Twenty years of ModelDB and beyond: building essential modeling tools for the future of neuroscience
- 761 Downloads
Neuron modeling may be said to have originated with the Hodgkin and Huxley action potential model in 1952 and Rall’s models of integrative activity of dendrites in 1964. Over the ensuing decades, these approaches have led to a massive development of increasingly accurate and complex data-based models of neurons and neuronal circuits. ModelDB was founded in 1996 to support this new field and enhance the scientific credibility and utility of computational neuroscience models by providing a convenient venue for sharing them. It has grown to include over 1100 published models covering more than 130 research topics. It is actively curated and developed to help researchers discover and understand models of interest. ModelDB also provides mechanisms to assist running models both locally and remotely, and has a graphical tool that enables users to explore the anatomical and biophysical properties that are represented in a model. Each of its capabilities is undergoing continued refinement and improvement in response to user experience. Large research groups (Allen Brain Institute, EU Human Brain Project, etc.) are emerging that collect data across multiple scales and integrate that data into many complex models, presenting new challenges of scale. We end by predicting a future for neuroscience increasingly fueled by new technology and high performance computation, and increasingly in need of comprehensive user-friendly databases such as ModelDB to provide the means to integrate the data for deeper insights into brain function in health and disease.
KeywordsModel sharing Model analysis Model discovery Reproducibility Neuroinformatics
This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 DC009977 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) and T15 LM007056 from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). We are grateful for platforms provided to us for the curation of ModelDB models including the Louise cluster (part of Yale’s HPC facilities operated by the Yale Center for Research Computing and Yale’s W.M. Keck Biotechnology Laboratory, funded by NIH grants: RR19895 and RR029676-01) and the Neuroscience Gateway (NSG) Portal (Sivagnanam et al. 2013) supported by the National Science Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andrews SS, Addy NJ, Brent R, Arkin AP (2010) Detailed simulations of cell biology with Smoldyn 2.1. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(3), e1000705.Google Scholar
- Ascoli, G. A. (2006). Mobilizing the base of neuroscience data: the case of neuronal morphologies. Nature. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 7, 318–324.Google Scholar
- Carnevale, T., Majumdar, A., Sivagnanam, S., Yoshimoto, K., Astakhov, V., Bandrowski, A., & Martone, M. (2014). The neuroscience gateway portal: high performance computing made easy. BMC Neuroscience, 15.Google Scholar
- Crook, SM, Davison, AP, Plesser, HE (2013) Learning from the past: approaches for reproducibility in computational neuroscience. 20 Years of Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York 73–102.Google Scholar
- Eliasmith, C., Stewart, T. C., Choo, X., Bekolay, T., DeWolf, T., Tang, C., & Rasmussen, D. (2012). A large-scale model of the functioning brain. Science 338, 1202–1205.Google Scholar
- Gleeson, P., Crook, S., Cannon, R. C., Hines, M. L., Billings, G. O., Farinella, M., Morse, T. M., Davison, A. P., Ray, S., Bhalla, U. S., & Barnes, S. R. (2010). NeuroML: a language for describing data driven models of neurons and networks with a high degree of biological detail. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(6), e1000815.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hines M (1993) NEURON—a program for simulation of nerve equations. In Neural systems: Analysis and modeling (pp. 127–136). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Insel, T. R., Landis, S. C., & Collins, F. S. (2013). The NIH brain initiative. Science, 340.Google Scholar
- Kasthuri, N., Hayworth, K. J., Berger, D. R., Schalek, R. L., Conchello, J. A., Knowles-Barley, S., Lee, D., Vázquez-Reina, A., Kaynig, V., Jones, T. R., Roberts, M., Morgan, J. L., Tapia, J. C., Seung, H. S., Ronca, W. G., Vogelstein, J. T., Burns, R., Sussman, D. L., Priebe, C. E., Pfister, H., & Lichtman, J. W. (2015). Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell, 162(3), 648–661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller, D., Babai, N., Kochubey, O., Han, Y., Markram, H., Schürmann, F., & Schneggenburger, R. (2015). An exclusion zone for Ca2+ channels around docked vesicles explains release control by multiple channels at a CNS synapse. PLoS Computational Biology 11, e1004253.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. K., & Forger, D. B. (2012). A mechanism for robust circadian timekeeping via stoichiometric balance. Molecular Systems Biology 8(630), 1–14. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.62.
- Le Franc, Y., Davison, A. P., Gleeson, P., Imam, F. T., Kriener, B., Larson, S. D., Ray, S., Schwabe, L., Hill, S., & De Schutter, E. (2012). Computational neuroscience ontology: a new tool to provide semantic meaning to your models. BMC Neuroscience, 13(Suppl 1).Google Scholar
- Le Novere, N., Bornstein, B., Broicher, A., Courtot, M., Donizelli, M., Dharuri, H., Li, L., Sauro, H., Schilstra, M., Shapiro, B., & Snoep, J. L. (2006). BioModels database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, D689–D691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin JB, Pechura CM eds (1991). Mapping the brain and its functions: integrating enabling technologies into Neuroscience Research (Vol. 91, No. 8). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- McDougal, R. A., Bulanova, A. S., Lytton, W. W. (2016) Reproducibility in computational neuroscience models and simulations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2539602.
- Migliore, M., Cavarretta, F., Hines, M. L., & Shepherd, G. M. (2014). Distributed organization of a brain microcircuit analysed by three-dimensional modeling: the olfactory bulb. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 8, 50.Google Scholar
- Morse, T., Carnevale, N. T., Mutalik, P., Migliore, M., & Shepherd, G. M. (2010). Abnormal excitability of oblique dendrites implicated in early Alzheimer’s: a computational study. Front in Neural Circuits, 4, 16.Google Scholar
- Neymotin, S. A., McDougal, R. A., Sherif, M. A., Fall, C. P., Hines, M. L., & Lytton, W. W. (2015). Neuronal calcium wave propagation varies with changes in endoplasmic reticulum parameters: a computer model. Neural Computation 27(4), 898–924.Google Scholar
- Neymotin, S. A., McDougal, R. A., Bulanova, A. S., Zeki, M., Lakatos, P., Terman, D., Hines, M. L., & Lytton, W. W. (2016). Calcium regulation of HCN channels supports persistent activity in a multiscale model of neocortex. Neuroscience 316, 344–366.Google Scholar
- Peterson, B. E., Healy, M. D., Nadkarni, P. M., Miller, P. L., & Shepherd, G. M. (1996). ModelDB: an environment for running and storing computational models and their results applied to neuroscience. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3, 389–398.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rall, W. (1964). Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for neuronal input-output relations. In R. F. Reiss (Ed.), Neural Theory and Modeling (pp. 73–97). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sivagnanam, S., Majumdar, A., Yoshimoto, K., Astakhov, V., Bandrowski, A., Martone, M. E., & Carnevale, N. T. (2013) Introducing the Neuroscience Gateway, IWSG, volume 993 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org. London, UK.Google Scholar
- Stiles, J. R., & Bartol, T. M. (2001). Monte Carlo methods for simulating realistic synaptic microphysiology using MCell. Computational Neuroscience: Realistic Modeling for Experimentalists, 87–127.Google Scholar
- Szigeti, B., Gleeson, P., Vella, M., Khayrulin, S., Palyanov, A., Hokanson, J., Currie, M., Cantarelli, M., Idili, G., & Larson, S. (2014). OpenWorm: an open-science approach to modeling Caenorhabditis elegans. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 8, 137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar