A network model comprising 4 segmental, interconnected ganglia, and its application to simulate multi-legged locomotion in crustaceans
- 239 Downloads
Inter-segmental coordination is crucial for the locomotion of animals. Arthropods show high variability of leg numbers, from 6 in insects up to 750 legs in millipedes. Despite this fact, the anatomical and functional organization of their nervous systems show basic similarities. The main similarities are the segmental organization, and the way the function of the segmental units is coordinated. We set out to construct a model that could describe locomotion (walking) in animals with more than 6 legs, as well as in 6-legged animals (insects). To this end, we extended a network model by Daun-Gruhn and Tóth (Journal of Computational Neuroscience, doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0300-1, 2011). This model describes inter-segmental coordination of the ipsilateral legs in the stick insect during walking. Including an additional segment (local network) into the original model, we could simulate coordination patterns that occur in animals walking on eight legs (e.g., crayfish). We could improve the model by modifying its original cyclic connection topology. In all model variants, the phase relations between the afferent segmental excitatory sensory signals and the oscillatory activity of the segmental networks played a crucial role. Our results stress the importance of this sensory input on the generation of different stable coordination patterns. The simulations confirmed that using the modified connection topology, the flexibility of the model behaviour increased, meaning that changing a single phase parameter, i.e., gating properties of just one afferent sensory signal was sufficient to reproduce all coordination patterns seen in the experiments.
KeywordsCentral pattern generator Inter-segmental coordination Network model Locomotion Sensory feedback Arthropods
We would like to thank Dr. A. Büschges for useful discussions in the course of the work. The work was supported by DFG Grants to SDG: DA1182/1-1, GR3690/2-1 and GR3690/4-1.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Akay, T., Bässler, U., Gerharz, P., Büschges, A. (2001). The Role of Sensory Signals From the Insect Coxa-Trochanteral Joint in Controlling Motor Activity of the Femur-Tibia Joint. The American Physiological Society Google Scholar
- Chasserat, C., & Clarac, F. (1983). Quantitative analysis of walking in a decapod crustacean, the rock lobster Jasus lalandii. II. Spatial and temporal regulation of stepping in driven walking. Journal of Experimental Biology, 107, 219–243.Google Scholar
- Clarac, F. (1982). Decapod crustacean leg coordination during walking. In C. F. Herreid & C. R. Fourtner (Eds.), Locomotion and energetics in arthropods (pp. 31–71). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Clarac, F., & Barnes, W. J. P. (1985). Peripheral influences on the coordination of the legs during walking in decapod crustaceans. In coordination of motor behaviour. In Soc. exp. Biol. Seminar Series 24 (pp. 249–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cruse, H. (1985). Which parameters control the leg movement of a walking insect?: I. Velocity control during the stance phase. Journal of Experimental Biology, 116, 343–355.Google Scholar
- Cruse, H. (1990). What mechanisms coordinate leg movement in walking arthropods. TINS, 1(13), 15–21.Google Scholar
- Cruse, H., & Müller, U. (1986). Two coupling mechanisms which determine the coordination of ipsilateral legs in the walking crayfish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 121, 349–369.Google Scholar
- Cruse, H., Dürr, V., Schilling, M., & Schmitz, J. (2009). Principles of insect locomotion. In P. Arena & L. Patanè (Eds.), Spatial Temporal Patterns for Action-Oriented Perception in Roving Robots (pp. 1–57). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hess, D., & Büschges, A. (1999). Role of proprioceptive signals from an insect femur-tibia joint in patterning motoneuronal activity of an adjacent leg joint. Journal of Neurophysiologly, 81, 1856–1865.Google Scholar
- Jamom, M., & Clarac, F. (1995). Locomotor patterns in freely moving crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). The Journal of Experimental Biology, 198, 683–700.Google Scholar
- Klärner, D., & Barnes, W. J. P. (1986). The cuticular stress detector (CSD2) of the crayfish. II. Activity during walking and influences on the leg coordination. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 122, 161–175.Google Scholar
- Klärner, D., & Barth, F. G. (1986). The cuticular stress detector (CSD2) of the crayfish I physiological properties. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 122, 149–159.Google Scholar
- Parrack, D.W. (1964). Stepping sequences in the crayfish. PhD. Thesis, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
- Ross, R. B., and Belanger, J. H. (2013). Passive Mechanical Properties of Crustacean Walking Legs. Poster, Sfn, Annual meeting, San Diego Google Scholar
- Sillar, I. K., Clarac, F., & Busch, B. M. H. (1987). Intersegmental coordination of central neural oscillators for rhythmic movements of the walking legs in crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 131, 245–264.Google Scholar
- Toth, T.I., Grabowska, M., Rosjat, N., Hellekes, K., Borgmann, A., Daun-Gruhn, S. (2015). Investigating inter-segmental connections between thoracic ganglia in the stick insect by means of experimental and simulated phase response curves. Biological Cybernetics. doi: 10.1007/s00422-015-0647-5