Neural mass models are successful in modeling brain rhythms as observed in macroscopic measurements such as the electroencephalogram (EEG). While the synaptic current is explicitly modeled in current models, the single cell electrophysiology is not taken into account. To allow for investigations of the effects of channel pathologies, channel blockers and ion concentrations on macroscopic activity, we formulate neural mass equations explicitly incorporating the single cell dynamics by using a bottom-up approach. The mean and variance of the firing rate and synaptic input distributions are modeled. The firing rate curve (F(I)-curve) is used as link between the single cell and macroscopic dynamics. We show that this model accurately reproduces the behavior of two populations of synaptically connected Hodgkin-Huxley neurons, also in non-steady state.
Mean field Neural mass Recurring network Firing rate curve Pathology Hodgkin-Huxley Variance Channel blockers
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
This work was financially supported by Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Provincie Overijssel and Provincie Gelderland through the ViPBrainNetworks project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Allen, C., & Stevens, C.F. (1994). An evaluation of causes for unreliability of synaptic transmission. Proceedings National Academy Science USA, 383 (10), 380–10.Google Scholar
Amit, D., & Brunel, N. (1997). Dynamics of a recurrent network of spiking neurons before and following learning Network Computation in Neural Systems.Google Scholar
Baladron, J., Fasoli, D., Faugeras, O., Touboul, J. (2012). Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of hodgkin-huxley and fitzhugh-nagumo neurons. Journal Mathematics Neuroscience, 2 (1), 10. doi:10.1186/2190-8567-2-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, B.S., Coyle, D., Maguire, L.P. (2011). A thalamo-cortico-thalamic neural mass model to study alpha rhythms in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 24 (6), 631–45. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2011.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chizhov, A., & Graham, L. (2007). Population model of hippocampal pyramidal neurons, linking a refractory density approach to conductance-based neurons. Physical Review E, 75(1) (011), 924. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.011924.Google Scholar
Faugeras, O., Touboul, J., Cessac, B. (2009). A constructive mean-field analysis of multi-population neural networks with random synaptic weights and stochastic inputs. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 3 (February), 1. doi:10.3389/neuro.10.001.2009.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G.R. (2011). Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain : a journal of neurology, 134 (Pt 5), 1264–76. doi:10.1093/brain/awr033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocepied, G., Legros, B., Van Bogaert, P., Grenez, F., Nonclercq, A. (2013). Early detection of epileptic seizures based on parameter identification of neural mass model. Computer Biology Medicine, 43 (11), 1773–1782. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.08.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, G. (1997). A critical reexamination of some assumptions and implications of cable theory in neurobiology. PhD thesis: California Institute of Technology. URL http://lnc.usc.edu/holt/papers/thesis/.
Hutt, A. (2013). The anesthetic propofol shifts the frequency of maximum spectral power in eeg during general anesthesia: analytical insights from a linear model. Front Computational Neuroscience, 7, 2. doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izhikevich, E.M. (2007). Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting: Computational neuroscience, vol First. MIT Press. URL http://www.amazon.com/dp/0262514206.
Jansen, B.H., & Rit, V.G. (1995). Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biology Cybernetics, 73 (4), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liley, D.T.J., Cadusch, P.J., Dafilis, M.P. (2002). A spatially continuous mean field theory of electrocortical activity. Network (Bristol England), 13 (1), 67–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manwani, A., & Koch, C. (1999). Detecting and estimating signals in noisy cable structure, i: neuronal noise sources. Neural Computation, 11 (8), 1797–1829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, J.D., Drover, J.D., Conte, M.M., Schiff, N.D. (2011). Mean-field modeling of thalamocortical dynamics and a model-driven approach to EEG analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 Suppl, 15, 631–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012168108.Google Scholar