Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Trap of Flexibility in ‘family-friendly’ Professions: Assessing Teachers’ Quality of Family Time Through Temporal Indicators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using time use diary data collected among 2603 teachers from the Flemish community of Belgium, this article investigates the ‘family friendliness’ of the teaching profession by exploring the family time of teachers in couple households with children. Teachers are an interesting case as the teaching profession is heavily feminised and considered to be a ‘family friendly’ occupation; it allows to synchronize the workers’ schedule with their children’s. Flexible work arrangements such as schedule or work-place flexibility function as so called ‘boundary-spanning strategies’. However, research on the impact of flexible work on work-life balance has shown mixed results. This paper develops a number of time-use based indicators to measure the quality of family time and validates these by relating them to work-life balance. Subsequently, it is assessed how teachers’ use of work time flexibility affects the quality of family time to evaluate whether this flexibility can be understood as a resource for increasing work-family balance. Results show that teachers with children have a better quality of family time and subsequently a better work-life balance if they work on standard hours rather than using their schedule flexibility to optimize the amount of family time.

Highlights

  • Postponing work from afternoons to evenings and weekends proves to be detrimental for the quality of family time.

  • The quality of family time is more important for self-reported work-life balance than the total amount of family time.

  • Uncontaminated family leisure time is positively associated with the perceived work-life balance.

  • Contaminated non-free time with family and fragmented shared time is negatively associated with the perceived work-life balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badawy, P. J., & Schieman, S. (2021). Controlling or channeling demands? How schedule control influences the link between job pressure and the work-family interface. Work and Occupations, 48(3), 320–352.

  • Bittman, M. (2005). Sunday working and family time. Labour & Industry, 16, 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79(1), 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, C., Wöhrmann, A. M., Frank, K., & Michel, A. (2019). Health and work-life balance across types of work schedules: A latent class analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 81, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzitheochari, S., & Arber, S. (2012). Class, gender and time poverty: A time-use analysis of British workers’ free time resources. British Journal of Sociology, 63(3), 451–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H. (2022). The Flexibility Paradox: Why Flexible Working Leads to (Self-)Exploitation. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151, 365–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cinamon, R. G., Rich, Y., & Westman, M. (2007). Teachers’ occupation-specific work-family conflict. The Career Development Quarterly, 55(3), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli. (2012). Family Friendly Occupations and the US Gender Wage Gap [Paper presentation]. Wollongong, Australia: 15th Annual Labour Econometrics Workshop 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L., & Powell, A. (2012). Dual-earner parents’ work-family time: The effects of atypical work patterns and non-parental childcare. Journal of Population Research, 29, 229–247.

  • Daly, K. J. (2001). Deconstructing family time: From ideology to lived experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhas, D. B., & Karthikeyan, P. (2015). Work-life balance challenges and solutions: Overview. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 2(12), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. D., Lawson, K. M., Almeida, D. M., Kelly, E. L., King, R. B., Hammer, L., Casper, L. M., Okechukwu, C. A., Hanson, G., & McHale, S. M. (2015). Parents’ daily time with their children: A workplace intervention. Pediatrics, 135(5), 875–882.

  • Epstein, C. F., Kalleberg, A. L., Epstein, C. F., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2004). Time and work: Changes and challenges. Fighting for Time: Shifting Boundaries of Work and Social Life (pp. 1–25). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, C., Lyonette, C., Smith, M., & Saldaña-Tejeda, A. (2012). The Influence of Working Time Arrangements on Work-Life Integration or ‘Balance’: A Review of the International Evidence. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucreault, A., Ménard, J., Houlfort, N., Trépanier, S-G., & Lavigne, G. L. (2022). How Work-Family Guilt, Involvement with Children and Spouse’s Support Influence Parents’ Life Satisfaction in a Context of Work-Family Conflict. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32, 1065–1077.

  • Garhammer, M. (1995). Changes in working hours in Germany: The resulting impact on everyday life. Time & Society, 4(2), 167–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. L., & Noonan, M. C. (2016). Telecommuting and earnings trajectories Among American Women and Men 1989-2008. Social Forces, 95(1), 217–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2012). Work-family role blurring and work-family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work & Occupations, 39, 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, L., & Kim, J. (2017). Irregular work shifts, work schedule flexibility and associations with work-family conflict and work stress in the U.S. [Paper presentation]. 5th conference of the Regulating for Decent Work Network 2017, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2016). A most egalitarian profession: Pharmacy and the evolution of a family-friendly occupation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 705–746.

  • Guest, D. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 41(2), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guryan, J., Hurst, E., & Kearney, M. (2008). Parental education and parental time with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., & Andrey, J. (2013). Remixing work family and leisure: teleworkers' experiences of everyday life New Technology. Work and Employment, 28(2), 130–144.

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, F., & Severin, F. O. (2011). Women and the teaching profession: Exploring the feminisation debate. London: Commonwealth Secretariat UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2020). Workplace flexibility and parent–child interactions among working parents in the US. Social Indicators Research, 151, 427–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Henly, J. R., Golden, L. M., & Lambert, S. J. (2020). Workplace Flexibility and Worker Well-Being by Gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 892–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer-Sadlik, T., & Paugh, A. (2007). Everyday moments: finding ‘quality time’ in American working families. Time & Society, 16(2-3), 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnard, L. (2008). Off-scheduling within dual-earner couples: An unequal and negative externality for family time 1. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 447–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott, Y., & Chung, H. (2016). Gender discrepancies in the outcomes of schedule control on overtime hours and income in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 752–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magda, I., & Keister, R. (2018). Working Time Flexibility and Parental ‘Quality Time’ Spent with Children. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11507.

  • Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The US experience. Social Forces, 81(3), 999–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkie, M., Kendig, S., Nomaguchi, K., & Denny, K. (2010). Time with children, children’s well-being, and work-family balance among employed parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1329–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkie, M. A., Mattingly, M. J., Nomaguchi, K. M., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). The time squeeze: Parental statuses and feelings about time with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 739–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnen, J., Glorieux, I., van Tienoven, T. P., Daniels, S., Weenas, D., Deyaert, J., Van den Bogaert, S., & Rymenants, S. (2014). Modular Online Time Use Survey (MOTUS). Translating an existing method in the 21st century. Electronic. International Journal of Time Use Research, 11(1), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnen, J., Verbeylen, J., & Glorieux, I. (2018). Onderzoek naar de tijdsbesteding van leraren in het basis- en secundair onderwijs. Deel 1: Algemeen. Brussel: Vlaamse Overheid, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep Sociologie, Onderzoeksgroep TOR.

  • Moen, P., Lam, J., Ammons, S., & Kelly, E. (2013). Time Work by Overworked Professionals: Strategies in Response to the Stress of Higher Status. Work and Occupations, 40(2), 79–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2022). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Education Indicators in Focus: Gender imbalances in the teaching profession. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2008). The emotional dimensions of family time and their implications for work-family balance. In K. Korabik, D. S. Lero & D. L. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of Work-Family Integration, Research, Theory, and Best Practices. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well- being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 809–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P., Den Dulk, L., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). The effects of time-spatial flexibility and new working conditions on employees’ work-life balance: the Dutch case. Community, Work and Family, 12(3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How do teachers spend their time? A study on teachers’ strategies of selection, optimisation, and compensation over their career cycle. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., & Craig, L. (2015). Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: Evidence from Australia. Work, Employment & Society, 29(4), 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffel, J. (2011). How Germans use their time: essays on the reconciliation of work and social life, PhD thesis. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). Is there a downside to schedule control for the work-family interface? Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1391–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C., & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 163–181.

  • Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home‐based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co‐residents. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 123–145.

  • Te Braak, P., Van Droogenbroeck, F., Minnen, J., Van Tienoven, T. P., & Glorieux, I. (2022). Teachers’ working time from time-use data: Consequences of the invalidity of survey questions for teachers, researchers, and policy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tienoven, T. P., Minnen, J., Glorieux, A., Laurijssen, I., Te Braak, P., & Glorieux, I. (2023). Locking down gender roles? a time-use perspective on gender division of household labour during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Belgium. Journal of Family Issues, 44(3), 654–680.

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work‐family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of marriage and family, 67(4), 822–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2001). The influence of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations, 50(3), 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology—Faculty of Social Sciences and Solvay Business School, Research Group BRISPO, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussel, Belgium

    Ilse Laurijssen, Julie Verbeylen, Francisca Mullens & Hélène Lemblé

Authors
  1. Ilse Laurijssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie Verbeylen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisca Mullens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hélène Lemblé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisca Mullens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurijssen, I., Verbeylen, J., Mullens, F. et al. The Trap of Flexibility in ‘family-friendly’ Professions: Assessing Teachers’ Quality of Family Time Through Temporal Indicators. J Child Fam Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02820-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02820-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation