Abstract
In this paper, I present new data from several German dialects concerning the order of pronominal subjects and objects. The data are taken from three sources (Wenker survey, Bavarian Linguistic Atlas, Syntax of Hessian Dialects) and cover a time span of nearly 150 years, thus providing a very robust empirical basis. Although the canonical order in all German varieties is subject before object and this serialization holds for pronominal as well as for non-pronominal arguments, a certain proportiom of reverse orders for pronouns is attested in all three data sources. That is, there are speakers of various dialectal varieties who prefer object before subject as the unmarked order of pronouns (e.g., haben dir sie geholfen lit. ‘have you they helped’). I will try to explain the emergence of the reverse order adopting the null subject cycle (NSC) proposed by Fuß and Wratil (2013) as a point of departure and modifying it into a more general pronoun cycle (PC): The PC implies the development of reduced pronouns out of full ones, which then replace clitic or null pronouns (depending on the person and number combination). The reverse order comprises the steps in the cycle where a clitic or a null subject pronoun is replaced with a reduced subject pronoun out of which eventually a clitic pronoun evolves. The reduced subject pronoun follows the object clitic as the clitic subject does as well for a short period of time before it is placed again before the object clitic. In the concluding section I discuss the observable mismatch between morphological paradigms and the syntactic level, in that syntax requires a tripartite distinction for which morphology mostly provides only two distinct forms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, Werner, and Anko Wiegel. 1993. Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In Dialektsyntax, ed. Werner Abraham and Joseph Bayer. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. LB Sonderheft 5.
Axel, Katrin, and Helmut Weiß. 2011. Pro-drop in the history of German: from Old High German to the modern dialects. In Empty pronouns, ed. Peter Gallmann and Melanie Wratil, 21–51. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274.
Breitbarth, Anne. 2005. Live fast, die young—the short life of Early Modern German auxiliary ellipsis. Ph.D. Diss., Tilburg University. Utrecht: LOT dissertation 115. (Dissertation).
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1999. Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 34–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michel Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammaticalclasses. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.
Chambers, J.K., and Peter Trudgill. 2004. Dialectology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooper, Kathrin. 1999. On the nature and distribution of Zurich German pronominal clitics. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 711–772. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology / Eurotyp 20–5.
Corver, Norbert, and Denis Delfitto. 1999. On the nature of pronoun movement. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, ed. Henk van Riemsdijk, 799–861. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Eurotyp 20–25.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Marjo van Koppen. 2008. Pronominal doubling in Dutch dialects: Big DPs and coordinations. In Microvariation in syntactic doubling, ed. Sjef Barbiers, Olav Koeneman, and Maria Lekakou, 207–239. Bingley: Emerald. Syntax and Semantics 36.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.
Fleischer, Jürg. forthc. Pro-Drop und Pronominalenklise in den Dialekten des Deutschen: eine Auswertung von Wenkersatz 12. In Deutsche Dialekte: Konzepte, Probleme, Handlungsfelder. Akten des 4. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD), ed. Michael Elementaler and Markus Hundt. Stuttgart: Steiner (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik Beihefte).
Fleischer, Jürg, Simon Kasper, and Alexandra N. Lenz. 2012. Die Erhebung syntaktischer Phänomene durch die indirekte Methode: Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen aus dem Forschungsprojekt „Syntax hessischer Dialekte“(SyHD). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 79(1): 1–42.
Freidin, Robert, and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 2001. Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111: 639–666.
Fuß, Eric. 2005. The rise of agreement. A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fuß, Eric. 2008. Multiple agreement and the representation of inflection in the C-domain. Linguistische Berichte 213: 78–108.
Fuß, Eric, and Melani Wratil. 2013. Der Nullsubjektzyklus: Etablierung und Verlust von Nullargumenten. In Comparing Diachronies, ed. Jürg Fleischer and Horst Simon, 163–196. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin, and Markus Steinbach. 2003a. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 1: Clause-internal positions. Linguistische Berichte 195: 257–294.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin, and Markus Steinbach. 2003b. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 2: Fronting. Linguistische Berichte 196: 459–490.
Gruber, Anton. 1989. Die Westallgäuer Mundart. 1. Grammatik. Sprache - Literatur und Geschichte 2. Winter: Heidelberg.
Haag-Merz, Christine. 1996. Pronomen im Schwäbischen - Syntax und Erwerb. Univ. Stuttgart. Edition Wissenschaft, Reihe Sprachwissenschaften Bd. 6. (Dissertation)
Haftka, Brigitta. 1981. Reihenfolgebeziehungen im Satz. In Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik, ed. Karl-Erich Heidolph et al., 702–764. Berlin: Akademieverlag.
Haider, Hubert. 1993. Deutsche syntax—Generativ. Tübingen: Narr.
Haider, Hubert, and Inger Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling.[Sprache und Pragmatik 49] Lund: Germanistisches Institut.
Harnisch, Rüdiger. 1989. Die sogenannte ‚sogenannte Flexion der Konjunktionen‘. Ein Paradigma aus der Bavaria thuringica. In Bayerisch-österreichische Dialektforschung, ed. Erwin Koller et al., 283–290. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann.
Hoberg, Ursula. 1997. Die Linearstruktur des Satzes. In Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, ed. Gisela Zifonun, Ludger Homann, and Bruno Strecker, 1498–1680. [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache] Berlin/ New York: de Gruyter.
Hofmann, Ute. 1994. Zur Topologie im Mittelfeld: Pronominale und nominale Satzglieder. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Höhle, Tilman. 1982. Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsprodukten im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1: 76–112.
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1977. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1992. Zur Syntax der Pronomina im Deutschen, Sprache und Pragmatik 29. Lund: University of Lund.
Müller, Gereon. 2002. Harmonic alignment and the hierarchy of pronouns in German 2001. In Pronouns—Grammar and representation, ed. Horst Simon and Heike Wiese, 205–232. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nübling, Damaris. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte. Tübingen: Narr.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Seiler, Guido. 2012. Non-standard average European. Talk at the IGDD-Kongress, Universität Kiel, 15.9.2012.
Staedele, Alfons. 1927. Syntax der Mundart von Stahringen. Moritz Schauenburg: Lahr i.Br.
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2007. Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, vol. 1. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Strobel, Thomas. 2012. On the areal and syntactic distribution of indefinite-partitive pronouns in German: methodological advances and empirical results within the project “Syntax of Hessian Dialects” (SyHD). In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr). Lisbon 2011, ed. Xosé Afonso Álvarez Pérez, Ernestina Carrilho, and Catarina Magro. http://limiar.clul.ul.pt, Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa.
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011a. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011b. Language change as cyclical. Studies in Modern English 27: 1–23.
Volodina, Anna, and Weiß, Helmut. forthc. Diachronic development of null subjects in German. In Firm foundations: Quantitative approaches to grammar and grammatical change, ed. Yannick Versley and Sam Featherston. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs).
Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Linguistische Arbeiten 391.
Weiß, Helmut. 2004. Information structure meets Minimalist syntax. On argument order and case morphology in Bavarian. In The Composition of meaning: From lexeme to discourse, ed. Alice ter Meulen and Werner Abraham, 139–165. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 255.
Weiß, Helmut. 2005. Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72(2): 148–166.
Weiß, Helmut. 2013. UG und syntaktische (Mikro-)Variation. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand. Zu Mikro-/Varietätenlinguistik, Sprachenvergleich und Universalgrammatik, ed. Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss, 171–204. Sonderheft Linguistische Berichte.
Weiß, Helmut. forthc. a. Pronominalsyntax deutscher Dialekte. In Syntaktische Variation – areallinguistische Perspektiven, ed. Alexandra L. Lenz and Franz Patocka. Wien: Wiener Linguistische Arbeiten.
Weiß, Helmut. forthc. b. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement – The emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the German middle field. In Clause structure and word order in the history of German, eds. Gisella Ferraresi, Agnes Jäger, and Helmut Weiß.
Werner, Ingegerd. 1999. Die Personalpronomen im Zürichdeutschen. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Lunder germanistische Forschungen 63.
Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 143–181.
Yoshida, Mitsunobu. 1999. Zur Bewegung der Personalpronomina im Deutschen. Studies in Language and Culture 25: 1–28.
Sources
[BSA – SBS] König, Werner (ed.) 2003. Bayerischer Sprachatlas. Sprachatlas von Bayerisch-Schwaben. Band 9,2: Formengeographie II. Heidelberg.
[BSA – SMF] Heyse, Thurid et al. 2007. Bayerischer Sprachatlas. Sprachatlas von Mittelfranken Vol. 7: Morphologie und Syntax. Heidelberg.
[DiWA] Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Joachim Herrgen (eds.) 2001–2009. Digitaler Wenkeratlas. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. http://www.diwa.info.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiß, H. When the subject follows the object. On a curiosity in the syntax of personal pronouns in some German dialects. J Comp German Linguistics 18, 65–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-015-9071-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-015-9071-4