Abstract
This paper proposes a new treatment of parasitically licensed negative polarity items, based on the idea that indefinite negative polarity items may optionally incorporate a negative feature from their licenser, and thus acquire the necessary features to in turn license a negative polarity item. The process of negative incorporation is that of Klima (Negation in English. In J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 246–323, 1964), but now viewed as a potentially covert operation and offers an alternative to den Dikken’s (J. Comp. Germ. Linguist., 5:35–66, 2002) seminal account of parasitic licensing. Some advantages of the covert incorporation proposal are sketched, including two applications outside the area of polarity licensing: adverbial modification by approximative adverbs, and emphatic reduplication.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
de Swart, H. & Sag, I. A. (2002). Negation and Negative Concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 373–417.
den Besten, H. (1986). Double negation and the genesis of Afrikaans. In P. Muysken & N. Smith (Eds.) Substrata versus universals in Creole languages. Papers from the Amsterdam Creole workshop, April 1985 (pp. 185–230). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
den Dikken, M. (2002). Direct and indirect polarity item licensing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5, 35–66.
den Dikken, M. (2006). Parasitism, secondary triggering and depth of embedding. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. H. Portner (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
den Dikken, M., & Giannakidou, A. (2002). From Hell to Polarity: ‘Aggressively Non-D-Linked’ Wh-Phrases as Polarity Items. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 31–61.
Déprez, V. (1997). Two types of Negative Concord. Probus, 9, 103–142.
Engdahl, E. (1983). Parasitic Gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 5–34.
Falkenberg, G. (2001) Lexical Sensitivity in Negative Polarity Verbs. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sánchez-Valencia, & T. van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, A. (2000). Negative concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, 457–523.
Haegeman, L. (1995). The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Hoeksema, J. (1997). Negation and Negative Concord in Middle Dutch. In D. Forget, P. Hirschbühler, F. Martineau, & M.-L. Rivero (Eds.), Negation and Polarity. Syntax and Semantics (pp. 139–156). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hoeksema, J. (2001). X maar dan ook echt X! Emfatische reduplicerende nevenschikking. Tabu, 31, 119–140.
Hoeksema, J., & Klein, H. (1995). Negative Predicates and Their Arguments. Linguistic Analysis, 25, 146–180.
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Horn, L. R. (1978). Remarks on Neg-Raising. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 129–220). New York: Academic.
Horn, L. R. (2001). Flaubert Triggers, Squatitive Negation, and Other Quirks of Grammar. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sánchez-Valencia, & T. van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items (pp. 173–200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Huang, J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Israel, M. (1996). Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 619–666.
Israel, M. (1998). The Rhetoric of Grammar: Scalar Reasoning and Polarity Sensitivity. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.
Kayne, R. S. (1983). Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 223–250.
Klima, E. (1964). Negation in English. In J.A. Fodor & J.J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language (pp. 246–323). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Labov, W. (1972). Negative Attraction and Negative Concord in English Grammar. Language, 48, 773–818.
Ladusaw, W. A. (1992). Expressing negation. In S. Moore & A. Zachary Wyner (Eds.), SALT II. Proceedings of the second conference on semantics and linguistic theory (pp. 237–259). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Landman, F. & Kadmon, N. (1993). Any. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 353–422.
Muller, C. (1991). La négation en français. Geneva: Droz.
Postal, P. M. (2000). A Remark on English Double Negatives. Ms., New York University.
Postal, P. M. (2005). Suppose (if only for an hour) that negative polarity items are negation-containing phrases. Ms., New York University.
Progovac, L. (1994). Positive and Negative Polarity: A Binding Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, N. (1998). The Principle of Minimal Compliance. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 599–629.
van der Wouden, T. & F. Zwarts (1993). A semantic treatment of negative concord. In U. Lahiri & A. Z. Wyner (Eds.) Proceedings of SALT III (pp. 202–219). Ithaca: Cornell Linguistics Circle.
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zwarts, F. (1986). Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraïsche Semantiek. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hoeksema, J. Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items. J Comp German Linguistics 10, 163–182 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-007-9012-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-007-9012-y