morphological structure in Spanish. In Romance languages and linguistic theory, ed. R. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, B. Campers-Manhe, and P. Sleeman, 183–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. G.N. Carlson, and F.J. Pelletier, 125–176. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lakoff, George. 1970. Global rules. Language 46 (3): 627–639.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lasnik, Howard. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. In Explanation in linguistics, ed. N. Hornstein, and D. Lightfoot, 152–173. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, ed. P. Kempchinsky, and H. Campos, 151–175. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lechner, Winfried. 2014. Semantik der Pronomen. Ms. University of Athens.

  73. Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. PhD diss., New York University.

  74. Leu, Thomas. 2015. The architecture of determiners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive genitive constructions in German. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 109–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Llombart-Huesca, Amàlia. 2002. Anaphoric One and NP-ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 56 (1): 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lobeck, Anne. 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31 (5): 777–811.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological Merger and the mapping to phonological structure. In Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, ed. M. Hammond, and M. Noonan, 253–270. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Merchant, Jason. 1996. Object scrambling and quantifier float in German. In Proceedings of NELS 26, ed. K. Kusumoto, 179–193. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6): 661–738.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Merchant, Jason. 2013. Polarity items under ellipsis. In Diagnosing syntax, ed. L.L.-S. Cheng, and N. Corver, 441–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Merchant, Jason. 2014. Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis. Lingua 151: 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Merchant, Jason. to appear. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, ed. J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  86. Milner, Judith, and Jean-Claude Milner. 1972. La morphologie du groupe nominal en allemand. Paris: Univ. de Paris VII: DRLAV 2.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Müller, Gereon. 2002a. Remarks on nominal inflection in German. In More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, ed. I. Kaufmann, and B. Stiebels, 113–145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Müller, Gereon. 2002b. Syntaktisch determinierter Kasuswegfall in der deutschen DP. Linguistische Berichte 189: 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Müller, Gereon. 2018. Structure removal in complex prefields. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36 (1): 219–264.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Müller, Stefan. 2005. Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Linguistische Berichte 203: 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Murphy, Andrew. 2016. Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa 1 (1): 44–134.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Murphy, Andrew. 2018. A distinctness effect in the German noun phrase. Ms. Universität Leipzig.

  93. Muysken, Pieter, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1985. Projecting features and featuring projections. In Features and projections, ed. P. Muysken, and H. van Riemsdijk, 1–30. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Myler, Neil. 2013. Linearization and post-syntactic operations in the Quechua DP. In Challenges to linearization, ed. T. Biberauer, and I. Roberts, 171–210. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Nevins, Andrew. 2015. Lectures on postsyntactic morphology. Ms. University College London.

  96. Nolda, Andreas. 2007. Die Thema-Integration: Syntax und Semantik der ‘gespaltenen Topikalisierung’ im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Nunes, Jairo, and Cynthia Zocca. 2009. Lack of morphological identity and ellipsis resolution in Brazilian Portuguese. In Minimalist essays on Brazilian Portuguese, ed. Jairo Nunes, 215–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Olsen, Susan. 1987. Zum ‘substantivierten’ Adjektiv im Deutschen: Deutsch als eine pro-drop-Sprache. Studium Linguistik 21: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Olsen, Susan. 1989. Das Possessivum: Pronomen, Determinans oder Adjektiv. Linguistische Berichte 120: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Olsen, Susan. 1991a. AGR(eement) and Flexion in der deutschen Nominalphrase. In Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, ed. G. Fanselow, and S. Felix, 51–70. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Olsen, Susan. 1991b. Die deutsche Nominalphrase als ‘Determinansphrase’. In DET, COMP und INFL: Zur Syntax funktionaler Kategorien und grammatischer Funktionen, ed. S. Olsen, and G. Fanselow, 33–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ott, Dennis. 2012. Local instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Pafel, Jürgen. 1994. Zur syntaktischen Struktur nominaler Quantoren. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 13 (2): 236–275.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21 (2): 381–432.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Paul, Ilena. 2004. Bare nouns in the typology of DPs. Linguistica Atlantica 25: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Payne, John, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Barbara C. Scholz, and Eva Berlage. 2013. Anaphoric One and its implications. Language 89 (4): 794–829.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Perlmutter, David M. 1970. On the article in English. In Progress in linguistics, ed. M. Bierwisch, and K.E. Heidolph, 233–248. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Pesetsky, David. 1989. Language-particular processes and the Earliness Principle. Ms. MIT.

  109. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Picallo, M.Carme. 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3: 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (3): 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Report of the 17th annual round table meeting on language and linguistics, ed. F.P. Dinneen, 177–206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. R. Binnick, A. Davidson, G. Green, and J. Morgan, 205–239. Chicago, IL: CLS.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1979. Rule interaction and the organization of a grammar. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Barbara C. Scholz. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19 (1–2): 9–50.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax: A student’s guide to Chomsky’s Extended Standard Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Reuland, Eric. 1979. Principles of subordination and construal in the grammar of Dutch. PhD diss., University of Groningen.

  118. Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and semantics 26. Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing, ed. S. Rothstein, 37–62. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37 (2): 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Roehrs, Dorian. 2006. The morphosyntax of the Germanic noun phrase: Determiners move into the Determiner Phrase. PhD diss., Indiana University.

  122. Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Roehrs, Dorian. 2015. Inflections on pre-nominal adjectives: Main types, subtypes, and subset relations. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18 (3): 213–271.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Roehrs, Dorian. 2016. Adjectives are in phrasal positions. Ms. University of North Texas.

  125. Roehrs, Dorian, and Marit Julien. 2012. Adjectives in German and Norwegian: Differences in weak and strong inflections. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, ed. P. Sleeman, F. van de Velde, and H. Perridon, 245–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Saab, Andrés. 2009. Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la ellipsis. PhD diss., University of Buenos Aires.

  127. Saab, Andrés. to appear. Nominal ellipses. In The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, ed. J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  128. Saab, Andrés, and Anikó Lipták. 2016. Movement and deletion after syntax: Licensing by inflection reconsidered. Studia Linguistica 70 (1): 66–108.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Sadler, Louisa, and Douglas J. Arnold. 1994. Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction. Journal of Linguistics 30 (1): 187–226.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Schäfer, Roland. 2016. Einführung in die grammatische Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2nd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, dominance and doubling: The morphosyntax of DP. PhD diss., Universiteit Leiden.

  132. Schütze, Carson T. 2001. Semantically empty lexical heads as last resorts. In Semi-lexical categories: The function of content words and the content of function words, ed. N. Corver, and H. van Riemsdijk, 127–187. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Sleeman, Petra. 1996. Licensing empty nouns in French. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.

  134. Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2004. Feature checking, case and agreement in German DPs. In Explorations in nominal inflection, ed. G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun, 269–299. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Svenonius, Peter. 1994. The structural location of the attributive adjective. In Proceedings of WCCFL 12, ed. E. Duncan, D. Farkas, and P. Spaelti, 439–454. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Tappe, Thilo. 1989. A note on split topicalization in German. In Syntactic phrase-structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences, ed. C. Bhatt, E. Löbel, and C.M. Schmidt, 159–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Ticio, M.Emma. 2010. Locality domains in the Spanish Determiner Phrase. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Torrego, Esther. 1985. On empty categories in nominals. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Boston.

  139. van Hoof, Hanneke. 1997. On split topicalization and ellipsis. Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 112: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  140. van Hoof, Hanneke. 2006. Split topicalization. In Blackwell companion to syntax, 1st ed, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 410–465. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  141. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1983. The case of German adjectives. In Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles. Volume one: Categories, ed. F. Heny, and B. Richards, 222–252. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  142. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. P. Benincà, 105–136. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  143. van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006. Free relatives. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 338–382. Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Webber, Bonnie. 1978. A formal approach to discourse anaphora. PhD diss., Harvard University.

  145. Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (1): 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2 (2): 143–181.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2017. Formal and semantic agreement in syntax: A dual feature approach. In Language use and linguistic structure: Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016, ed. J. Emonds, and M. Janebová, 19–36. Olomouc: Palacký University.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1986. German adjective agreement in GPSG. Linguistics 24 (5): 957–990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For helpful feedback, I would like to thank audiences at Generative Grammatik des Südens 2017 at Leipzig University and the 31st Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (CGSW) in Stellenbosch, South Africa. I am particularly grateful to three anonymous reviewers, as well as Jim Wood, Susi Wurmbrand and Carole Boster, for useful and challenging comments that led to considerable improvement and expansion of this paper. Further thanks also go to Katja Barnickel, Johannes Hein and Martin Salzmann for discussion of the German data.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, A. Pronominal inflection and NP ellipsis in German. J Comp German Linguistics 21, 327–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9102-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inflection
  • Ellipsis
  • Distributed morphology
  • German