Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting Questionnaire: Psychometric Characteristics of a Revised Version

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the development of the Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting Questionnaire (PDEPQ), which assesses key parental cognitions underlying punitive parental behaviours, namely 1) Approval of Physical Punishment; 2) Approval of Non-Physical Punishment; 3) Subjective Norms; and 4) Parenting Self-Efficacy. In Study 1, two samples (parents, professionals) were recruited to assess the content validity of the four scales, following which a revised version was created. In Study 2, the revised PDEPQ was administered to 400 Canadian parents to examine the factor structure as well its reliability and validity. Results indicated a good factor structure of the scales, but several items were removed to achieve a better fit. Internal consistency of the four scales ranged from acceptable to excellent. Correlations between the scale scores at the two time points were large in magnitude and significant, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. Furthermore, correlations between the PDEPQ scales and measures of similar constructs were significant and in the expected direction, indicating a strong alignment of each scale with its respective construct of interest. In conclusion, findings from these various studies indicate good psychometric properties of the PDEPQ scales, as well as strong evidence of construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

Highlights

  • Psychometric assessment of a novel measurement instrument to assess parents’ social cognitions of physical and emotional punitive parenting.

  • Validation of a measurement instrument assessing of attitudes toward physical and emotional punishment, social norms, and sense of self-efficacy.

  • Use of Items Response Theory analysis in parenting research to assess dimensions of punitive parenting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. M. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 798–844). Winchester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2018). What’s the best way to discipline my child? Retrieved from: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/family-life/family-dynamics/communication-discipline/Pages/Disciplining-Your-Child.aspx.

  • Ateah, C. A., & Durrant, J. E. (2005). Maternal use of corporal punishment in response to child misbehavior: Implications for child abuse prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland College Park, MD.

  • Barnes, C. R., & Adamson‐Macedo, E. N. (2007). Perceived Maternal Parenting Self‐Efficacy (PMP S‐E) tool: development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonates. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04445.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bugental, D. B., & Johnston, C. (2000). Parental and child cognitions in the context of the family. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2011). IRTPRO for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (2000). Parenting self-efficacy among mothers of school-age children: Conceptualization, measurement, and correlates. Family Relations, 49, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00013.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, J. L., Irwin, L. M., Milner, J. S., Skowronski, J. J., Rutledge, E., & Davila, A. L. (2017). Do hostile attributions and negative affect explain the association between authoritarian beliefs and harsh parenting? Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ayala, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Public.

  • Dadds, M. R., & Tully, L. A. (2019). What is it to discipline a child: What should it be? A reanalysis of time-out from the perspective of child mental health, attachment, and trauma. American Psychologist, 74(7), 794 https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, J. E. (2007, 2013). Positive discipline: What it is and how to do it. Save the Children Sweden Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

  • Durrant, J. E., Plateau, D. P., Ateah, C., Stewart-Tufescu, A., Jones, A., Ly, G., Barker, L., Holden, G., Kearley, C., MacAulay, J., Peters, R. D., & Tapanya, S. (2014). Preventing punitive violence: preliminary data on the Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting (PDEP) Program. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 33, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-2014-018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoff, E. T., Grogan‐Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Zelli, A., Deater‐Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent discipline practices in an international sample: Associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child development, 81(2), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x.

  • Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000191.

  • Fang, Y., Boelens, M., Windhorst, D. A., Raat, H., & van Grieken, A. (2021). Factors associated with parenting self‐efficacy: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(6), 2641–2661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, C. B., & Hunt, C. (2019). Parental behavioural control in adolescence: How does it affect self-esteem and self-criticism? Journal of Adolescence, 73, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.004.

  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamovitch, E. K., Acri, M. C., & Bornheimer, L. A. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between parenting self-efficacy, the quality of parenting, and parental and child emotional health. Journal of Family Social Work, 22(4-5), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2019.1635939.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Durrant, J. E., & Gershoff, E. T. (2017). Researchers deserve a better critique: Response to Larzelere, Gunnoe, Roberts, and Ferguson. Marriage & Family Review, 53(5), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1308899.

  • Holden, G. W. (2020). Why do parents hit their children? From cultural to unconscious determinants. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 73(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.2020.1690858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W., & Buck, M. J. (2002). Parental attitudes toward child rearing. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting. 2nd ed. (pp. 537–562). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W., Coleman, S. M., & Schmidt, K. L. (1995). Why 3-year-old children get spanked: Parent and child determinants as reported by college-educated mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 431–452. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23087935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Item response theory. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, J. W., & Claussen, A. H. (2017). Evidence base update for psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46, 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1310044.

  • Khoury-Kassabri, M., Attar-Schwartz, S., & Zur, H. (2014). Understanding the mediating role of corporal punishment in the association between maternal stress, efficacy, co-parenting and children’s adjustment difficulties among Arab mothers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(6), 1073–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. M., Albright, J., Deling, L., Dore-Stites, D., & Drayton, A. K. (2020). Longitudinal relationship between time-out and child emotional and behavioral functioning. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 41(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

  • Larzelere, R. E., Gunnoe, M. L., Roberts, M. W., & Ferguson, C. J. (2017). Children and parents deserve better parental discipline research: Critiquing the evidence for exclusively “positive” parenting. Marriage & Family Review, 53(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2016.1145613.

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Routledge.

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2005). Limited-and full-information estimation and goodness-of-fit testing in 2 n contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(471), 1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000002069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2006). Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika, 71(4), 713 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsteller, J. A., Hsu, Y. J., Chan, K. S., & Lubomski, L. H. (2017). Assessing content validity and user perspectives on the Team Check-up Tool: Expert survey and user focus groups. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(4), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (2003). Social information processing in high-risk and physically abusive parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00506-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R. O. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(4), 353–369.

  • Perron, J. L., Lee, C. M., LaRoche, K. J., Ateah, C., Clément, M. È., & Chan, K. (2014). Child and parent characteristics associated with Canadian parents’ reports of spanking. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 33, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-2014-014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querido, J. G., Bearss, K., & Eyberg, S. M. (2002). Parent/child interaction therapy. In F. W. Kaslow & T. Patterson (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy: Cognitive-behavioral approaches (Vol. 2, pp. 91–113). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor test: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164671.

  • Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M. (2003). A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M. (2010). Parent–child aggression: Association with child abuse potential and parenting styles. Violence and Victims, 25(6), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.6.728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M., & Wittig, S. M. (2019). Predicting child problem behavior and maternal/paternal parent-child aggression: identifying early prevention targets. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 60, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rominov, H., Giallo, R., & Whelan, T. A. (2016). Fathers’ postnatal distress, parenting self-efficacy, later parenting behavior, and children’s emotional-behavioral functioning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(8), 907 https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00153.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and metaanalysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003.

  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2958889.

  • Snarr, J. D., Slep, A. M. S., & Grande, V. P. (2009). Validation of a new self-report measure of parental attributions. Psychological Assessment, 21, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for numbers of common factors. Iowa City, IA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., & Warren, W. L. (2003). The conflict tactics scales handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturge-Apple, M. L., Li, Z., Martin, M. J., Jones-Gordils, H. R., & Davies, P. T. (2020). Mothers’ and fathers’ self-regulation capacity, dysfunctional attributions and hostile parenting during early adolescence: A process-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 32(1), 229–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vittrup, B., Holden, G. W., & Buck, J. (2006). Attitudes predict the use of physical punishment: A prospective study of the emergence of disciplinary practices. Pediatrics, 117, 2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C. (2001). The incredible years: Parents, teachers, and children training series. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 18, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J007v18n03_04.

  • Wittkowski, A., Garrett, C., & Calam, R., et al. (2017). Self-report measures of parental self-efficacy: A systematic review of the current literature. Journal of Child Family Studies, 26, 2960–2978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0830-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Elena Gallitto & Elisa Romano

Authors
  1. Elena Gallitto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisa Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Gallitto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We verify that there are no potential conflicts of interest pertaining to this manuscript and that the treatment of all participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association. The study was approved by the Office of Research Ethics and Integrity of the University of Ottawa (REB # H-02-18-352). The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallitto, E., Romano, E. The Positive Discipline in Everyday Parenting Questionnaire: Psychometric Characteristics of a Revised Version. J Child Fam Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02818-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02818-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation