The lack of a deeper understanding of how olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) encode odors has hindered the progress in understanding the olfactory signal processing in higher brain centers. Here we employ methods of system identification to investigate the encoding of time-varying odor stimuli and their representation for further processing in the spike domain by Drosophila OSNs. In order to apply system identification techniques, we built a novel low-turbulence odor delivery system that allowed us to deliver airborne stimuli in a precise and reproducible fashion. The system provides a 1% tolerance in stimulus reproducibility and an exact control of odor concentration and concentration gradient on a millisecond time scale. Using this novel setup, we recorded and analyzed the in-vivo response of OSNs to a wide range of time-varying odor waveforms. We report for the first time that across trials the response of OR59b OSNs is very precise and reproducible. Further, we empirically show that the response of an OSN depends not only on the concentration, but also on the rate of change of the odor concentration. Moreover, we demonstrate that a two-dimensional (2D) Encoding Manifold in a concentration-concentration gradient space provides a quantitative description of the neuron’s response. We then use the white noise system identification methodology to construct one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) cascade models of the sensory neuron for a fixed mean odor concentration and fixed contrast. We show that in terms of predicting the intensity rate of the spike train, the 2D LNP model performs on par with the 1D LNP model, with a root mean-square error (RMSE) increase of about 5 to 10%. Surprisingly, we find that for a fixed contrast of the white noise odor waveforms, the nonlinear block of each of the two models changes with the mean input concentration. The shape of the nonlinearities of both the 1D and the 2D LNP model appears to be, for a fixed mean of the odor waveform, independent of the stimulus contrast. This suggests that white noise system identification of Or59b OSNs only depends on the first moment of the odor concentration. Finally, by comparing the 2D Encoding Manifold and the 2D LNP model, we demonstrate that the OSN identification results depend on the particular type of the employed test odor waveforms. This suggests an adaptive neural encoding model for Or59b OSNs that changes its nonlinearity in response to the odor concentration waveforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bayesian Adaptive Regression Splines
Maximally informative dimensions
Olfactory sensory neuron
Peristimulus time histogram
Aertsen, A. M. H. J., & Johannesma, P. I. M. (1981). The spectro-temporal receptive field. A functional characteristic of auditory neurons. Biological Cybernetics, 42, 13343.
Aguera y Arcas, B., & Fairhall, A. (2003). What causes a neuron to spike? Neural Computation, 15, 1789–1807.
Bau, J., Justus, K., & Carde, R. (2002) Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. Journal of Insect Physiology, 48(4), 433–442.
Berry, M. J., & Meister, M. (1998). Refractoriness and neural precision. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2200–2211.
Brenner, N., Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. (2000). Statistical properties of spike trains: Universal and stimulus-dependent aspects. Neuron, 26(3), 695–702.
Bussgang, J. (1952). Crosscorrelation functions of amplitude-distorted Gaussian signals (Vol. 16, p. 3). Technical Report, Research Laboratory Of Electronics, MIT.
Clyne, P., Grant, A., O’Connell, R., & Carlson, J. (1997). Odorant response of individual sensilla on the Drosophila antenna. Invertebrate Neuroscience, 3(2), 127–135.
de Bruyne, M., Foster, K., & Carlson, J. (2001). Odor coding in the drosophila antenna. Neuron, 30(2), 537–552.
Dougherty, D. P., Wright, G. A., & Yew, A. C. (2005). Computational model of the cA.M.P.-mediated sensory response and calcium-dependent adaptation in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons. PNAS, 102, 2415.
Fairhall, A. L., Burlingame, C. A., Narasimhan, R., Harris, R. A., Puchalla, J. L., & Berry, M. J. (2006). Selectivity for multiple stimulus features in retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(5), 2724–2738.
French, A. S., & Meisner, S. (2007). A new method for wide frequency range dynamic olfactory stimulation and characterization. Chemical Senses, 32(7), 681–688.
Geffen, M. N., Broome, B. M., Laurent, G., & Meister, M. (2009). Neural encoding of rapidly fluctuating odors. Neuron, 61(4), 570–586.
Gomez, G., Voigt, R., & Atema, J. (1999). Temporal resolution in olfaction III: Flicker fusion and concentration-dependent synchronization with stimulus pulse trains of antennular chemoreceptor cells in the American lobster. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 185(5), 427–436.
Gu, Y., Lucas, P., & Rospars, J.-P. (2009). Computational model of the insect pheromone transduction cascade. PLoS Computers in Biology, 5(3), e100321.
Halnes, G., Ulfhielm, E., Ljunggren, E. E., Kotaleski, J. H., & Rospars, J.-P. (2009). Modelling and sensitivity analysis of the reactions involving receptor, G-protein and effector in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 27, 471.
Hinterwirth, A., Zeiner, R., & Tichy, H. (2004). Olfactory receptor cells on the cockroach antennae: Responses to the direction and rate of change in food odour concentration. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3389–3392.
Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation. Journal of Physiology, 117, 500–557.
Hunter, I. W., & Korenberg, M. J. (1986). The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and hammerstein cascade models. Biological Cybernetics 55(2–3), 135–144.
Justus, K., Carde, R., & French, A. S. (2005). Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2233–2239.
Kaissling, K.-L. (2009). Olfactory perireceptor and receptor events in moths: A kinetic model revised. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 195, 895.
Kass, R. E., Ventura, V., & Cai, C. (2003). Statistical smoothing of neuronal data. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 5–15.
Kass, R. E., Ventura, V., & Brown, E. N. (2005) Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 8–25.
Keat, J., Reinagel, P., Reid, R. C., & Meister, M. (2001). Predicting every spike: A model for the responses of visual neurons. Neuron, 30(3), 803–817.
Lemon, W., & Getz, W. (1997). Temporal resolution of general odor pulses by olfactory sensory neurons in American cockroaches. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200(Pt 12), 1809–1819.
Lindemann, B. (2001). Predicted profiles of ion concentrations in olfactory cilia in the steady state Biophysical Journal, 80, 1712.
Loftus, R. (1969). Differential thermal components in the response of the antennal cold receptor of Periplaneta americana to slowly changing temperature. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 63(4), 415–433.
Marmarelis, V. (2004). Nonlinear dynamic modeling of physiological systems. Wiley-IEEE Press.
Marmarelis, P. Z., & Naka, K. (1972). White-noise analysis of a neuron chain: An application of the Wiener theory. Science, 175(27), 1276–1278
Paninski, L. (2003). Convergence properties of three spike-triggered analysis techniques. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14(3), 437–464.
Paninski, L., Lau, B., & Reyes, A. (2003) Noise-driven adaptation: In vitro and mathematical analysis. Neurocomputing, 52, 877–883.
Pillow, J. (2007). Likelihood-based approaches to modeling the neural code. In: Bayesian brain: Probabilistic approaches to neural coding (chap. 3). MIT Press.
Pillow, J., & Simoncelli, E. (2006). Dimensionality reduction in neural models: An information-theoretic generalization of the spike-triggered average and covariance analysis. Journal of Vision, 6, 414–428.
Reich, D., Victor, J., & Knight, B. (1998). The power ratio and the interval map: Spiking models and extracellular recordings. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 10,090–10,104.
Reidl, J., Borowski, P., Sensse, A., Starke, J., Zapotocky, M., & Eiswirth, M. (2006). Model of calcium oscillations due to negative feedback in olfactory cilia. Biophysical Journal, 90, 1147.
Rospars, J.-P., Lansky, P., Duchamp, A., & Duchamp-Viret, P. (2003). Relation between stimulus and response in frog olfactory receptor neurons in vivo. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 1135.
Rust, N. C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2006). How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 9(11), 1421–1431.
Schuckel, J., Meisner, S., Torkkeli, P., & French, A. S. (2008). Dynamic properties of Drosophila olfactory electroantennograms. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 194, 483–489.
Schwartz, O., Pillow, J. W., Rust, N. C., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2006). Spike-triggered neural characterization. Journal of Vision 6(4), 484–507.
Sharpee, T., Rust, N. C., & Bialek, W. (2004). Analyzing neural responses to natural signals: Maximally informative dimensions. Neural Computation 16(2), 223–250.
Slee, S., Higgs, M., Fairhall, A., & Spain, W. (2005). Two-dimensional time coding in the auditory brainstem. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(43), 9978–9988.
Steveninck, R. V., & Bialek, W. (1988). Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: Coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 24, 379–414.
Tichy, H. (2003). Low rates of change enhance effect of humidity on the activity of insect hygroreceptors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 189, 175–179.
Tichy, H., Hinterwirth, A., & Gingl, E. (2005). Olfactory receptors on the cockroach antenna signal odour ON and odour OFF by excitation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 3147–3160.
Victor, J. D. (2005). Analyzing receptive fields, classification images and functional images: Challenges with opportunities for synergy. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1651–1656.
Victor, J., & Shapley, R. (1980). A. method of nonlinear analysis in the frequency domain. Biophysical Journal, 29, 459–484.
Wiener, N. (1958). Nonlinear problems in random theory. MIT Press.
Wu, M., David, S., & Gallant, J. (2006). Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 477–505.
The work presented here was supported by NIH under grant number R01DC008701-01 and was conducted in the Axel laboratory at Columbia University. The authors would like to thank Dr. Richard Axel for insightful discussions and for his outstanding support. The authors would like to also thank the reviewers for their suggestions for improving the presentation of the paper.
The authors’ names are alphabetically ordered.
Action Editor: C. Linster
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(PDF 4.33 MB)
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, A.J., Lazar, A.A. & Slutskiy, Y.B. System identification of Drosophila olfactory sensory neurons. J Comput Neurosci 30, 143–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-010-0265-0
- System identification
- Olfactory sensory neurons
- White noise analysis
- I/O modeling