Skip to main content
Log in

Pronominal inflection and NP ellipsis in German

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indefinite and possessive pronouns in German such as ein-es ‘one’ and mein-er ‘mine’ bear strong inflectional endings unlike their determiner counterparts. Following Saab and Lipták (Stud Linguist 70(1):66–108, 2016), I argue that this difference in inflection is due to NP ellipsis, which creates a ‘stranded’ affix that subsequently docks onto the determiner. Assuming that adjectives are reattached by Local Dislocation allows us to account for the descriptive observation that the determiner and pronominal paradigms differ only in the same three exceptional cases where determiners do not bear overt inflection. Furthermore, I discuss how this approach can extend to similar data from Afrikaans, Dutch and English, as well as to split topicalization constructions in German. This analysis provides further support for Saab and Lipták’s proposal that inflection emerges as a direct result of ellipsis, rather than constituting part of the licensing conditions on ellipsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT.

  • Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2011. The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Multiple determiners and the structure of DPs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis, and Kerstin Gengel. 2012. NP ellipsis without focus movement/projections: The role of classifiers. In Contrasts and positions in information structure, ed. I. Kučerova, and A. Neeleman, 177–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis, and Chris Wilder. 1998. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 303–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman, and Melita Stavrou (eds.). 2007. The noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2007. Obliteration vs. impoverishment in the Basque g-/z-constraint. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2008. A principled order to postsyntactic operations. Ms. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & Harvard University.

  • Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Carl Lee. 1978. Introduction to generative-transformational syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf Koeneman, and Marika Lekakou. 2009. Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics 45 (1): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, Huba. 2000. VP-ellipsis and verbal inflection in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47 (1): 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behaghel, Otto. 1928. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Vol. 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: C. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen, Kristine, Jason Merchant, and Peter Svenonius. 2013. Deep properties of surface pronouns: Pronominal predicate anaphors in Norwegian and German. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16 (2–3): 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Judy B. 1993. Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. PhD diss., CUNY, New York.

  • Bhatt, Christa. 1990. Die syntaktische Struktur der Nominalphrase im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of Left-Branch Extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59 (1): 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Patrick, and Eric Fuß. 2014. Most questionable pronouns: Variation between das- vs. was-relatives in German. Linguistische Berichte 239: 297–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan. 1971. A note on the notion of “identity of sense anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 2 (4): 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broekhuis, Hans, and Evelien Keizer. 2012. Syntax of Dutch: Nouns and noun phrases, vol. I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coene, Martine, and Yves D’hulst (eds.). 2002. From NP to DP. Volume I: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert, and Marjo van Koppen. 2009. Let’s focus on noun phrase ellipsis. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 48: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert, and Marjo van Koppen. 2011. NP-ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro-comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (2): 371–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dékány, Éva. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP: The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional sequence. PhD diss., CASTL, University of Tromsø.

  • Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und Relationen: Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Bruce C. 1993. A grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duden, 2009. Die Grammatik, 8th ed. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, Martin. 1979. Some problems in the morphology of the German noun phrase. Transactions of the Philological Society 77 (1): 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, Martin. 2002. Hammer’s German grammar and usage, 4th ed. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguren, Luis. 2010. Contrastive focus and nominal ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua 120: 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Peter. 2000. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Band 1: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9 (3): 241–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2003. Locality, listedness and morphological identity. Studia Linguistica 57 (3): 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2007a. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (1): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2007b. Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33 (3–4): 303–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David, and Ralf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V\(^{\prime }\)-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (2): 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, Ulrich. 2004. Deutsche Grammatik. Munich: Iudicium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, Manfred, and Fred Hansen. 1993. On the linear order of modifier-head-position in NPs. In The parameterization of Universal Grammar, ed. G. Fanselow, 161–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert. 1986. On the sentential nature of prenominal adjectives in German. Folia Linguistica 20 (3–4): 341–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert. 1988. Aufspaltung von NPn und das Problem der ‘freien’ Wortstellung. Linguistische Berichte 114: 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert, and Damir Ćavar. 2002. Distributed deletion. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. A. Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Jingqi, Thomas Roeper, and Hagit Borer. 2001. The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19 (3): 549–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallmann, Peter. 1996. Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP. Linguistische Berichte 164: 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallmann, Peter. 1998. Case underspecification in morphology, syntax and the lexicon. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 141–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallmann, Peter. 2004. Feature sharing in DPs. In Explorations in nominal inflection, ed. G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun, 121–160. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert. 2010. The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In The View from Building 20, ed. K. Hale, and S.J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7 (3): 391–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning and processing. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.

  • Harley, Heidi. 2005. One-replacement, unaccusativity, acategorial roots and bare phrase structure. In Harvard working papers in linguistics, ed. S. Gorbachov, and A. Nevins, 59–78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 2003. Distributed morphology. In The second Glot international state-of-the-article book, ed. L. Cheng, and R. Sybesma, 463–496. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, Johannes. 2017. Doubling and do-support in verbal fronting: Towards a typology of repair operations. Glossa 2 (1): 67–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, Gerhard, and Joachim Buscha. 2001. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Berlin: Langenscheidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert, and David W. Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. N. Hornstein, and D.W. Lightfoot, 9–31. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, Michael, Line Mikkelsen, and Maziar Toosarvandani. 2007. Verb phrase pronominalization in Danish: Deep or surface anaphora? In Proceedings of WECOL 34, ed. E. Brainbridge, and B. Agbayani, 183–195. Fresno, CA: California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. \(\bar{X}\)-syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, what it can’t, but not why. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin, and Chris Collins, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandybowicz, Jason. 2007. Fusion and PF architecture. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (1): 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996a. Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP. Journal of Linguistics 31 (1): 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996b. The nature of adjectival inflection. PhD diss., Utrecht University.

  • Kniffka, Gabriele. 1996. Np-Aufspaltung im Deutschen. Hürth: Gabel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobele, Gregory M., and Malte Zimmermann. 2012. Quantification in German. In Handbook of quantifiers in natural language, ed. E.L. Keenan, and D. Paperno, 227–283. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfeld, Laura, and Andrés Saab. 2004. Nominal ellipsis and morphological structure in Spanish. In Romance languages and linguistic theory, ed. R. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, B. Campers-Manhe, and P. Sleeman, 183–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. G.N. Carlson, and F.J. Pelletier, 125–176. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1970. Global rules. Language 46 (3): 627–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. In Explanation in linguistics, ed. N. Hornstein, and D. Lightfoot, 152–173. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, ed. P. Kempchinsky, and H. Campos, 151–175. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Winfried. 2014. Semantik der Pronomen. Ms. University of Athens.

  • Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. PhD diss., New York University.

  • Leu, Thomas. 2015. The architecture of determiners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive genitive constructions in German. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou, and C. Wilder, 109–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llombart-Huesca, Amàlia. 2002. Anaphoric One and NP-ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 56 (1): 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobeck, Anne. 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31 (5): 777–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological Merger and the mapping to phonological structure. In Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, ed. M. Hammond, and M. Noonan, 253–270. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 1996. Object scrambling and quantifier float in German. In Proceedings of NELS 26, ed. K. Kusumoto, 179–193. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6): 661–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2013. Polarity items under ellipsis. In Diagnosing syntax, ed. L.L.-S. Cheng, and N. Corver, 441–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. 2014. Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis. Lingua 151: 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason. to appear. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, ed. J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Milner, Judith, and Jean-Claude Milner. 1972. La morphologie du groupe nominal en allemand. Paris: Univ. de Paris VII: DRLAV 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gereon. 2002a. Remarks on nominal inflection in German. In More than words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, ed. I. Kaufmann, and B. Stiebels, 113–145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gereon. 2002b. Syntaktisch determinierter Kasuswegfall in der deutschen DP. Linguistische Berichte 189: 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gereon. 2018. Structure removal in complex prefields. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36 (1): 219–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Stefan. 2005. Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Linguistische Berichte 203: 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Andrew. 2016. Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa 1 (1): 44–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Andrew. 2018. A distinctness effect in the German noun phrase. Ms. Universität Leipzig.

  • Muysken, Pieter, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1985. Projecting features and featuring projections. In Features and projections, ed. P. Muysken, and H. van Riemsdijk, 1–30. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myler, Neil. 2013. Linearization and post-syntactic operations in the Quechua DP. In Challenges to linearization, ed. T. Biberauer, and I. Roberts, 171–210. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, Andrew. 2015. Lectures on postsyntactic morphology. Ms. University College London.

  • Nolda, Andreas. 2007. Die Thema-Integration: Syntax und Semantik der ‘gespaltenen Topikalisierung’ im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo, and Cynthia Zocca. 2009. Lack of morphological identity and ellipsis resolution in Brazilian Portuguese. In Minimalist essays on Brazilian Portuguese, ed. Jairo Nunes, 215–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Susan. 1987. Zum ‘substantivierten’ Adjektiv im Deutschen: Deutsch als eine pro-drop-Sprache. Studium Linguistik 21: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Susan. 1989. Das Possessivum: Pronomen, Determinans oder Adjektiv. Linguistische Berichte 120: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Susan. 1991a. AGR(eement) and Flexion in der deutschen Nominalphrase. In Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, ed. G. Fanselow, and S. Felix, 51–70. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Susan. 1991b. Die deutsche Nominalphrase als ‘Determinansphrase’. In DET, COMP und INFL: Zur Syntax funktionaler Kategorien und grammatischer Funktionen, ed. S. Olsen, and G. Fanselow, 33–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Dennis. 2012. Local instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, Jürgen. 1994. Zur syntaktischen Struktur nominaler Quantoren. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 13 (2): 236–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21 (2): 381–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Ilena. 2004. Bare nouns in the typology of DPs. Linguistica Atlantica 25: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Barbara C. Scholz, and Eva Berlage. 2013. Anaphoric One and its implications. Language 89 (4): 794–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M. 1970. On the article in English. In Progress in linguistics, ed. M. Bierwisch, and K.E. Heidolph, 233–248. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1989. Language-particular processes and the Earliness Principle. Ms. MIT.

  • Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, ed. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picallo, M.Carme. 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3: 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (3): 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Report of the 17th annual round table meeting on language and linguistics, ed. F.P. Dinneen, 177–206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. R. Binnick, A. Davidson, G. Green, and J. Morgan, 205–239. Chicago, IL: CLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1979. Rule interaction and the organization of a grammar. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Barbara C. Scholz. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 19 (1–2): 9–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, Andrew. 1981. Transformational syntax: A student’s guide to Chomsky’s Extended Standard Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, Eric. 1979. Principles of subordination and construal in the grammar of Dutch. PhD diss., University of Groningen.

  • Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and semantics 26. Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing, ed. S. Rothstein, 37–62. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth. 1992. Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37 (2): 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2006. The morphosyntax of the Germanic noun phrase: Determiners move into the Determiner Phrase. PhD diss., Indiana University.

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2015. Inflections on pre-nominal adjectives: Main types, subtypes, and subset relations. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18 (3): 213–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrs, Dorian. 2016. Adjectives are in phrasal positions. Ms. University of North Texas.

  • Roehrs, Dorian, and Marit Julien. 2012. Adjectives in German and Norwegian: Differences in weak and strong inflections. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, ed. P. Sleeman, F. van de Velde, and H. Perridon, 245–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saab, Andrés. 2009. Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la ellipsis. PhD diss., University of Buenos Aires.

  • Saab, Andrés. to appear. Nominal ellipses. In The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, ed. J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Saab, Andrés, and Anikó Lipták. 2016. Movement and deletion after syntax: Licensing by inflection reconsidered. Studia Linguistica 70 (1): 66–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, Louisa, and Douglas J. Arnold. 1994. Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction. Journal of Linguistics 30 (1): 187–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, Roland. 2016. Einführung in die grammatische Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2nd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, dominance and doubling: The morphosyntax of DP. PhD diss., Universiteit Leiden.

  • Schütze, Carson T. 2001. Semantically empty lexical heads as last resorts. In Semi-lexical categories: The function of content words and the content of function words, ed. N. Corver, and H. van Riemsdijk, 127–187. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman, Petra. 1996. Licensing empty nouns in French. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.

  • Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2004. Feature checking, case and agreement in German DPs. In Explorations in nominal inflection, ed. G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun, 269–299. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenonius, Peter. 1994. The structural location of the attributive adjective. In Proceedings of WCCFL 12, ed. E. Duncan, D. Farkas, and P. Spaelti, 439–454. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappe, Thilo. 1989. A note on split topicalization in German. In Syntactic phrase-structure phenomena in noun phrases and sentences, ed. C. Bhatt, E. Löbel, and C.M. Schmidt, 159–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticio, M.Emma. 2010. Locality domains in the Spanish Determiner Phrase. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrego, Esther. 1985. On empty categories in nominals. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Boston.

  • van Hoof, Hanneke. 1997. On split topicalization and ellipsis. Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 112: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoof, Hanneke. 2006. Split topicalization. In Blackwell companion to syntax, 1st ed, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 410–465. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1983. The case of German adjectives. In Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles. Volume one: Categories, ed. F. Heny, and B. Richards, 222–252. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar, ed. P. Benincà, 105–136. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006. Free relatives. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. M. Everaert, and H. van Riemsdijk, 338–382. Blackwell: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, Bonnie. 1978. A formal approach to discourse anaphora. PhD diss., Harvard University.

  • Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (1): 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2 (2): 143–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbrand, Susi. 2017. Formal and semantic agreement in syntax: A dual feature approach. In Language use and linguistic structure: Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016, ed. J. Emonds, and M. Janebová, 19–36. Olomouc: Palacký University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1986. German adjective agreement in GPSG. Linguistics 24 (5): 957–990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For helpful feedback, I would like to thank audiences at Generative Grammatik des Südens 2017 at Leipzig University and the 31st Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (CGSW) in Stellenbosch, South Africa. I am particularly grateful to three anonymous reviewers, as well as Jim Wood, Susi Wurmbrand and Carole Boster, for useful and challenging comments that led to considerable improvement and expansion of this paper. Further thanks also go to Katja Barnickel, Johannes Hein and Martin Salzmann for discussion of the German data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, A. Pronominal inflection and NP ellipsis in German. J Comp German Linguistics 21, 327–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9102-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9102-z

Keywords

Navigation